SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Busy Deadline with Lateral Movements

Créé par: jfrojelin
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 9 avr. 2021
Publié: 9 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Nieto, Matt
Détails additionnels:
only if he's healthy. I think he would be a smart add for a team new to the playoffs, not necessarily FLA
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
WSH
  1. Sörensen, Marcus (750 000 $ retained)
4.
SJS
  1. Tierney, Chris
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
OTT
  1. Labanc, Kevin
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
Sharks get the 3C they need badly and a trade up. Sens now have a wing core of Tkackuk, Dadanov, Labanc, and Stutzle (he should be a winger in the NHL). Norris and their other C should have a field day
5.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
WSH
  1. Dubnyk, Devan (1 000 000 $ retained)
6.
7.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (COL)
COL
  1. Hall, Taylor (4 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Sharks Launder 4 mil to get another pick.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de FLA
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $72 878 332 $0 $550 000 $8 621 668 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
735 000 $735 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
723 333 $723 333 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
780 000 $780 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 avr. 2021 à 10 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 421
Mentions "j'aime": 225
Premise of all of it looks fine. Would need more on Labanc though given Tierney's a UFA after next season and his scoring has dried up this year and the underlying metrics have never been great for him at any point in his career (i.e. more of a passenger than a play driver). Labanc's counting numbers should be better based on his underlying stats plus he is signed to a fair market deal for a top 6 winger through the bulk of his prime. I don't think this is the kind of return that would be categorized as "the right price" per Sheng's article. Not at least given where the organization is at in terms of contending. Lesser player signed for shorter term without any significant cap savings just to move up 2 rounds in a less than stellar draft year isn't a needle mover imo.
9 avr. 2021 à 11 h 35
#2
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,962
Mentions "j'aime": 927
Aren't we done doing OTT favors?
9 avr. 2021 à 11 h 42
#3
Démarrer sujet
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: SJS2212
Premise of all of it looks fine. Would need more on Labanc though given Tierney's a UFA after next season and his scoring has dried up this year and the underlying metrics have never been great for him at any point in his career (i.e. more of a passenger than a play driver). Labanc's counting numbers should be better based on his underlying stats plus he is signed to a fair market deal for a top 6 winger through the bulk of his prime. I don't think this is the kind of return that would be categorized as "the right price" per Sheng's article. Not at least given where the organization is at in terms of contending. Lesser player signed for shorter term without any significant cap savings just to move up 2 rounds in a less than stellar draft year isn't a needle mover imo.


I mean the "right price" is super vague. It makes me think it's like oh Doug is looking for a first and a prospect for Labanc. I'd take a first and a prospect for almost any player on this roster lmao. His contract is a slight overpay, which decreases his value. I think this trade would fill our need for a 3C, and get a player we're familiar with. Also allows us to have large amounts of cap flexibility, and pick around the same spot we got Bordeleau last season
9 avr. 2021 à 11 h 43
#4
Démarrer sujet
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: goodfella
Aren't we done doing OTT favors?


Labanc is not Norris or Stutzle
9 avr. 2021 à 13 h 21
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,421
Mentions "j'aime": 313
Quoting: jfrojelin
I mean the "right price" is super vague. It makes me think it's like oh Doug is looking for a first and a prospect for Labanc. I'd take a first and a prospect for almost any player on this roster lmao. His contract is a slight overpay, which decreases his value. I think this trade would fill our need for a 3C, and get a player we're familiar with. Also allows us to have large amounts of cap flexibility, and pick around the same spot we got Bordeleau last season


Sheng clairified that every player could be had for the right price, and such a statement about Labanc is neither controversial nor surprising. In other words, unless it's a bananas return for him Labanc isn't going anywhere.

Re the 3C... If we're so determined to add a solid 3C we should target Kerfoot. He's on a better deal than Cobra, he performs better in the role, and TOR will want to deal him fast and cheap before Monday.
9 avr. 2021 à 13 h 32
#6
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,684
Mentions "j'aime": 1,881
If this was a year ago, then I'd consider doing it, but Tierney has tanked, while Labanc has improved, Tierney is pretty solidly a cap dump at this point.
Tierney2.PNGLabanc2.PNG
SJS2212 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage