SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

First Crack at the Off-season

Créé par: desertdog111
Équipe: 2021-22 Coyotes de l'Arizona
Date de création initiale: 14 avr. 2021
Publié: 14 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
It’s going to be a busy off-season for the Coyotes, who will have roughly $30M in cap space once their pending UFAs come off the books. Armstrong has said that he is looking to make big changes and really shape the roster under his vision as opposed to the mess that he has inherited from Chayka.

Army has also said he’s looking to leverage said cap space to acquire assets from cap strapped teams this off-season. I didn’t include any of those type of trades because it’s hard to say who will be in that type of cap hell yet.

The Schmaltz trade could also be subbed for the Dumba for Schmaltz trade that has been discussed. It should be a priority to trade him while his asset value is still decent.

Assuming Keumper is not taken by the Kraken (I think the Coyotes should protect Hill), he should be traded to make room for Hill to have the crease, and sign a 1B type like Rittich to support him.

The rest of the signings are players I’d like to see on the team, but I’m not sure the Coyotes won’t just tank next season and let some of the kids play instead. Most of that depends on how the organization views Hayton and to an extent Jenik since they’re developing them both as centers. If they’re down on them, they may shoot for a top pick so they can add a true 1C.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
26 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
12 500 000 $
33 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
56 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
ARI
    Seattle
    2.
    ARI
    1. Ristolainen, Rasmus
    2. Thompson, Tage
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
    BUF
    1. Capobianco, Kyle
    2. Schmaltz, Nick
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (ARI)
    Détails additionnels:
    Prior to Expansion Draft
    3.
    ARI
    1. Geekie, Morgan [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
    CAR
    1. Kuemper, Darcy
    Détails additionnels:
    To any contending team that loses a goalie in expansion draft for similar value (young roster player/B- prospect and a 2nd/3rd round pick
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de ARI
    2022
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de ARI
    2023
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de ARI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $72 992 784 $196 951 $2 150 000 $8 507 216 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    7 150 000 $7 150 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
    C
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 150 000 $$2M)
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 6
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    1 533 333 $1 533 333 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    700 000 $700 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    14 avr. 2021 à 20 h 56
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 9,221
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,958
    That is quite the overpayment for Larsson.

    With the goalie options available for Seattle, I doubt hill is a serious candidate for Francis unless you have no one else of value. Who is Arizona re-signing on defense to expose for the ED?
    14 avr. 2021 à 21 h 1
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 873
    Mentions "j'aime": 262
    Quoting: ecupirate07
    That is quite the overpayment for Larsson.

    With the goalie options available for Seattle, I doubt hill is a serious candidate for Francis unless you have no one else of value. Who is Arizona re-signing on defense to expose for the ED?


    I agree but sadly it’ll probably take that much to get him to consider....

    They can either sign Lyubushkin or they could do the Schmaltz deal before expansion. Or do both and gamble that Seattle doesn’t take Lyubushkin.

    As for Hill, he’s probably not the top of the list by any means but I think it would be worth their while to protect him instead and try and get younger between the pipes. Especially if they’re going to tank for a better pick. Worst case scenario he turns into a legit #1.
    14 avr. 2021 à 21 h 10
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 9,221
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,958
    I appreciate the response. What would it cost for us to send Gardiner to Arizona? Geekie +

    I like the Kuemper deal but I don’t know that we would expose Ned at this point.
    14 avr. 2021 à 21 h 16
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 873
    Mentions "j'aime": 262
    Quoting: ecupirate07
    I appreciate the response. What would it cost for us to send Gardiner to Arizona? Geekie +

    I like the Kuemper deal but I don’t know that we would expose Ned at this point.


    Assuming Keumper is not a part of the deal? I’m not very familiar with Gardiner’s play other than the fact that people on here like to hate him. I’d say that it would probably take something a little more enticing than Geekie if he’s really that bad, but again I don’t know for sure. What would you offer from the Canes perspective to be rid of him?
    14 avr. 2021 à 21 h 24
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 9,221
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,958
    Quoting: desertdog111
    Assuming Keumper is not a part of the deal? I’m not very familiar with Gardiner’s play other than the fact that people on here like to hate him. I’d say that it would probably take something a little more enticing than Geekie if he’s really that bad, but again I don’t know for sure. What would you offer from the Canes perspective to be rid of him?

    Im not a hater of Gardiner but is highly redundant and hasn’t produced the points we expected. You have a forward contract you want move? I would say we might offer Geekie and another good prospect or a pick. If you like Geekie. If not, we could do a prospect that is close like Cotton or Bokk and a pick. Gardiner could be your exposure requirement too.
    14 avr. 2021 à 22 h 15
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 873
    Mentions "j'aime": 262
    Quoting: ecupirate07
    Im not a hater of Gardiner but is highly redundant and hasn’t produced the points we expected. You have a forward contract you want move? I would say we might offer Geekie and another good prospect or a pick. If you like Geekie. If not, we could do a prospect that is close like Cotton or Bokk and a pick. Gardiner could be your exposure requirement too.


    No forward contracts that we’re looking to move other than Schmaltz, but if this is a cap move then that’s redundant as well because his cap is higher than Gardiners.

    If we’re doing straight up, I’d do Gardiner, Bokk, and an upper mid-round pick for one of our AHL guys that is close, say Capobianco, and a late round pick. Perhaps add in Geekie too, but if that becomes too rich then it’s not a deal breaker
    14 avr. 2021 à 22 h 32
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 9,221
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,958
    Quoting: desertdog111
    No forward contracts that we’re looking to move other than Schmaltz, but if this is a cap move then that’s redundant as well because his cap is higher than Gardiners.

    If we’re doing straight up, I’d do Gardiner, Bokk, and an upper mid-round pick for one of our AHL guys that is close, say Capobianco, and a late round pick. Perhaps add in Geekie too, but if that becomes too rich then it’s not a deal breaker


    The Canes may begrudgingly do that.
    desertdog111 a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage