SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

SJ listening on Labanc offers - open discussion

Créé par: yikes
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 8 avr. 2021
Publié: 8 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
per Sheng Peng article

Labanc would be moved for the right price - which I would assume would be higher than what Palmieri returned. Ill assume Doug is looking for a prospect of value and a pick - while willing to help a team offload a contract.
Transactions
1.
SJS
    Just going to look at a bunch of options - starting with Florida who just made themselves have around 18million in deadline cap space.
    FLA
    2.
    SJS
    1. Heponiemi, Aleksi
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
    FLA
      Kevin Labanc
      3.
      SJS
      1. Bellows, Kieffer
      2. Komarov, Leo
      3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
      4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
      NYI
      1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
      Détails additionnels:
      Kevin Labanc
      4.
      SJS
      1. Brown, Logan
      2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
      3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
      Détails additionnels:
      This trade is an idea but very mixed for both teams. Brown hasn't really gotten a shot at the NHL but his value has dropped during all this time as he is now 23 and nothing really has happened. Both Ottawa wants a good return for Brown but also SJ could see Brown as little value due to his handling.
      OTT
        Kevin Labanc
        2021 6th round pick (SJS)
        5.
        SJS
        1. Reimer, James
        2. Suzuki, Ryan
        3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
        CAR
          Kevin Labanc
          2021 6th round pick (SJS)
          Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
          2021
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de FLA
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de NYI
          Logo de CAR
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de SJS
          2022
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de NYI
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de TBL
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de MIN
          2023
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de SJS
          Logo de SJS
          TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
          2781 500 000 $81 105 000 $0 $2 217 500 $395 000 $
          Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
          AG, AD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 5
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
          C
          M-NTC
          UFA - 7
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
          AD, AG
          UFA - 4
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
          AG, AD
          UFA - 3
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
          C
          M-NTC
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          735 000 $735 000 $
          AG, AD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
          AG, C, AD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          700 000 $700 000 $
          C
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          700 000 $700 000 $
          AD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
          AG, AD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
          AG, AD
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Panthers de la Floride
          925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
          AG, C
          RFA - 2
          Logo de Islanders de New York
          3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
          AD, AG, C
          M-NTC
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          700 000 $700 000 $
          AG, C
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Islanders de New York
          894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
          AG, AD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
          863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance710 000 $$710K)
          C, AG
          RFA - 1
          Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
          894 167 $894 167 $
          C
          RFA - 4
          Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
          DG/DD
          NMC
          UFA - 6
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
          DD
          NMC
          UFA - 7
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
          G
          M-NTC
          UFA - 4
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
          DG/DD
          UFA - 4
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
          DD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 5
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
          G
          M-NTC
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
          DG
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          750 000 $750 000 $
          DD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
          3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
          G
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          796 667 $796 667 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
          DG/DD
          UFA - 2
          Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          700 000 $700 000 $
          AG, AD
          UFA - 1
          Équipe de réserve
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
          G
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
          C
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          780 000 $780 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
          AG
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          768 333 $768 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
          AG, AD
          RFA - 1
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
          DG
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Sharks de San Jose
          700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
          C
          UFA - 1

          Code d'intégration

          • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
          • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

          Texte intégré

          Cliquer pour surligner
          8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 6
          #26
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 39,974
          Mentions "j'aime": 18,306
          Quoting: yikes
          Jesper Boqvists definitely has value but he hasn’t been given a role to thrive in yet. I’d think he doesn’t have as much value as he used to maybe getting better additional assets in a deal would happen but I do like him a lot personally. He’s got some real upside.


          Boqvist needs a change of scenery.
          Plenty of upside, plenty of speed and skill.
          Just needs a place where he can get minutes and grow his confidence.
          yikes a aimé ceci.
          8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 8
          #27
          Démarrer sujet
          EklundCelebriniSmith
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: sept. 2019
          Messages: 10,059
          Mentions "j'aime": 12,817
          Quoting: NHLfan10506
          Boqvist needs a change of scenery.
          Plenty of upside, plenty of speed and skill.
          Just needs a place where he can get minutes and grow his confidence.


          Yeah, where would he stand in value from NJD perspective?

          I’d say a first plus Jesper is “fair” but seems high especially if you have faith in Jesper to rebound as I agree he needs to be moved to a new team. On SJS I’d hope he’d replace Balcers spot in our top 6 for example; a role that he could thrive in if he performs.
          8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 9
          #28
          Bcarlo25
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2018
          Messages: 21,063
          Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
          Quoting: yikes
          Answer the question- because I wanna know if it’s even worth the time to try and have a discussion. Because I’m completely willing to have a convo about the value even if we disagree.


          I just don’t see what one has to do with the other.

          I haven’t wasted any energy thinking about Debrusks trade value because it’s stupid. His value to the bruins is worth more than his value on the market, and the bruins are looking to add.
          8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 10
          #29
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 39,974
          Mentions "j'aime": 18,306
          Quoting: yikes
          Yeah, where would he stand in value from NJD perspective?

          I’d say a first plus Jesper is “fair” but seems high especially if you have faith in Jesper to rebound as I agree he needs to be moved to a new team. On SJS I’d hope he’d replace Balcers spot in our top 6 for example; a role that he could thrive in if he performs.


          I think a good Boqvist deal is where is traded for someone in similar situation. Guy who needs restart.
          8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 12
          #30
          Démarrer sujet
          EklundCelebriniSmith
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: sept. 2019
          Messages: 10,059
          Mentions "j'aime": 12,817
          Modifié 8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 21
          Quoting: NHLfan10506
          I think a good Boqvist deal is where is traded for someone in similar situation. Guy who needs restart.


          Definitely think Jesper for Logan brown should be discussed by Ottawa and NJD

          Quoting: Bcarlo25
          I just don’t see what one has to do with the other.

          I haven’t wasted any energy thinking about Debrusks trade value because it’s stupid. His value to the bruins is worth more than his value on the market, and the bruins are looking to add.


          So Labanc who’s got good point totals this year, and has some great advanced stats on a dog water team (the Sharks); isn’t going to be worth a first? Hes better than Palmieri statistically and he just return a first basically (I know there was more involved in the deal). He’s worth more than a first to the Sharks and on the market Id safely assume a single first would be a gift to other teams and so why would we even consider less than a first? I’d expect if the Sharks said yeah just a first and a random prospect at least 5-10 teams would be speed dialling Wilson to bid or give their offers. If not more.
          8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 21
          #31
          Bcarlo25
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2018
          Messages: 21,063
          Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
          Quoting: yikes
          Definitely think Jesper for Logan brown should be discussed by Ottawa and NJD



          So Labanc who’s got good point totals this year, and has some great advanced stats on a dog water team (the Sharks); isn’t going to be worth a first? Hes better than Palmieri statistically and he just return a first basically (I know there was more involved in the deal). He’s worth more than a first to the Sharks and so why would we even consider less than a first? I’d expect if the Sharks said yeah just a first and a random prospect at least 5-10 teams would be speed dialing Wilson. If not more.


          I think it would be zero. He’s a solid third line player. 2nd and a low end prospect? Sure. I think a first is an outrageous ask for a player of his caliber.
          8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 29
          #32
          Démarrer sujet
          EklundCelebriniSmith
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: sept. 2019
          Messages: 10,059
          Mentions "j'aime": 12,817
          Quoting: Bcarlo25
          I think it would be zero. He’s a solid third line player. 2nd and a low end prospect? Sure. I think a first is an outrageous ask for a player of his caliber.


          What makes him a third line player? His time versus “elite”caliber players (per dom luszczyszyn) is more then 50% of the league. He’s got good totals and adv stats offensively and he’s playing top line for the Sharks and we kinda suck. Nothing evidently makes him a third liner. If he was Tampa I’d safely say he’d be deployed beside brayden point over his current line mates Palat or Johnson, potentially over Killorn on line 2.

          But the fact you say zero makes it sound like there’s literally no point in having a convo.
          8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 40
          #33
          Bcarlo25
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2018
          Messages: 21,063
          Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
          Quoting: yikes
          What makes him a third line player? His time versus “elite”caliber players (per dom luszczyszyn) is more then 50% of the league. He’s got good totals and adv stats offensively and he’s playing top line for the Sharks and we kinda suck. Nothing evidently makes him a third liner. If he was Tampa I’d safely say he’d be deployed beside brayden point over his current line mates Palat or Johnson, potentially over Killorn on line 2.

          But the fact you say zero makes it sound like there’s literally no point in having a convo.


          Don’t care about any of that advanced stat junk.

          His play makes him a third liner on any team that’s adding at the deadline. I tend to think how the player plays is more important than the stupid stats
          8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 58
          #34
          Démarrer sujet
          EklundCelebriniSmith
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: sept. 2019
          Messages: 10,059
          Mentions "j'aime": 12,817
          Quoting: Bcarlo25
          Don’t care about any of that advanced stat junk.

          His play makes him a third liner on any team that’s adding at the deadline. I tend to think how the player plays is more important than the stupid stats


          Yes as to why I asked if you watched Sharks game but you didn’t comment on that so I assume you don’t. 1-2 watched game sample sizes a year generally aren’t a good way to judge a player. It’s called using both eyes and stats - not just 1 or the other but hand in hand.
          8 avr. 2021 à 20 h 20
          #35
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 39,974
          Mentions "j'aime": 18,306
          Quoting: yikes
          Definitely think Jesper for Logan brown should be discussed by Ottawa and NJD

          So Labanc who’s got good point totals this year, and has some great advanced stats on a dog water team (the Sharks); isn’t going to be worth a first? Hes better than Palmieri statistically and he just return a first basically (I know there was more involved in the deal). He’s worth more than a first to the Sharks and on the market Id safely assume a single first would be a gift to other teams and so why would we even consider less than a first? I’d expect if the Sharks said yeah just a first and a random prospect at least 5-10 teams would be speed dialling Wilson to bid or give their offers. If not more.

          Interesting, but we are long in centers and short on d-men
          8 avr. 2021 à 20 h 26
          #36
          Bcarlo25
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2018
          Messages: 21,063
          Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
          Quoting: yikes
          Yes as to why I asked if you watched Sharks game but you didn’t comment on that so I assume you don’t. 1-2 watched game sample sizes a year generally aren’t a good way to judge a player. It’s called using both eyes and stats - not just 1 or the other but hand in hand.


          I’m a degenerate gambler. I bet against the sharks a lot. I’ve seen plenty of them.
          8 avr. 2021 à 20 h 37
          #37
          train, train
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2015
          Messages: 3,013
          Mentions "j'aime": 733
          Quoting: yikes
          Okay so what’s Debrusk worth than - because it’ll have a lot to do with your take on Labancs value.

          Because Labanc isn’t a mediocre player and I’ll assume you haven’t watched 90% of Sharks games. I’d be glad to be told I’m wrong but I’ll assume you haven’t as I a Sharks fan barely found it was worth it earlier this year.


          Ignore the bcarlo troll man... he hates the Sharks like his life depends on it.
          8 avr. 2021 à 22 h 4
          #38
          Hurricane Waddell
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2018
          Messages: 8,733
          Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
          Holy crap...that’s a lot of comments on one post, I couldn’t read them all. I think taking this much term and money, we will need to have Gardiner going the other way. If that isn’t in the deal, it probably doesn’t make much sense. We have a lot of extensions coming up.
          yikes a aimé ceci.
          8 avr. 2021 à 23 h 12
          #39
          Démarrer sujet
          EklundCelebriniSmith
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: sept. 2019
          Messages: 10,059
          Mentions "j'aime": 12,817
          Quoting: Caniac555
          Holy crap...that’s a lot of comments on one post, I couldn’t read them all. I think taking this much term and money, we will need to have Gardiner going the other way. If that isn’t in the deal, it probably doesn’t make much sense. We have a lot of extensions coming up.


          Most
          Comments are on the same page about the value suggested/ could be more due to Wilson saying he’s basically looking for a “overpay”.

          Anyways - Carolina is the one team paying the most (just cause I think Suzuki is the best asset suggested out of all the trades). I took Reimer cause he’s got no term I’d assume the most Canes would get back for him is a 3rd plus (not reimer hate I like him in this deal). I don’t think Gardiner can go to the Sharks so if they were to ever meet up in this scenario I’d think a third team would have to be involved if Gardiner was moving just cause of his term/ no actual spot for him
          to actually play, unless he wants 3rd pair or less time which obviously isn’t what he wants. In terms of value would you think if it was:

          Suzuki
          2nd
          -> SJS

          Labanc
          2021 6th round pick
          -> CAR

          Gardiner (is he more expensive to dump than a “3rds” value)
          SJS Prospect
          Maybe a Carolina 4th or something; they’d pay less then SJ but help move his contract
          -> 3rd Party

          Reimer traded elsewhere for a cap-less return Carolina can use like picks or whatever.
          9 avr. 2021 à 1 h 6
          #40
          John Leonard Viewer
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2020
          Messages: 1,325
          Mentions "j'aime": 444
          Quoting: Bcarlo25
          Including a first is legitimate insanity.


          Kapanen who?
          9 avr. 2021 à 8 h 50
          #41
          Bcarlo25
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2018
          Messages: 21,063
          Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
          Quoting: jfrojelin
          Kapanen who?


          What does kapanen have to do with this?
          9 avr. 2021 à 9 h 19
          #42
          NYI
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2016
          Messages: 3,484
          Mentions "j'aime": 1,103
          1) I can see the Isles giving up their 2022 1st after trading their 2020 and 2020 1sts already.
          2) Labanc is not worth a 1st.
          3) Labanc doesn't seem like a fit with the Isles. I can't see Trotz liking him. He's never coached a Labanc-like player before, and probably for a reason.
          4) I mean no disrespect to Labanc, I like him fine, but he's a flawed player on an overpaid contract. Seems like the type that plays well on a bad team but can't hang on a good team.
          9 avr. 2021 à 10 h 35
          #43
          John Leonard Viewer
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2020
          Messages: 1,325
          Mentions "j'aime": 444
          Quoting: Bcarlo25
          What does kapanen have to do with this?


          He got a first, and they're p similar
          9 avr. 2021 à 10 h 42
          #44
          Bcarlo25
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2018
          Messages: 21,063
          Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
          Quoting: jfrojelin
          He got a first, and they're p similar


          No they aren’t.
          9 avr. 2021 à 10 h 50
          #45
          John Leonard Viewer
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2020
          Messages: 1,325
          Mentions "j'aime": 444
          Quoting: Bcarlo25
          No they aren’t.


          8 month difference in age. A .09 difference in ppg difference with Kapanen playing with Crosby.
          11 avr. 2021 à 12 h 56
          #46
          Jinx god
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: sept. 2019
          Messages: 10,201
          Mentions "j'aime": 13,730
          What would it take for Dallas to get him?
          11 avr. 2021 à 13 h 22
          #47
          Démarrer sujet
          EklundCelebriniSmith
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: sept. 2019
          Messages: 10,059
          Mentions "j'aime": 12,817
          Quoting: EsoYeezus69
          What would it take for Dallas to get him?


          Idk if Dallas has the pieces. Harley I assume is a non starter obviously. That leaves Oettinger and Dellandrea. Oettinger I also assume is a non starter. After Dellandrea I don't think anyone else fits.

          That leaves Dellandrea who I assume can be seen in a few ways as:
          - I personally dont love him but dont think hes bad
          - He doesnt have much more to offer : Bottom 6 prospect
          - He has a lot more to give and patience is key.

          So Id say a first and ty but that can be seen as expensive if youre high on Dellandrea (and as I said I'm personally not but doesn't mean he isn't good). Whereas I view Dellandrea on the same page as Heponiemi and Bellows. I dont have him as the same value as Suzuki.

          Dallas would also need money moved so a cap move would be involved - whether its Comeau, or Cogs etc any Dallas would want gone would be involved (which can get a piece in return depending on whos involved etc).
          EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
          11 avr. 2021 à 13 h 38
          #48
          Jinx god
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: sept. 2019
          Messages: 10,201
          Mentions "j'aime": 13,730
          Quoting: yikes
          Idk if Dallas has the pieces. Harley I assume is a non starter obviously. That leaves Oettinger and Dellandrea. Oettinger I also assume is a non starter. After Dellandrea I don't think anyone else fits.

          That leaves Dellandrea who I assume can be seen in a few ways as:
          - I personally dont love him but dont think hes bad
          - He doesnt have much more to offer : Bottom 6 prospect
          - He has a lot more to give and patience is key.

          So Id say a first and ty but that can be seen as expensive if youre high on Dellandrea (and as I said I'm personally not but doesn't mean he isn't good). Whereas I view Dellandrea on the same page as Heponiemi and Bellows. I dont have him as the same value as Suzuki.

          Dallas would also need money moved so a cap move would be involved - whether its Comeau, or Cogs etc any Dallas would want gone would be involved (which can get a piece in return depending on whos involved etc).


          Otter and Harley are non starters as you stated.

          Dell would be on the same level as Suzuki, one was drafted 13th the other 28th, Dell was better in the WJ than Suzuki. He would be a 2-3 center depending on his development and he’s great two ways. I’ve seen a couple people compare him to NRob in terms of value. I would love to ship someone like Dobby for cap reasons, I don’t know if you would want him. Maybe something like Dell, a 2nd or a 3rd and Dobby? I’m clueless on his value, need some input.
          11 avr. 2021 à 14 h 0
          #49
          Démarrer sujet
          EklundCelebriniSmith
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: sept. 2019
          Messages: 10,059
          Mentions "j'aime": 12,817
          Quoting: EsoYeezus69
          Otter and Harley are non starters as you stated.

          Dell would be on the same level as Suzuki, one was drafted 13th the other 28th, Dell was better in the WJ than Suzuki. He would be a 2-3 center depending on his development and he’s great two ways. I’ve seen a couple people compare him to NRob in terms of value. I would love to ship someone like Dobby for cap reasons, I don’t know if you would want him. Maybe something like Dell, a 2nd or a 3rd and Dobby? I’m clueless on his value, need some input.


          Yeah personal preference I guess; I just have better expecations for Suzuki but as I said. Dellandrea isnt bad im just not in love.

          SJS has no need to pay for a goalie. Theyre trying out Korenar and Melnichuk to finish the year. If anything we'd just use free agency. We can help with cap but Idk if wed pay for someone.
          EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
          11 avr. 2021 à 14 h 6
          #50
          Jinx god
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: sept. 2019
          Messages: 10,201
          Mentions "j'aime": 13,730
          Quoting: yikes
          Yeah personal preference I guess; I just have better expecations for Suzuki but as I said. Dellandrea isnt bad im just not in love.

          SJS has no need to pay for a goalie. Theyre trying out Korenar and Melnichuk to finish the year. If anything we'd just use free agency. We can help with cap but Idk if wed pay for someone.


          Dallas probably won’t do anything at the TDL anyways, Nill is so lost he only wants players his age. It’s time we kick em to boot. The reason I want to move Dobby is because of Otter. Bish has a full NMC so it’s either Dobby or Otter, I would rather have Otter. Seattle will probably pick Dickinson because they have so many options at goalie. I just want to get for a good price but not many teams are willing to pay much for him. He also interferes with our mini 2 year re-tool because of cap reasons.
           
          Répondre
          To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
          Question:
          Options:
          Ajouter une option
          Soumettre le sondage