SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Defensemen gone at pick 7

Créé par: MartysBetter29
Équipe: 2021-22 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 8 avr. 2021
Publié: 8 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This one is way out of left field so don't take it too seriously. But if the top tier defensemen are gone by the time NJ picks in this years draft, looking at how they could best use that pick to get a premiere young defenseman. Idk if Ottawa would do it but straight up value wise they are doing well. #5 OA for #7OA, Zacha (our leading scorer at a position of need) and a replacement bottom pair young dman. I'd be assuming they drafted a top LD with their previous pick like Hughes or Power otherwise it wouldn't make much sense. If they did they would have Chabot, Hughes/Power, and Sanderson all on the left so it might make sense to move one to address other areas of greater need.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 000 000 $
31 750 000 $
31 750 000 $
21 900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
34 600 000 $
39 500 000 $
12 750 000 $
13 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
NJD
  1. Sanderson, Jake [Liste de réserve]
OTT
  1. Okhotiuk, Nikita
  2. Zacha, Pavel
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
#7OA
2.
NJD
  1. Foote, Cal [Droits de RFA]
TBL
  1. Wood, Miles (1 375 000 $ retained)
3.
NJD
TBL
  1. Subban, P.K.
Détails additionnels:
Seattle Expansion
4.
PHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de ARI
Logo de NJD
Logo de BUF
Logo de NJD
Logo de ARI
2022
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NYI
Logo de NJD
Logo de CBJ
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2023
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $66 726 930 $0 $4 240 000 $14 773 070 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 6
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 2
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
DG
RFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 822 764 $2 822 764 $ (1 697 764 $$2M1 697 764 $$2M)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $ (2 275 000 $$2M2 275 000 $$2M)
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 avr. 2021 à 2 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,346
Mentions "j'aime": 3,385
The draft isn't going to be out of defensemen by pick 7, but even if, somehow, there are no defensemen worth picking there, why would Ottawa trade their blue chip, 5th overall defenseman that they desperately need, for a pick that doesn't have any other defensemen worth taking?

They'll just keep Sanderson and take whoever they have as the BPA at their spot.
8 avr. 2021 à 2 h 48
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,983
Mentions "j'aime": 11,984
Modifié 8 avr. 2021 à 2 h 53
No chance in hell will Ottawa trade Jake Sanderson. He's going to be an absolute stud, and he's exactly the type of piece the Sens desperately need on the blueline. There are plenty of great D in this draft, but outside of Owen Power I don't think any of them match Sanderson's potential as a top pair Shutdown D.

That said, if Jersey is Picking 7th, they could easily still be landing a pretty nice Dman. I can see one of Edvinsson or Hughes being on the board still. It's a pretty murky draft and while I think the top 4 should be pretty clear (in no order Power, Guenther, Clarke Beniers) it's a bit of a crapshoot after that. I'm sure the Devils would be totally content with picking up a Hughes brother 7th overall. Even if both Edvinsson and Hughes go 5 and 6, it's not that big of a drop to take Carson Lambos after that.
MartysBetter29 a aimé ceci.
8 avr. 2021 à 2 h 50
#3
Démarrer sujet
MartysBetter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 785
Mentions "j'aime": 181
Quoting: Caerii
The draft isn't going to be out of defensemen by pick 7, but even if, somehow, there are no defensemen worth picking there, why would Ottawa trade their blue chip, 5th overall defenseman that they desperately need, for a pick that doesn't have any other defensemen worth taking?

They'll just keep Sanderson and take whoever they have as the BPA at their spot.


Again, its not super realistic and I get that. Also in the description I said it would only make sense if Ottawa went by BPA and drafted Hughes/Power (LHD) with pick #3 or whatever they end up with. With Chabot already there that would have them loaded on the left side. I don't think it's ideal asset management to project one of Chabot, Hughes/Power, or Sanderson forced to play 3rd pair when there are so many other areas of need on the team. Here you'd be getting Okothyuk (throw in, much more of a 3rd pair guy who shouldn't end up costing much $), Zacha (a 24yo center with 300 NHL games and 22 pts in 36 games this year who should be a top 6 player for Ottawa), and a 7OA pick in a pretty deep draft where you can take another BPA. You aren't getting rid of your blue-chip defenseman, you're just changing their name (Sanderson->Power) and gaining assets in the process.

Im not saying Ottawa has to do it that's just my thought process about why it could make sense. And if you're right and one of the top 3-4 defensemen is available at #7 then this is all for naught because NJ would probably just take them.
8 avr. 2021 à 2 h 54
#4
Démarrer sujet
MartysBetter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 785
Mentions "j'aime": 181
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
No chance in hell will Ottawa trade Jake Sanderson. He's going to be an absolute stud, and he's exactly the type of piece the Sens desperately need on the blueline. There are plenty of great D in this draft, but outside of Owen Power I don't think any of them match Sanderson's potential as a top pair Shutdown D.

That said, if Jersey is Picking 7th, they could easily still be landing a pretty nice Dman. I can see one of Edvinsson or Hughes being on the board still. It's a pretty murky draft and while I think the top 4 should be pretty clear (in no order Power, Guenther, Clarke Beniers) it's a bit of a crapshoot after that. I'm sure the Devils would be totally content with picking up a Hughes brother 7th overall.


I sure hope you're right. Hughes would probably be the dream for NJ. Incentivizes he and Jack to stay long term and maybe even Quinn to come over at some point. As for Ottawa I totally understand where you're coming from. I guess my question is what do you do if the BPA on the board at #3 or wherever you are picking is Power/Hughes? That would give Ottawa Chabot, Sanderson, and Power/Hughes, 3 LHD. With the lack of talent on the roster rn and so many areas to address, would it not be wise to look for ways to address other concerns via trades? Not saying it would be a Sanderson trade, I'll admit that is very far-fetched, but it could be a tricky situation to navigate.
8 avr. 2021 à 3 h 16
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,983
Mentions "j'aime": 11,984
Quoting: MartysBetter29
I sure hope you're right. Hughes would probably be the dream for NJ. Incentivizes he and Jack to stay long term and maybe even Quinn to come over at some point. As for Ottawa I totally understand where you're coming from. I guess my question is what do you do if the BPA on the board at #3 or wherever you are picking is Power/Hughes? That would give Ottawa Chabot, Sanderson, and Power/Hughes, 3 LHD. With the lack of talent on the roster rn and so many areas to address, would it not be wise to look for ways to address other concerns via trades? Not saying it would be a Sanderson trade, I'll admit that is very far-fetched, but it could be a tricky situation to navigate.


If Ottawa were to grab Power, the only thing it really changes for me, Is that I probably start shopping Erik Brannstrom for a high end RW prospect. For Sanderson though, I don't think it would hurt him much. He played a chunk of the season this year on the right side, and looked really strong. I don't think his game changes that much playing weak side or strong side. Play one of Sanderson or Power on their off side with Chabot and you have a guaranteed top 5 D pair in the league. Hell play them both together and have them shutdown the entire NHL, then let guys like Bernard-Docker and Zub fight it out for the spot with Chabot.

Honestly though if I'm picking 3rd, I think I'm just taking Guenther. I think he has the best offensive ceiling of anyone in the draft, and Ottawa is lacking a high end right shot winger besides Drake Batherson.
MartysBetter29 a aimé ceci.
8 avr. 2021 à 3 h 37
#6
Démarrer sujet
MartysBetter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 785
Mentions "j'aime": 181
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
If Ottawa were to grab Power, the only thing it really changes for me, Is that I probably start shopping Erik Brannstrom for a high end RW prospect. For Sanderson though, I don't think it would hurt him much. He played a chunk of the season this year on the right side, and looked really strong. I don't think his game changes that much playing weak side or strong side. Play one of Sanderson or Power on their off side with Chabot and you have a guaranteed top 5 D pair in the league. Hell play them both together and have them shutdown the entire NHL, then let guys like Bernard-Docker and Zub fight it out for the spot with Chabot.

Honestly though if I'm picking 3rd, I think I'm just taking Guenther. I think he has the best offensive ceiling of anyone in the draft, and Ottawa is lacking a high end right shot winger besides Drake Batherson.


Interesting, didn't know Sanderson has played time on the right side that would be very helpful in this hypothetical situation. I know for some guys its a seamless transition and other guys straight up can't do it. I go back and forth between BPA and position of need depending on the situation but come draft day I'll certainly be rooting for you guys to take Guenther or another forward. Selfishly I want as many defenseman as possible available when NJ is on the clock.
8 avr. 2021 à 8 h 54
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,075
Mentions "j'aime": 1,486
If all the high end defenceman are gone by the time the Devils pick they should take Eklund, Johnson, or Lysell. This team still needs a ton of help offensively
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage