SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

could we take 4 players from Jersey

Créé par: Bdawwwgy1
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 5 avr. 2021
Publié: 5 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Palmieri, Kyle (2 325 000 $ retained)
  2. Wedgewood, Scott
  3. Wood, Miles (1 200 000 $ retained)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
  5. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Abruzzese, Nick [Liste de réserve]
  2. Brooks, Adam
  3. Hutchinson, Michael
  4. Kokkonen, Mikko [Liste de réserve]
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Abruzzese is really really good

brooks and hutch for wedgewood,
Palms for kokkonen and a first
Wood for Abruzzese and a 2nd

two fourths go back because i personally feel like toronto is overpaying
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
NYI
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
Détails additionnels:
anywhere.
3.
TOR
  1. Ullmark, Linus
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
BUF
  1. Andersen, Frederik
  2. Koster, Mike [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
4.
NJD
  1. Rubins, Kristians
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de NJD
Logo de MTL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de NJD
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 949 741 $0 $0 $3 550 259 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
0 $0 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
874 125 $874 125 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
805 833 $805 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 avr. 2021 à 0 h 6
#26
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,179
Mentions "j'aime": 9,152
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I think Amirov and Foote are similar. Amirov higher ceiling, lower floor.
Mercer may be better than both.
Mukhamadullin ... ?? Who knows what he is. Need to see him in some best-vs-best competitions. I’d take Sandin over him today.

Wood has more term. And was injured for most of last year.
Coleman has him on versatility (plays PK, PP, both sides, any line). Wood has edge on size, speed, toughness.

Oh Wood has more term, for some reason I didn't think that.
Still, I'd be cautious to pay a 1st round level prospect and a first for him.
There would have to be retention for him to get that, and even then since he's not better than Coleman I doubt it even then.
6 avr. 2021 à 1 h 35
#27
SLIMY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 267
Mentions "j'aime": 55
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
problem is amirov is WAY better than foote and mercer and sandin is way better than Muk at this time. sorry man, but i heavily disagree here. hopefully a week from now one of us can look back at this and laugh lol


I am not a too high on Foote compared to the experts and insiders, but way better is a stretch. TSN rankings have Foote higher than Amirov, and he would be significantly higher in last year's list. I like amirov and I see a lot of potential there. On upside alone, its kinda of close, maybe a slight edge to Amirov in my book. In terms of NHL readiness and likelihood of being a full time NHLer in the near future Foote runs away with it.
6 avr. 2021 à 1 h 37
#28
SLIMY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 267
Mentions "j'aime": 55
Quoting: Saskleaf
Oh Wood has more term, for some reason I didn't think that.
Still, I'd be cautious to pay a 1st round level prospect and a first for him.
There would have to be retention for him to get that, and even then since he's not better than Coleman I doubt it even then.


He is also RFA at expiry.
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2021 à 9 h 56
#29
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,179
Mentions "j'aime": 9,152
Quoting: Slimycoldcutswork
He is also RFA at expiry.


Still, he's clearly not as good as Coleman. Not worth quite as much.
6 avr. 2021 à 12 h 50
#30
Sabres are elite
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,979
Mentions "j'aime": 3,299
Quoting: Smitty426
Way wrong on Kulikov
Palms and Wood are on target
No need for Wedgewood but he's better than your suggesting
I'm watching Leafs now and Kerfoot is a rag doll, I'm not impressed


Kulikov isn't good. Any team giving up more than a 5th is overpaying. But I guess we will see, I'm expecting a 5th or 6th for him
6 avr. 2021 à 17 h 6
#31
SLIMY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 267
Mentions "j'aime": 55
Quoting: Saskleaf
Still, he's clearly not as good as Coleman. Not worth quite as much.


they are different players but I think coleman is better. still hes worth more than blake coleman to almost any team in this league. Perhaps VGK and Tampa being the only exception, where his need for a new contract would cause problems retaining more important players. The fact that he is an RFA basically means you get him for another contract, and he will have limited bargaining power. 2 years at the very least, likely 4+. Coleman will be a 30 year old UFA signing when the season starts in 2021-2022 and TBL knows they cant afford to re-sign him. miles wood is 25.
6 avr. 2021 à 19 h 54
#32
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,179
Mentions "j'aime": 9,152
Quoting: Slimycoldcutswork
they are different players but I think coleman is better. still hes worth more than blake coleman to almost any team in this league. Perhaps VGK and Tampa being the only exception, where his need for a new contract would cause problems retaining more important players. The fact that he is an RFA basically means you get him for another contract, and he will have limited bargaining power. 2 years at the very least, likely 4+. Coleman will be a 30 year old UFA signing when the season starts in 2021-2022 and TBL knows they cant afford to re-sign him. miles wood is 25.


Oh, I know what an RFA is.
But I'm just saying he's a clear step behind Coleman. Just because a player's contract situation is better does not mean you completely ignore the fact he's not as good.
7 avr. 2021 à 16 h 28
#33
Sabres are elite
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,979
Mentions "j'aime": 3,299
Quoting: NHLfan10506
All those guys wouldn’t get Smith alone.
If you think Miles Wood can be had for a 2nd, Kulikov for 6th...I just don’t know what to tell you. Stay away from video games, I guess.


You are blinded by your bias. Those Devils players are not fetching those returns. Take a look at Kulikov's advanced stats for example and you will clearly see he is not a good player: https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/k/kulikdm01-advanced.html

Kulikov career Corsi = 48%
Maatta career Corsi = 50.1% https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/m/maattol01.html

Maatta is widely regarded as a bad player, and yet he is still better than Kulikov
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage