SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Then the Offseason

Créé par: jfrojelin
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 13 avr. 2021
Publié: 13 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
22 300 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 250 000 $
13 500 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
ANA
  1. Burns, Brent
  2. Dahlén, Jonathan [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
please take him. He's not all that bad Ron, please, for me
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (NSH)
NSH
  1. Gambrell, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
We need a legit 3C, and I'd rather pay our 4C a little less than he may command. If he takes 900k then forget this trade exists
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
CGY
  1. Donato, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Doug hinted that we may have 10 picks in this draft (irl we have 8). We just have so many wingers, and I think they've earned legit NHL shots. Also, saving any bits of money where we can is needed. 2022 offseason is huge
4.
SJS
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
VAN
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
Logo de SJS
Logo de NSH
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $68 488 696 $0 $857 500 $13 011 304 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 avr. 2021 à 11 h 24
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,211
Mentions "j'aime": 10,557
Sorry Flames need picks for a possible rebuild/retool
13 avr. 2021 à 11 h 27
#2
Démarrer sujet
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: Gmonwy
Sorry Flames need picks for a possible rebuild/retool


ok, probably another team then. I was looking for teams with multiple thirds
13 avr. 2021 à 11 h 29
#3
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,211
Mentions "j'aime": 10,557
Quoting: jfrojelin
ok, probably another team then. I was looking for teams with multiple thirds


I don't think they will but they need it. They are going to go nowhere with this team with Gaudreau and Monahan.
13 avr. 2021 à 11 h 34
#4
Démarrer sujet
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: Gmonwy
I don't think they will but they need it. They are going to go nowhere with this team with Gaudreau and Monahan.


Do you think they'd trade Gaudreu? at what price?
13 avr. 2021 à 11 h 35
#5
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,211
Mentions "j'aime": 10,557
Quoting: jfrojelin
Do you think they'd trade Gaudreu? at what price?


No idea. I am biased as he is my favorite player. I can see them trading him to Philly because he grew up around there.
13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 8
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Why give away Donato? Hes on 40 point pace
crankshaft a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 14
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Quoting: papishark
Why give away Donato? Hes on 40 point pace


He certainly beats Granlund and will come cheaper.
papishark a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 14
#8
Démarrer sujet
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: papishark
Why give away Donato? Hes on 40 point pace


Sasha, True, Gregor, and Blichfeld combined all cost less, so I want flexibility if I'm DW to acquire assets for cap dumps and have money for 2022 to keep our core. It could be Balcers as well. Even without him we aren't giving Cheko or Dahlen NHL shots which could be warranted next season.

I just think with out huge depth at wing we should use it to acquire a position of need like RD or C, or get futures.
13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 17
#9
Démarrer sujet
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: crankshaft
He certainly beats Granlund and will come cheaper.


Granlund warrants one year, so we get future flexibility. Also Granlund is a C, and trading Donato gets us another pick.

It's super little, but we need to maximize value
13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 23
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Disagree with all the trades. Gambrell has earned a contract and his keep on the team. You only take on Eriksson in a full rebuild and we can't full rebuild with the NMC's and NTC's we have so that's moot. Donato is slightly better than Granlund, 4 years younger and cheaper.
papishark et FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 24
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Quoting: jfrojelin
Granlund warrants one year, so we get future flexibility. Also Granlund is a C, and trading Donato gets us another pick.

It's super little, but we need to maximize value


His profile says he's a C but he is mostly playing on the wing.
13 avr. 2021 à 12 h 34
#12
Démarrer sujet
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: crankshaft
Disagree with all the trades. Gambrell has earned a contract and his keep on the team. You only take on Eriksson in a full rebuild and we can't full rebuild with the NMC's and NTC's we have so that's moot. Donato is slightly better than Granlund, 4 years younger and cheaper.


My personal plan is to build for 2022-23. Sadly the offseason before it, we need to re-sign players. That's why I have so many low budget and 1 year deals, because of that.

Also I can totally take on Eriksson, it's one year that we can afford with 3mil to spare, and he's not even waived. Didn't even ask for a first. One year of paying a guy to not play does not indicate a rebuild. We're just gaining assets which we need.

Granlund has played more C than Donato. If you want a different player that's more of a true C I agree. Center depth is our largest need. If you're that set on Gambrell make him the 4C, I don't really care. He can still play PK and dzone starts that way. On the cuda, True is very entertaining and has worked well with pretty much any winger he's been given. Donato as a 3rd line winger would be eventually passed by Blichfeld Balcers Cheko etc. I just want to maximize value. Replacing Donato with slightly lesser versions of him, while paying less money and getting assets, is absolutely ideal. It's minor, but maximize value is what we need to do with tight cap, minimal assets, and an underaverage prospect pool
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage