SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

DUCKS FANS OPINIONS PLS

Créé par: Marcsnack
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 12 avr. 2021
Publié: 12 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
With the addition of Fleury, how do you approach the expansion draft?
They may consider some type of deal with Seattle, but assuming they do not, what do you do?
Do you go 7-3-1 or 4-4-1? Who gets protected and who doesnt?
Here are my opinions:
7-3-1:
Silfverberg, Rakell, Terry, Lundestrom, Jones, Steel, Volkov??
Fowler, Lindholm, Manson
Gibson
4-4-1:
Rakell, Lundestrom, Terry, Steel (Silfverberg?)
Fowler, Lindholm, Manson, Fleury
Gibson

Let me know if they go with one of these paths, or if they do something else? Really appreciate all feedback! :)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $64 066 055 $0 $850 000 $17 433 945 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $ (3 425 000 $$3M3 425 000 $$3M)
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 avr. 2021 à 16 h 46
#1
Jetsfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 7,974
Mentions "j'aime": 2,585
Im not a Duck fan but would they ever not save Fowler? Im not sure how good he is but is has a big contract
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
12 avr. 2021 à 17 h 2
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
I’m not a ducks fan but wouldn’t think fleury is worth changing expansion plans over.
OldNYIfan, Caniac555 et Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
12 avr. 2021 à 17 h 11
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,669
Mentions "j'aime": 24,583
Your 7-3-1 makes the most sense, but since when are we using that standard now that we've seen this abominably short-sighted trade?

There's a rumor that Murray might be stupid enough to expose Fowler on the theory that Seattle might balk at taking on his contract, but I don't think even he's that dumb. So I guess we'll expose the guy we traded our biggest blue-line hitter for, thereby running the risk of seeing him play fewer than 14 games for us.

Or maybe Murray's "master plan" is to trade Hampus Lindholm before the expansion draft and hope that Fleury will flower (pun intended) into his replacement. George The Shrub Bush had a term for this: "turd blossom." I can't see it working.

Shea Theodore, Marcus Pettersson, Christian Djoos, now Jani Hakanpaa . . . all errors of entirely different degrees, to be sure, but emblematic of an inability to properly analyze defensive futures.
Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
12 avr. 2021 à 17 h 22
#4
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,720
Mentions "j'aime": 3,588
This is the correct answer. Whatever problem/ plan was in place before is still in place. Fleury played well at the end of last year and in the bubble when he was given mins and played physical...just didn’t see it enough

Quoting: Timmah007
I’m not a ducks fan but wouldn’t think fleury is worth changing expansion plans over.
Marcsnack, OldNYIfan et jpsnow13 a aimé ceci.
12 avr. 2021 à 21 h 2
#5
You know nothing JS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 4,395
Quoting: Caniac555
This is the correct answer. Whatever problem/ plan was in place before is still in place. Fleury played well at the end of last year and in the bubble when he was given mins and played physical...just didn’t see it enough


I agree. If I'm Seattle, my pick is Mahura anyway. Fill up on high potential RFAs opportunities.
15 avr. 2021 à 18 h 42
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 129
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Your 7-3-1 makes the most sense, but since when are we using that standard now that we've seen this abominably short-sighted trade?

There's a rumor that Murray might be stupid enough to expose Fowler on the theory that Seattle might balk at taking on his contract, but I don't think even he's that dumb. So I guess we'll expose the guy we traded our biggest blue-line hitter for, thereby running the risk of seeing him play fewer than 14 games for us.

Or maybe Murray's "master plan" is to trade Hampus Lindholm before the expansion draft and hope that Fleury will flower (pun intended) into his replacement. George The Shrub Bush had a term for this: "turd blossom." I can't see it working.

Shea Theodore, Marcus Pettersson, Christian Djoos, now Jani Hakanpaa . . . all errors of entirely different degrees, to be sure, but emblematic of an inability to properly analyze defensive futures.


Hakanpaa is a pending free agent, who says he wants to come back here? And who's to say he won't come back in the summer? Either he intends to sign elsewhere anyway so might as well get something for him. Or he wants to sign here in which case you have to wait until after (I was gonna say July 1st but I have no idea when free agency is supposed to start this summer) anyway because re-signing him now would be dumb because of the expansion draft. I mean I guess you run the risk of him really liking it in Carolina. I like Hawk, a lot, but he's not special. It would be nice if he re-signs in the summer no big deal if he doesn't.

Murray has made a lot of bad moves (he's never going to live down Theodore to Vegas; though to be fair, Shea absolutely transformed after that trade) but this certainly not one of them.
15 avr. 2021 à 18 h 48
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 129
I think Murray is going to do everything in his power to make it so Francis only has Silfverberg, Henrique and Shattenkirk to choose from and he takes one of them off of his hands. Maybe he just offers him Sam Steel in a trade and saves himself some hassle. I don't think Fleury impacts things at all.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage