SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks Acquire Sam Reinhart

Créé par: CheechYou
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 6 avr. 2021
Publié: 6 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
2.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $74 185 000 $0 $445 000 $7 315 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
735 000 $735 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
723 333 $723 333 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
780 000 $780 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
736 666 $736 666 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 avr. 2021 à 14 h 11
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,014
Mentions "j'aime": 422
Thats kinda overpay ngl
6 avr. 2021 à 14 h 11
#2
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 238
Mentions "j'aime": 116
no no no we are not trading 1st round picks
Madhatter et CheechYou a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2021 à 14 h 14
#3
Démarrer sujet
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,996
Mentions "j'aime": 730
Help me out guys I know this is an overypay. I don't think this is what it would take to get him. Ozzy+Gregor+a 2nd? Or just the first?

Reinhart would be the perfect add IMO.
LeafsFanZay a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2021 à 14 h 17
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,014
Mentions "j'aime": 422
Quoting: CheechYou
Help me out guys I know this is an overypay. I don't think this is what it would take to get him. Ozzy+Gregor+a 2nd? Or just the first?

Reinhart would be the perfect add IMO.


Gambrell and two seconds should to it
Dont think SJS should trade Ozzy right now
CheechYou, Madhatter, Klara and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2021 à 14 h 17
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Good target but its alot. I would also rather deal Merks than Ozzy I think. Im not convinced Merkley will work in SJ
CheechYou, LeafsFanZay et Klara a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2021 à 14 h 20
#6
Démarrer sujet
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,996
Mentions "j'aime": 730
Quoting: papishark
Good target but its alot. I would also rather deal Merks than Ozzy I think. Im not convinced Merkley will work in SJ


If the Sharks end up keeping Burns post-SEA-draft, I'd be a lot more inclined to trade Merks instead of Ozzy. But I have the feeling Burns will go to SEA and SJ's been marinating Merks with the Cuda to prep him for next season to pick up some of Burns' absence. He's progressing well too in the AHL as the season's worn on.
papishark a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2021 à 14 h 22
#7
Démarrer sujet
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,996
Mentions "j'aime": 730
Quoting: LeafsFanZay
Gambrell and two seconds should to it
Dont think SJS should trade Ozzy right now


I'll update to have something similar to this reflected (Ozzy + Gregor) instead of including the 1st in there too.
6 avr. 2021 à 14 h 31
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 48
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Reinhart is a pending RFA who is likely looking to get out of Buffalo. That means he is going to be hard for Buffalo to sign. I doubt acquiring him costs a 1st or any blue chip prospects.
papishark et CheechYou a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2021 à 14 h 40
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 696
Quoting: papishark
Good target but its alot. I would also rather deal Merks than Ozzy I think. Im not convinced Merkley will work in SJ


Agree. I think his attitude issues persist and he really doesn't go anywhere
6 avr. 2021 à 14 h 41
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: MMXD
Agree. I think his attitude issues persist and he really doesn't go anywhere


I dont care about the attitude, I just dont think hes got the effort to ever get a chance on a team like SJ. Hes a lazy but talented RHD that the sharks just have no room for.
6 avr. 2021 à 15 h 44
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,531
Mentions "j'aime": 819
buf decline. not the right pieces. Labanc or hertl would interest us
6 avr. 2021 à 15 h 49
#12
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
Quoting: MMXD
Agree. I think his attitude issues persist and he really doesn't go anywhere


it isn't his attitude, its that your average 16 year old plays better defense than him.
6 avr. 2021 à 15 h 51
#13
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
Quoting: Sabres_Insider
buf decline. not the right pieces. Labanc or hertl would interest us


absolutely no chance Hertl is traded for Reinhart, I would consider Labanc + 2nd though.
Sabres_Insider a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2021 à 15 h 53
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,531
Mentions "j'aime": 819
Quoting: Klara
absolutely no chance Hertl is traded for Reinhart, I would consider Labanc + 2nd though.


labanc, 2nd and a b prospect. probably going to turn into a bidding war IF Buf wants to trade him
6 avr. 2021 à 15 h 54
#15
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
Quoting: Sabres_Insider
labanc, 2nd and a b prospect. probably going to turn into a bidding war IF Buf wants to trade him


Labanc + 2nd would be the highest I see SJ going, literally nothing more, especially additional prospects. In that case, no to Reinhart to SJ.
Sabres_Insider a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2021 à 16 h 49
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,421
Mentions "j'aime": 313
Quoting: CheechYou
Help me out guys I know this is an overypay. I don't think this is what it would take to get him. Ozzy+Gregor+a 2nd? Or just the first?

Reinhart would be the perfect add IMO.


2021 1st (if pick is below top-10) and Blichfeld.

We just rebuilt the chemistry in the locker room, and the top-line is set, so nobody's trading Labanc. Burns is a big part of our chemistry too, so I expect him to stay in SJ post expansion.

If it's Merkley instead of Blichfeld, then I'd expect a 2021 2nd coming back (which I'd use to select Sebastian Cossa), although that might cost us an extra 4th or something... at this point we're in the weeds, but you get it.
CheechYou a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2021 à 17 h 9
#17
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
I think SJS has to admit. Most likely going in the SEA draft is simek.
6 avr. 2021 à 19 h 55
#18
Démarrer sujet
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,996
Mentions "j'aime": 730
Quoting: Ihaveajoner
I think SJS has to admit. Most likely going in the SEA draft is simek.


I'm hoping they protect ek65 vlasic and simek on D, that way Burns is exposed. I like Burns obviously and prefer him over Simek, it's just the scenario of the Sharks having so many big contracts and 30+ players and one of them needing to go and burns I think makes the most sense to go with his age and bc we have EK65 at least and Merkley waiting.

It's a question of will SEA take Burns and/or will SEA take Burns with a sweetener that isn't a 1st rounder or 1st round pick of ours.
6 avr. 2021 à 20 h 43
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,421
Mentions "j'aime": 313
Quoting: CheechYou
I'm hoping they protect ek65 vlasic and simek on D, that way Burns is exposed. I like Burns obviously and prefer him over Simek, it's just the scenario of the Sharks having so many big contracts and 30+ players and one of them needing to go and burns I think makes the most sense to go with his age and bc we have EK65 at least and Merkley waiting.

It's a question of will SEA take Burns and/or will SEA take Burns with a sweetener that isn't a 1st rounder or 1st round pick of ours.


Burns is core, Simek isn't... that's why I think Simek gets exposed, doesn't mean he gets selected though. Burns is also a lot harder to replace than Simek, even with his age; he's still very effective offensively and is even evolving his defensive game, which has certainly improved.
6 avr. 2021 à 21 h 45
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 696
Quoting: Klara
it isn't his attitude, its that your average 16 year old plays better defense than him.


Merkley had many attitude issues in the O, which actually caused Guelph to basically tell him to get lost.
6 avr. 2021 à 21 h 52
#21
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
Quoting: MMXD
Merkley had many attitude issues in the O, which actually caused Guelph to basically tell him to get lost.


Have you watched him this year?
6 avr. 2021 à 22 h 54
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,878
Mentions "j'aime": 974
Quoting: LeafsFanZay
Gambrell and two seconds should to it
Dont think SJS should trade Ozzy right now


Not even remotely close lol
15 avr. 2021 à 13 h 36
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 696
Quoting: Klara
Have you watched him this year?


Not talking about skill. He has the skill, it's his attitude
16 avr. 2021 à 14 h 57
#24
Démarrer sujet
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,996
Mentions "j'aime": 730
Quoting: JumboFett
Burns is still very effective offensively and is even evolving his defensive game, which has certainly improved.


As much as this was being touted and maybe rightfully so last season, this season's been a different story. 0 goals in his last 21 games and so many defensive lapses which have directly led to opposing goals. Hedi's called him out on it a few of the times.
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 50
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,421
Mentions "j'aime": 313
Quoting: CheechYou
As much as this was being touted and maybe rightfully so last season, this season's been a different story. 0 goals in his last 21 games and so many defensive lapses which have directly led to opposing goals. Hedi's called him out on it a few of the times.


0 goals but plenty of assists. I mean, we still love Cooch, but he's in a drought right now too.

Harsh reality is once Pavs left Burns had no one to tip his shots in. Our whole team is built upon the garbage goal, bomb-the-net approach, but we still don't have that solid net-front guy. We either gotta get a new guy or change our game completely. Leno has been practicing tip-ins, so has Gambrell and Donato -- I also hear Reedy was one of the best tippers in the NCAA -- but none of them come close to what Pavs could do... Not yet anyway.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage