SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Keep rolling with these lines

Créé par: Gmonwy
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 14 avr. 2021
Publié: 14 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
11 goals in 8 periods played and only 3 against. These lines are rolling and time to start the push for that last playoff spot. We are coming for you Canadiens
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $68 201 666 $0 $457 500 $13 298 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
875 000 $875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Flames de Calgary
801 666 $801 666 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 avr. 2021 à 21 h 33
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,305
Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
if it ain't broke, don't fix it. nice dub, CGY
Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
14 avr. 2021 à 22 h 22
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,238
Mentions "j'aime": 19,507
Ok so its pretty obvious that Calgary went on that small win streak after the Sutter hiring then the hype faded. I wonder if this new look they are showing is just Sutter fully implementing his system. God this team is such a tease, I had finally started to accept the lottery pick spot and was looking at who we may take at 5-8.

Anyways really happy with the performance of the new lines and pairings overall. That 1 goal against tonight was a poor line change decision by Andersson but that also means they never put us under any sustained pressure.

Before the season started I had said they probably swap to Hanifin - Andersson as the top pair before season end so that we can stop relying on Gio so heabily and let the young guys take over. I think doing so has really made our blue line more consistent. Hanifin hasn't lost a step with his new partner (now 10 points in 18 games since Ward was fired) and the Tanev has covered for Gio's regression very well. I think by next year it may be a good idea to put Valimaki with Tanev (Hughes treatment) and reduce Gio's EV minutes on the 3rd pair, afaik Boston did this with Chara as well.
Alfie11 a aimé ceci.
14 avr. 2021 à 22 h 42
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Ok so its pretty obvious that Calgary went on that small win streak after the Sutter hiring then the hype faded. I wonder if this new look they are showing is just Sutter fully implementing his system. God this team is such a tease, I had finally started to accept the lottery pick spot and was looking at who we may take at 5-8.

Anyways really happy with the performance of the new lines and pairings overall. That 1 goal against tonight was a poor line change decision by Andersson but that also means they never put us under any sustained pressure.

Before the season started I had said they probably swap to Hanifin - Andersson as the top pair before season end so that we can stop relying on Gio so heabily and let the young guys take over. I think doing so has really made our blue line more consistent. Hanifin hasn't lost a step with his new partner (now 10 points in 18 games since Ward was fired) and the Tanev has covered for Gio's regression very well. I think by next year it may be a good idea to put Valimaki with Tanev (Hughes treatment) and reduce Gio's EV minutes on the 3rd pair, afaik Boston did this with Chara as well.

I agree with everything you said here. I honestly think it's better for our long term outlook to not make the playoffs this year though, I'd rather pick in the top 10 and hope an impact forward prospect is available. Unless we trade our 1st in a package for eichel lol
14 avr. 2021 à 23 h 13
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,971
Mentions "j'aime": 18,305
Quoting: Alfie11
I agree with everything you said here. I honestly think it's better for our long term outlook to not make the playoffs this year though, I'd rather pick in the top 10 and hope an impact forward prospect is available. Unless we trade our 1st in a package for eichel lol


Devils will have a top-10 pick.
If we could add an asset by swapping with team in mid-teens, could be our best move.
Assuming we end up around #7.
(And Power, Hughes, Edvinsson off board)
14 avr. 2021 à 23 h 30
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Devils will have a top-10 pick.
If we could add an asset by swapping with team in mid-teens, could be our best move.
Assuming we end up around #7.
(And Power, Hughes, Edvinsson off board)

I don’t specifically know what the devils needs are (I would assume more D, doesn’t look like there’s much high end talent in your prospect pool outside Smith?) so staying in the top 10 and taking Lambos or Edvinsson might be a good move. You’d also get first crack at the field if you want a winger (maybe you’re lucky and snag Johnson, if not you could likely get a guy like Lysell). I think that trading down in this draft might be a good strategy in other years, but with how little some guys have played I think the safest spots to pick are top 10, and then literally anything after 25, the middle area is more likely to be disappointing than most years, and actually making a good pick likely won’t even seem like a steal, it would just be breaking even. The top 10 seems pretty safe though, and of course by 25 you’re more likely to miss than hit anyway.
15 avr. 2021 à 0 h 2
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,971
Mentions "j'aime": 18,305
Quoting: Alfie11
I don’t specifically know what the devils needs are (I would assume more D, doesn’t look like there’s much high end talent in your prospect pool outside Smith?) so staying in the top 10 and taking Lambos or Edvinsson might be a good move. You’d also get first crack at the field if you want a winger (maybe you’re lucky and snag Johnson, if not you could likely get a guy like Lysell). I think that trading down in this draft might be a good strategy in other years, but with how little some guys have played I think the safest spots to pick are top 10, and then literally anything after 25, the middle area is more likely to be disappointing than most years, and actually making a good pick likely won’t even seem like a steal, it would just be breaking even. The top 10 seems pretty safe though, and of course by 25 you’re more likely to miss than hit anyway.


Biggest needs are on Defense. Specifically, a defensive top-4 LHD and RHD depth. Ty Smith and Severson are top-4 quality. LHD pipeline are mostly a bunch of wild cards. The hope is one or two of Mukmahadullin, Bahl, Okhotyuk, Misyul and Siegenthaler take a step up, but no sure-fire bets there. Okhotyuk probably gets first look, but is mostly just hard-hitting physical type. Bahl has size, skill, skating but many holes in his game. Muk, who knows. On right side, Reilly Walsh looks to be viable option offensively and Case McCarthy as shut-down d-man. None look to be top-pair types.

Our forward groups looks to be in better shape. A top-9 seems to be forming with Hughes, Hischier, Zacha, Bratt, Holtz, Foote, Mercer, Sharangovich and Kuokkanen. Some upside with Gritsyuk, Thompson and Boqvist. Some decent bottom-6 bigs with Bastian, McLeod, Wood, Maltsev, Pytlik.

I like Power, Hughes and Edvinsson and see a sizable drop-off to next tier with Cuelemans, Clarke, Lambos, etc. And there are a few forwards worth taking there.

If I was picking in top-10, I would keep that pick for:

Beniers
Edvinsson
Power
Hughes
Guenther
Lucius

If all those guys were gone, I’d trade back. All these guys are in similar tier for me:

Sillinger
Raty
Coronato
Eklund
Cuelemans
Lysell

I did a 7-round mock draft: https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/441023?post_id=2270414 If you want too see whole list.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage