SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A good trade deadline

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 6 avr. 2021
Publié: 6 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Tuch, Luke [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
Conditional pick: If Montreal makes the playoffs the pick is transferred.
MTL
  1. Janmark, Mattias
Détails additionnels:
Good third ;one forward to help replace Gallager while he's injured. Most people I've seen on here don't mind paying at least a 2nd for him.

Gallagher should be good for the playoffs.
2.
CHI
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Salary moved to accommodate a Hall trade.
TOR
  1. Carpenter, Ryan
  2. Söderberg, Carl
Détails additionnels:
Depth players, good for a run.
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (COL)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de COL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $49 308 814 $1 090 244 $5 157 500 $32 191 186 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance25 000 $$25K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 avr. 2021 à 17 h 3
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,211
Mentions "j'aime": 10,557
Who's taking over Montréal in the race?
6 avr. 2021 à 17 h 6
#2
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,776
Mentions "j'aime": 5,734
Quoting: Gmonwy
Who's taking over Montréal in the race?


It's more about the injury. They play the flames a lot down the stretch, given it's unlikely... If flames win all of those games they are in and MTL is out.
6 avr. 2021 à 17 h 13
#3
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,653
Mentions "j'aime": 10,231
I don't see Montreal trading Tuch, he's looking like a steal right now.
Remus a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2021 à 17 h 13
#4
HutsonNorlinderGuhle
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 2,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,377
I like the idea of Janmark, but not at that price and Bergy doesn't like trading prospects
6 avr. 2021 à 17 h 23
#5
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,776
Mentions "j'aime": 5,734
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
I don't see Montreal trading Tuch, he's looking like a steal right now.


Could be a second, but really I want one of Tuch or Jan Mysak. I think Janmark would be a good fit in MTL and I could see an extension for him if you can get rid of Byron.
6 avr. 2021 à 17 h 28
#6
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,653
Mentions "j'aime": 10,231
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Could be a second, but really I want one of Tuch or Jan Mysak. I think Janmark would be a good fit in MTL and I could see an extension for him if you can get rid of Byron.


I know you want them because they are both looking great! I think Berg would rather trade a 2nd. I don't think he likes the draft being in this year.
6 avr. 2021 à 17 h 31
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,197
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
good players but not at that price
6 avr. 2021 à 17 h 32
#8
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,776
Mentions "j'aime": 5,734
Quoting: leafs101
good players but not at that price


The price for either is likely a third, I think this is a good deal because you clear Kerfoots cap. I would look at that aspect first.
6 avr. 2021 à 17 h 46
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,241
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Could be a second, but really I want one of Tuch or Jan Mysak. I think Janmark would be a good fit in MTL and I could see an extension for him if you can get rid of Byron.


Flames are 6 points back right now and Montreal has 4 games in hand if the flames did manage to win all 5 remaining games they would still have to count on Montreal playing at less than .500 hockey. That I a lot to count on, also the trade makes little sense as well when we have Armia coming back this week or next week and Frolik, Evans, Caufield, and Poehling among others we don't need another depth winger.
6 avr. 2021 à 17 h 49
#10
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,776
Mentions "j'aime": 5,734
Quoting: Campabee
Flames are 6 points back right now and Montreal has 4 games in hand if the flames did manage to win all 5 remaining games they would still have to count on Montreal playing at less than .500 hockey. That I a lot to count on, also the trade makes little sense as well when we have Armia coming back this week or next week and Frolik, Evans, Caufield, and Poehling among others we don't need another depth winger.


It's unlikely, but not impossible. I think Janmark is a better addition than all of the guys you mentioned because he brings a two way game. You can't count on Caufield to play a Janmark role.
6 avr. 2021 à 18 h 1
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,241
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
It's unlikely, but not impossible. I think Janmark is a better addition than all of the guys you mentioned because he brings a two way game. You can't count on Caufield to play a Janmark role.


Caufield plays a decent 2 way game. Granato and the Badgers staff helped him develop the 2 way game and he brings a much more needed aspect, goal scoring! Armia is better than Janmark and Poehling has been living up to his draft pedigree this season. Evans is also solid defensively, so like I said Janmark is not needed.

Edit** sorry I meant Armia is equal to Janmark defensively
6 avr. 2021 à 18 h 21
#12
Mayo Chicken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Is Subban really that much better than JoJo? I don't know that it's even worth losing the 4th.
6 avr. 2021 à 18 h 48
#13
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,776
Mentions "j'aime": 5,734
Quoting: CalderMakar
Is Subban really that much better than JoJo? I don't know that it's even worth losing the 4th.

Could be. It's a low risk deal in any case.
6 avr. 2021 à 19 h 0
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,526
Mentions "j'aime": 491
don't think the leafs do that, kerf has been good recently
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage