SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realistic next year

Créé par: Saskleaf
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 13 avr. 2021
Publié: 13 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 500 000 $
22 750 000 $
11 250 000 $
11 250 000 $
11 250 000 $
1800 000 $
21 600 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
    Seattle
    2.
    ARI
    1. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2022
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $81 363 116 $0 $400 000 $136 884 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    796 667 $796 667 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    C
    UFA
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    1 533 333 $1 533 333 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    894 167 $894 167 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DD
    RFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 17
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,379
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Don't sign Simmonds, don't trade for Crouse, carry 20 skaters and keep kerfoot who is better than Staal at this point
    DraftCentralMP a aimé ceci.
    13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 17
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,379
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    A team in a cap crunch shouldn't be paying over 1 mil for fourth liners
    13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 21
    #3
    Roster Architect
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 2,643
    Mentions "j'aime": 909
    Don't hate this, though I don't really see Staal as an option for the team. Keefe has been saying pretty much since the day he took over that he wants a 3rd line as a shutdown line and Staal isn't really a fit for that. I think Riley Nash will impress enough to be brought back and centre the shutdown line, Keefe said he's liked him since he saw him in the bubble so I think he'll impress him now.

    I do like the top 6 though! I think Robertson has been the answer all along and they're just waiting for him to be ready for more minutes. And Galch has look even better on the top line than he did with Tavares and Nylander so the fit is there.

    I think Bogosian will play himself out of Toronto. He hasn't been great this season but he hasn't been bad. I just think he'll be looking for a bigger raise this off-season and won't be able to fit in Toronto, although I think they highly consider bringing him back.

    A lot of this obviously depends on the expansion draft and Kerfoot being taken for salary relief. I assume you protected the 8-1 option? Which would leave Kerfoot and Dermott available. I think Seattle wold take Kerfoot too, but if I'm Dubas then I'm throwing something at Ron Francis to make sure he takes Kerfoot so I knew I had the money to re-sign Hyman and not have to worry about leaving him exposed as a pending UFA.

    Goaltending is a big question mark to me here. I'm not a big believer in Rittich and I don't think he deserves his same salary after a poor last 2 seasons. Campbell seems too injury prone to be ready for a starter's role so I'd bring in someone that could handle a bigger load if needed. What would your thoughts be on bringing Andersen back on a cheap 1 year deal to prove it again? I think as rough of a year as its been for him it may work out well for Toronto because now they can bring him back cheaper, and see who's really better between him and Campbell.

    I actually just posted something pretty similar to what you have here with a lot of the things from my comment here. Check it out if you wanna see more of a visual of what I was thinking:

    https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/440574?post_id=2266659
    13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 24
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 490
    Mentions "j'aime": 74
    I do like the Crouse deal.
    Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
    13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 43
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Go leafs go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 13,179
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,152
    Quoting: BCAPP
    Don't sign Simmonds, don't trade for Crouse, carry 20 skaters and keep kerfoot who is better than Staal at this point


    Quoting: BCAPP
    A team in a cap crunch shouldn't be paying over 1 mil for fourth liners


    Kerfoot is likely Seattle bound (provided the leafs protect Holl and go 4-4)
    So, to replace his depth scoring, you need more options. Based on the deadline, the leafs have no problem is paying 4th liners over 1 mil now, and there's no reason they should. And the leafs have realized grit is essentual to success as a team. Simmonds and Crouse provide that. I don't deny Kerfoot is better than Staal. But Staal is cheaper. Also it doesn't have to be Staal, it can be another veteran guy for a similar price, for example, Nash or Goodrow (I think he's a centre...).
    13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 53
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Go leafs go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 13,179
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,152
    Quoting: TrueCanuck
    Don't hate this, though I don't really see Staal as an option for the team. Keefe has been saying pretty much since the day he took over that he wants a 3rd line as a shutdown line and Staal isn't really a fit for that. I think Riley Nash will impress enough to be brought back and centre the shutdown line, Keefe said he's liked him since he saw him in the bubble so I think he'll impress him now.

    I do like the top 6 though! I think Robertson has been the answer all along and they're just waiting for him to be ready for more minutes. And Galch has look even better on the top line than he did with Tavares and Nylander so the fit is there.

    I think Bogosian will play himself out of Toronto. He hasn't been great this season but he hasn't been bad. I just think he'll be looking for a bigger raise this off-season and won't be able to fit in Toronto, although I think they highly consider bringing him back.

    A lot of this obviously depends on the expansion draft and Kerfoot being taken for salary relief. I assume you protected the 8-1 option? Which would leave Kerfoot and Dermott available. I think Seattle wold take Kerfoot too, but if I'm Dubas then I'm throwing something at Ron Francis to make sure he takes Kerfoot so I knew I had the money to re-sign Hyman and not have to worry about leaving him exposed as a pending UFA.

    Goaltending is a big question mark to me here. I'm not a big believer in Rittich and I don't think he deserves his same salary after a poor last 2 seasons. Campbell seems too injury prone to be ready for a starter's role so I'd bring in someone that could handle a bigger load if needed. What would your thoughts be on bringing Andersen back on a cheap 1 year deal to prove it again? I think as rough of a year as its been for him it may work out well for Toronto because now they can bring him back cheaper, and see who's really better between him and Campbell.

    I actually just posted something pretty similar to what you have here with a lot of the things from my comment here. Check it out if you wanna see more of a visual of what I was thinking:

    https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/440574?post_id=2266659


    Thanks!

    Staal doesn't have be the guy they sign, Nash is perfectly fine as well.

    Bosogian might leave. I think the leafs defense will have Rielly, Brodie, Muzzin, Holl (or if he is lost to Seattle, his replacement), and one of Dermott, Hutton or Bososian kept (and also Sandin and Liljgren). If the leafs would rather keep Dermott, then that is also fine.

    As for Kerfoot and the Kraken, I don't see a point in doing anything there. If I'm Francis I take Kerfoot, because 1-2c options are limited (Kerfoot is ideally a 3c, but if Seattle has him as a 2c, they aren't doing too bad). If they want to take Dermott, let them. He's a 3rd pairing defenseman and at this point I don't think he'll be anything more with the team. If they want to take Hyman, which I doubt they will, then sending them a late pick may be smart, but Hyman could come right back to Toronto, he has been clear he wants to stay, even if it's for a little less money.

    I'd be fine to have Andersen back for a cheap one year deal if it's less than he currently earns. Personally I'm confident in a Campbell Riitch tandem though. They both have shown if the workload is right they can be a starter/tandem goalie. If one is bad, the other can be the starter.
    13 avr. 2021 à 14 h 47
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,379
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Saskleaf
    Kerfoot is likely Seattle bound (provided the leafs protect Holl and go 4-4)
    So, to replace his depth scoring, you need more options. Based on the deadline, the leafs have no problem is paying 4th liners over 1 mil now, and there's no reason they should. And the leafs have realized grit is essentual to success as a team. Simmonds and Crouse provide that. I don't deny Kerfoot is better than Staal. But Staal is cheaper. Also it doesn't have to be Staal, it can be another veteran guy for a similar price, for example, Nash or Goodrow (I think he's a centre...).


    The problem is having a tough or gritty fourth line doesn't make your team tough or gritty. If you want the team grittier you need it throughout the line up
    13 avr. 2021 à 14 h 48
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,379
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Also I'm in agreement above re Bogosian.

    Bogosian has now had a good cup run and if he continues on his pace a good year playing regular minutes.

    I think he tries to get something in the 2-2.75 mil range with some term.

    Say a 3 year 7 mil dollar contract in a team that wants some toughness. We just don't have the cap room to offer it
    Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
    13 avr. 2021 à 15 h 3
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Go leafs go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 13,179
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,152
    Quoting: BCAPP
    The problem is having a tough or gritty fourth line doesn't make your team tough or gritty. If you want the team grittier you need it throughout the line up


    Fair, but a gritty 4th line is better than a non gritty 4th line, which is almost useless.
    13 avr. 2021 à 15 h 47
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,379
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Saskleaf
    Fair, but a gritty 4th line is better than a non gritty 4th line, which is almost useless.


    I think if Dubas/Keefe make a checking third line than our fourth line will be sheltered scoring.
    Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage