SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Updated Offseason

Créé par: Florida_Man_Maroon
Équipe: 2021-22 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 11 avr. 2021
Publié: 11 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
1900 000 $
22 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
TBL
    Seattle
    VGK
    1. Johnson, Tyler
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
    3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
    2.
    TBL
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
    NJD
    1. Foote, Cal [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
    3.
    TBL
    1. Carrier, Alexandre
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (NSH)
    3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (NSH)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de NSH
    2022
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    2023
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de ANA
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2181 500 000 $81 507 621 $145 122 $0 $-7 621 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
    C, AG, AD
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    737 500 $737 500 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    900 000 $900 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    733 333 $733 333 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DD
    UFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    11 avr. 2021 à 16 h 36
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2016
    Messages: 4,088
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,848
    You'd move on from Foote so soon?
    11 avr. 2021 à 16 h 39
    #2
    I want Gourde back
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 4,524
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,350
    Quoting: Rangsey
    You'd move on from Foote so soon?


    Can't afford him in this scenario. Would want to trade him for more though. 2nds, and a 3rd is what i'd ask. Or a 1st and a 3rd
    11 avr. 2021 à 16 h 52
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,075
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,486
    I don't know a ton about Foote but I think NJ accepts? offence hasn't translated much to the NHL this year but I like his size and mobility
    MartysBetter29 a aimé ceci.
    11 avr. 2021 à 16 h 54
    #4
    Rutta 4ever
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 4,539
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,913
    I think Colton is the one we're not going to be able to afford. Foote we can probably get for 2 years <$1million.
    11 avr. 2021 à 16 h 56
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 1,726
    Mentions "j'aime": 918
    Quoting: CoopsTroops
    I think Colton is the one we're not going to be able to afford. Foote we can probably get for 2 years <$1million.


    Colton has way out performed Foote so you may be right about that. Plus we have Stephens who is a good 4th line center so we may be able to trade Colton and insert Stephens while resigning Foote. I just haven’t been very impressed with Foote so far but he is still young.
    11 avr. 2021 à 17 h 2
    #6
    Rutta 4ever
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 4,539
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,913
    Quoting: Florida_Man_Maroon
    Colton has way out performed Foote so you may be right about that. Plus we have Stephens who is a good 4th line center so we may be able to trade Colton and insert Stephens while resigning Foote. I just haven’t been very impressed with Foote so far but he is still young.


    Foote was essentially bumped from the playoffs yesterday when we traded for Savard. Our RHD depth will probably be Cernak, Savard, Rutta, and then Schenn if we play 11F/7D. There's still some raw ability with Foote, so, I don't think it's time to move on from him.

    Colton might also appreciate a bigger center role elsewhere than our 4th line. I think he's in the package that gets Johnson to Seattle, especially if he puts in a good playoff performance.
    Florida_Man_Maroon a aimé ceci.
    11 avr. 2021 à 17 h 14
    #7
    MartysBetter
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 783
    Mentions "j'aime": 181
    I see a mutual fit with Foote and NJ. Seems to make sense. NJ could offersheet him and just pay a 2nd but I think they'd be willing to go thru a trade and give a bit extra as a courtesy and to keep a good relationship with Brisbois.
    Florida_Man_Maroon a aimé ceci.
    11 avr. 2021 à 18 h 20
    #8
    SLIMY
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 267
    Mentions "j'aime": 55
    NJ certainly accepts, but if it were an ideal world, I would rather you just let the devils finally overpay TBL for sergachev. you guys are still way above the cap regardless of whether foote makes 1 mil or 5 mil. you can save 5 mil with sergachev right now, and not have to worry about two years from now when he will be worth 7-8 millioneither.

    youre practically paying us for foote in this situation, while in a sergachev trade, the devils would probably give you guys at least 1 first rounder and 2-3 B+ or A- prospects such as Foote or Boqvist.
    MartysBetter29 a aimé ceci.
    11 avr. 2021 à 19 h 0
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 1,726
    Mentions "j'aime": 918
    Quoting: Slimycoldcutswork
    NJ certainly accepts, but if it were an ideal world, I would rather you just let the devils finally overpay TBL for sergachev. you guys are still way above the cap regardless of whether foote makes 1 mil or 5 mil. you can save 5 mil with sergachev right now, and not have to worry about two years from now when he will be worth 7-8 millioneither.

    youre practically paying us for foote in this situation, while in a sergachev trade, the devils would probably give you guys at least 1 first rounder and 2-3 B+ or A- prospects such as Foote or Boqvist.


    That’s true. But with the eventual decline/departure of McD, I doubt the bolts have any intent or interest in trading Sergy. Foote will likely end up staying in Tampa simply because of need, but in regards to Sergachev he will most certainly be staying in Tampa unless 1. They are absolutely forced to trade him because of cap reasons or 2. The return is significant and considered an overpay.
    11 avr. 2021 à 20 h 15
    #10
    Vegan Commie Hipster
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 7,888
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
    Quoting: imawesome
    Can't afford him in this scenario. Would want to trade him for more though. 2nds, and a 3rd is what i'd ask. Or a 1st and a 3rd


    Just trade Rutta for an ELCer ✔

    Then:

    Hedman Cernak | McD Serg | Foote Carrier

    The young 3rd pair gets sheltered out the whazoo

    Any short term downgrade from Rutta to Foote (that may be nonexistent just next season) is worth hanging on to a promising cost controlled 23 year old
    imawesome a aimé ceci.
    11 avr. 2021 à 20 h 36
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 1,726
    Mentions "j'aime": 918
    Quoting: Radu47
    Just trade Rutta for an ELCer ✔

    Then:

    Hedman Cernak | McD Serg | Foote Carrier

    The young 3rd pair gets sheltered out the whazoo

    Any short term downgrade from Rutta to Foote (that may be nonexistent just next season) is worth hanging on to a promising cost controlled 23 year old


    For that to happen the organization is gonna need to gain some trust with Foote that is currently not there. He was essentially just replaced with the Savard trade for the rest of this year and he’s gonna need to take some more steps if he wants to prove he can play in the NHL (simply working on his speed would help)
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage