SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2021 2022 Oilers

Créé par: cody_tugak
Équipe: 2021-22 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 7 avr. 2021
Publié: 7 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3825 000 $
3925 000 $
2925 000 $
2825 000 $
3825 000 $
3825 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
31 250 000 $
2825 000 $
2825 000 $
23 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2875 000 $
23 000 000 $
56 500 000 $
2875 000 $
1875 000 $
13 500 000 $
23 250 000 $
35 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
    Expansion Draft Seattle Kraken
    CGY
    1. Jones, Caleb
    2. Neal, James
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
    2.
    CBJ
    1. Rodrigue, Olivier
    2. Skinner, Stuart
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
    3.
    BOS
    1. Bear, Ethan
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de EDM
    2022
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2023
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $80 541 839 $669 339 $907 500 $958 161 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    834 167 $834 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    875 000 $875 000 $
    C
    UFA
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    875 000 $875 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    875 000 $875 000 $
    AG
    UFA
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    7 avr. 2021 à 1 h 46
    #1
    j_cash08
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 587
    Mentions "j'aime": 169
    Why would boston ever do that? Debrusk for Bear and a 3rd is laughable.
    7 avr. 2021 à 1 h 54
    #2
    CbjSabresDucks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 4,720
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
    Quoting: jcash08
    Why would boston ever do that? Debrusk for Bear and a 3rd is laughable.


    Its laughable because bear is better than DeBrusk.
    TheGreatBigMac, cody_tugak, Gregzky and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
    7 avr. 2021 à 1 h 55
    #3
    j_cash08
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 587
    Mentions "j'aime": 169
    Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
    Its laughable because bear is better than DeBrusk.


    in what world? based on what?
    7 avr. 2021 à 2 h 9
    #4
    Bruins fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 1,479
    Mentions "j'aime": 312
    Quoting: jcash08
    in what world? based on what?


    They don't need bear, or any RD for that matter. We need LD, top 4 LD.
    7 avr. 2021 à 4 h 31
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 346
    Mentions "j'aime": 76
    Quoting: jcash08
    in what world? based on what?


    Debrusk is having a down year, was scratched and his qualifying offer is sky high. He is a risky bet. Bear on the other hand is a low cost reliable, mobile top4 rd, those don't grow on trees. This trade is odd, I don't think the bruins want Bear and Debrusk's qo is too much risk for the oil.
    Gregzky et CD282 a aimé ceci.
    7 avr. 2021 à 6 h 2
    #6
    Vegan Commie Hipster
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 7,888
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
    Hey if the 3rd line is gonna suck anyways at least give it an identity I guess? Pretty good AGM. Overall.
    7 avr. 2021 à 6 h 7
    #7
    Vegan Commie Hipster
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 7,888
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
    If they also signed Galchenyuk they would become the first franchise in sports history to have employed the 4 top picks of a single entry draft at some point

    2012
    Yakupov
    Murray
    Galchenyuk
    GReinhart

    Of course the Oilers would do that with the worst top 4 of an entry draft in sports history though lol rolling eyes
    7 avr. 2021 à 6 h 13
    #8
    Vegan Commie Hipster
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 7,888
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
    Quoting: TheGreatBigMac
    Debrusk is having a down year, was scratched and his qualifying offer is sky high. He is a risky bet. Bear on the other hand is a low cost reliable, mobile top4 rd, those don't grow on trees. This trade is odd, I don't think the bruins want Bear and Debrusk's qo is too much risk for the oil.


    Idk sounds a bit like viewing one player with rose coloured glasses and the other player with a uh... less favourable colour of glasses... similar assets overall

    With Bear having played significant minutes on the top pair so far his QO leverage is quite high as well

    Debrusk with virtually no top line time naturally
    7 avr. 2021 à 7 h 37
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 11,493
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
    Quoting: TheGreatBigMac
    Debrusk is having a down year, was scratched and his qualifying offer is sky high. He is a risky bet. Bear on the other hand is a low cost reliable, mobile top4 rd, those don't grow on trees. This trade is odd, I don't think the bruins want Bear and Debrusk's qo is too much risk for the oil.


    DeBrusk also as had COVID and has admitted he has not mentally done well with be isolated from friends and family. Boston already has their top 4 RHD set.
    jcash08 a aimé ceci.
    7 avr. 2021 à 8 h 33
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 19,646
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
    No interest from Boston.
    jcash08 a aimé ceci.
    7 avr. 2021 à 8 h 50
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 6,449
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,962
    Absolute, complete, utter, unsalvagable fail on that Elvis trade. We're not trading either of our NHL goaltenders early unless we get something we really really badly need - and additional goaltending prospects are the last thing in the world we could ever want at this point. Just throw that one out; it has no hope.
    CD282 a aimé ceci.
    7 avr. 2021 à 12 h 2
    #12
    Bcarlo25
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 20,833
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
    Hard hard hard pass from boston.
    jcash08 a aimé ceci.
    7 avr. 2021 à 12 h 6
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 23,753
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,634
    Quoting: jcash08
    Why would boston ever do that? Debrusk for Bear and a 3rd is laughable.


    Why would Edmonton ever do that??
    7 avr. 2021 à 12 h 18
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 23,753
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,634
    Quoting: Radu47
    With Bear having played significant minutes on the top pair so far his QO leverage is quite high as well


    I'm not sure what you're trying to say here, but Bear's QO is governed by the CBA MOU, it has nothing to do with his on-ice performance.
    7 avr. 2021 à 12 h 21
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 23,753
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,634
    When the Oilers can buyout James Neal for just a $1.9M cap hit, why are you throwing a 1st (in the deepest draft in a generation) AND a good young defenseman at Seattle to take him?
    7 avr. 2021 à 12 h 59
    #16
    j_cash08
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 587
    Mentions "j'aime": 169
    Quoting: TheGreatBigMac
    Debrusk is having a down year, was scratched and his qualifying offer is sky high. He is a risky bet. Bear on the other hand is a low cost reliable, mobile top4 rd, those don't grow on trees. This trade is odd, I don't think the bruins want Bear and Debrusk's qo is too much risk for the oil.


    Bear is at a low cost because quite frankly he isn't good. Saying he is a top 4 defenseman is a stretch. He might be a top 4 defenseman on the oilers because they can't play defense. Having a down year amid shortened seasons and a pandemic while battling injuries and covid doesn't suddenly decrease debrusk's value that much. Debrusk for a third pairing defenseman will never happen.
    8 avr. 2021 à 2 h 1
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 346
    Mentions "j'aime": 76
    Quoting: jcash08
    Bear is at a low cost because quite frankly he isn't good. Saying he is a top 4 defenseman is a stretch. He might be a top 4 defenseman on the oilers because they can't play defense. Having a down year amid shortened seasons and a pandemic while battling injuries and covid doesn't suddenly decrease debrusk's value that much. Debrusk for a third pairing defenseman will never happen.


    Rumor is Boston is trying to get Hall. I doubt that would be a priority if Debrusk was getting it done, seeing as how you have Marchand and Ritchie on lw already. Disagree with your assessment of Bear, he is low cost because he is an RFA. Anyway, I'm not interested in this trade, so I'll leave it at that.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage