SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Year

Créé par: Crazy66
Équipe: 2021-22 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 13 avr. 2021
Publié: 13 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
21 025 000 $
67 650 000 $
1925 000 $
34 500 000 $
2850 000 $
21 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
13 450 000 $
55 500 000 $
24 500 000 $
11 050 000 $
14 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
    expansion pick
    2.
    BUF
    1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
    Détails additionnels:
    The best of Ottawas 3 7ths they own
    3.
    CGY
    1. Olofsson, Victor
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
    Détails additionnels:
    If the pick is top 10 sabres can choose to retain the pick in which its unprotected for 2023
    Rachats de contrats
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de COL
    Logo de BUF
    2022
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de OTT
    2023
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $81 088 916 $113 916 $850 000 $411 084 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    7 650 000 $7 650 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 3
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    889 166 $889 166 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 4
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    13 avr. 2021 à 13 h 54
    #1
    GO FLAMES GO
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 18,268
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,612
    Flames decline
    13 avr. 2021 à 14 h 12
    #2
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 927
    Mentions "j'aime": 305
    Instead of just saying flames decline, I'll try do what the website is intended for and give feedback and have a conversations.

    Lindholm is way too important to the Flames, he's cost controlled, one year older than Oloffson and as of next year Oloffson likely gets paid more. With Lindholm being only one of 2 forwards on the Flames that have a contract past the next two years his 4.5 ish cap hit becomes very important when trying to negotiate with Tkachuk, Gaudreau, Mangiapane etc. If they were to move him I don't think they would allow a team to protect their draft pick cause the Flames would be in full rebuild mode at that point.
    13 avr. 2021 à 14 h 34
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Crazy
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 902
    Mentions "j'aime": 234
    Quoting: PhatRas
    Instead of just saying flames decline, I'll try do what the website is intended for and give feedback and have a conversations.

    Lindholm is way too important to the Flames, he's cost controlled, one year older than Oloffson and as of next year Oloffson likely gets paid more. With Lindholm being only one of 2 forwards on the Flames that have a contract past the next two years his 4.5 ish cap hit becomes very important when trying to negotiate with Tkachuk, Gaudreau, Mangiapane etc. If they were to move him I don't think they would allow a team to protect their draft pick cause the Flames would be in full rebuild mode at that point.


    I understand what your saying but i, personally, believe flames should go full rebuild, and embrace the suck for a couple years, I'm not to crazy about most of there core. But thanks for the feedback it its helpful
    13 avr. 2021 à 14 h 39
    #4
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 927
    Mentions "j'aime": 305
    Quoting: Crazy66
    I understand what your saying but i, personally, believe flames should go full rebuild, and embrace the suck for a couple years, I'm not to crazy about most of there core. But thanks for the feedback it its helpful


    I definitely don't completely disagree with you but they just won't, Markstrom is here for 6 years, they will get their pound of flesh from him for at least three more, Treliving and Sutter both have two more seasons on their deals and neither of them will lead a tank job. I think they have three years to be competitive, once the Lucic deal is gone and you have Backlund, Tanev and Lindholm in the last year of their deals it will be a full sell off and they will be the worst team in the league for a bit.
    Crazy66 a aimé ceci.
    13 avr. 2021 à 14 h 46
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 38,288
    Mentions "j'aime": 19,538
    Modifié 13 avr. 2021 à 15 h 10
    Quoting: Crazy66
    I understand what your saying but i, personally, believe flames should go full rebuild, and embrace the suck for a couple years, I'm not to crazy about most of there core. But thanks for the feedback it its helpful


    I feel like thats a pot calling the kettle black statement. As a lot of people feel Buffalo should scorch earth too.

    Flames are not in a position to full rebuild, they just spent 10.5M on 2 long term contracts of players over 30. So let's assume a partial rebuild/retool instead. Either way Lindholm will be much more useful to them than Olofsson and the pick (assuming there is obviouslya protectionon the pick). Hes a top line C/RW that ia excellent at both ends of the ice on a long term deal under 5M. That is the kind of player you build around, Kopitar/Bergeron esque.
    Crazy66 a aimé ceci.
    13 avr. 2021 à 16 h 17
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 596
    Mentions "j'aime": 155
    Flames laugh and hang up
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage