SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Curious tough

Créé par: RoiArthur
Équipe: 2020-21 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 13 avr. 2021
Publié: 13 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Still before the playoffs 2021, after the trade deadline.
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de WSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
Logo de VGK
Logo de PHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2581 500 000 $74 299 642 $0 $3 137 500 $7 200 358 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 625 000 $1 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
737 500 $737 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 avr. 2021 à 17 h 7
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,490
Mentions "j'aime": 6,423
Seriously?! Staal with Drouin and Anderson when KK was dominant with them last night! Staal is too slow he needs to be on the 4th line preferably as a winger or in the press box where he is not hurting the team, he is a -6 in 5 games! Lines based off of play alone should be

Tarta-Danault-Byron
Drouin-KK-Anderson
Toffoli-Suzuki-Perry
Lehkonen-Evans-Armia

Defense is good though
13 avr. 2021 à 17 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,403
Mentions "j'aime": 632
Quoting: Campabee
Seriously?! Staal with Drouin and Anderson when KK was dominant with them last night! Staal is too slow he needs to be on the 4th line preferably as a winger or in the press box where he is not hurting the team, he is a -6 in 5 games! Lines based off of play alone should be

Tarta-Danault-Byron
Drouin-KK-Anderson
Toffoli-Suzuki-Perry
Lehkonen-Evans-Armia

Defense is good though


Staal been fine
13 avr. 2021 à 18 h 4
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,490
Mentions "j'aime": 6,423
Quoting: habsfan00
Staal been fine


He is slow and is pretty much invisible most of the time. He isn't creating chances and doesn't get the puck out of the D zone very well. The only thing he does well is win faceoffs.
habsfan00 a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 20 h 2
#4
Démarrer sujet
Cedric Archambault
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 758
Mentions "j'aime": 157
Quoting: Campabee
He is slow and is pretty much invisible most of the time. He isn't creating chances and doesn't get the puck out of the D zone very well. The only thing he does well is win faceoffs.


I understand your point, very good 🙂 so if he wins faceoffs...
Lines should be:

Tatar Danault Byron
Drouin Kotkaniemi Anderson
Toffoli Suzuki Perry
Lehkonen Staal Armia

Edmunson Weber
Kulak Petry
Romanov Merrill (even if i think Gustavson can take is place because Merrill cause turnover often ...) let’s see
13 avr. 2021 à 20 h 12
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,490
Mentions "j'aime": 6,423
Quoting: CeceHuey
I understand your point, very good 🙂 so if he wins faceoffs...
Lines should be:

Tatar Danault Byron
Drouin Kotkaniemi Anderson
Toffoli Suzuki Perry
Lehkonen Staal Armia

Edmunson Weber
Kulak Petry
Romanov Merrill (even if i think Gustavson can take is place because Merrill cause turnover often ...) let’s see


Evans just brings more than Staal IMO. Staal strength is winning FO, Evans has speed, better defensive awareness, more of an offensive threat and wins FO at about 50% compared to Staal's 68% ish. FO are not as important as people would have you believe. For instance did you know 3 of the last 5 Cup winners had a team FO% of less than 50%? Keep Evans in and if you really want to keep Staal in replace Lehky with him and alternate Evans with Staal when there is an important draw
13 avr. 2021 à 20 h 50
#6
Démarrer sujet
Cedric Archambault
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 758
Mentions "j'aime": 157
Quoting: Campabee
Evans just brings more than Staal IMO. Staal strength is winning FO, Evans has speed, better defensive awareness, more of an offensive threat and wins FO at about 50% compared to Staal's 68% ish. FO are not as important as people would have you believe. For instance did you know 3 of the last 5 Cup winners had a team FO% of less than 50%? Keep Evans in and if you really want to keep Staal in replace Lehky with him and alternate Evans with Staal when there is an important draw


If you want to talk about lotto, maybe can you give us links to your stats, just curious tough 😁
13 avr. 2021 à 22 h 6
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,490
Mentions "j'aime": 6,423
Quoting: CeceHuey
If you want to talk about lotto, maybe can you give us links to your stats, just curious tough 😁


What lotto are you talking about? The stat was on sportscaster yesterday around 5:30pm EST, but I am sure you can look the stats up on hockeyreference.com.
RoiArthur a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 22 h 24
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,490
Mentions "j'aime": 6,423
Tampa Bay 19-20 FO % 50.5 see link

https://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/TBL/2020.html#all_team_stats

St Louis FO % 51.4% see link

https://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/STL/2019.html

Washington Capitals 50.4%

https://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/WSH/2018.html

Pittsburgh Penguins 47.6%

https://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/PIT/2017.html

Pittsburgh Penguins 50.2%

https://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/PIT/2016.html

Now that I provided the links I will add this. Those stats are for ALL players who took 1 or more draws, including wingers and D men who tend to inflate the team stat a bit. You can narrow down the stats by selecting only players who have taken more than say 250 draws over the course of the season to get a more accurate number but I didn't feel like doing that. Just a quick look at the the stats and you will see most of these teams only have 1 C higher than 50% one hovers around 50% and 2 or more are often below 47%. Take a look if you don't believe me. FO are not as critical as everyone makes them out to be.
RoiArthur a aimé ceci.
14 avr. 2021 à 11 h 29
#9
Démarrer sujet
Cedric Archambault
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 758
Mentions "j'aime": 157
Quoting: Campabee
Tampa Bay 19-20 FO % 50.5 see link

https://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/TBL/2020.html#all_team_stats

St Louis FO % 51.4% see link

https://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/STL/2019.html

Washington Capitals 50.4%

https://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/WSH/2018.html

Pittsburgh Penguins 47.6%

https://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/PIT/2017.html

Pittsburgh Penguins 50.2%

https://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/PIT/2016.html

Now that I provided the links I will add this. Those stats are for ALL players who took 1 or more draws, including wingers and D men who tend to inflate the team stat a bit. You can narrow down the stats by selecting only players who have taken more than say 250 draws over the course of the season to get a more accurate number but I didn't feel like doing that. Just a quick look at the the stats and you will see most of these teams only have 1 C higher than 50% one hovers around 50% and 2 or more are often below 47%. Take a look if you don't believe me. FO are not as critical as everyone makes them out to be.


Man you are a real one wink thank you, Heart Eyes
Campabee a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage