SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Thinking out loud

Créé par: dpdan
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 3 avr. 2021
Publié: 3 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Only way that I would give up a 1st or Studnika would be for a young player with term (or RFA) who is already performing at a top 6 level. Coyotes get back into the 1st and pick up a young C with top 6 potential. Also save $ in the short term as Studs has longer to go on his rookie deal.

The Murray deal stabilizes the left side a bit as he is more reliable in his own end then Lauzon or Zboril. NJ gets a young bottom 6 winger that needs an opportunity for playing time and another dart to throw at the draft.

I realize that this has Bs over the cap but the Murray $ will be prorated so it’s not the full ticket.

Of course all of this is moot if Tuukka isn’t 100%
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Studnicka, Jack
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
2.
NJD
  1. Senyshyn, Zach
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $82 017 314 $964 222 $2 300 000 $-517 314 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 avr. 2021 à 16 h 41
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
ARI could want more and I don't think the Bruins want to move Studnicka. For the NJ deal, it depends how much the Devils value Senyshyn, wouldn't be surprised if they want a 3rd instead.
3 avr. 2021 à 16 h 46
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 295
Mentions "j'aime": 42
Quoting: bhavikp27
ARI could want more and I don't think the Bruins want to move Studnicka. For the NJ deal, it depends how much the Devils value Senyshyn, wouldn't be surprised if they want a 3rd instead.


What do you think a Garland deal looks like? And what’s the highest you’d go if you’re the Bs?

As for Murray, are you saying Zach plus the 3rd or just the 3rd and if it’s Zach and a 4th or just a 3rd, which would you rather do as a Bs fan?

Appreciate the feedback👍
3 avr. 2021 à 16 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Quoting: dpdan
What do you think a Garland deal looks like? And what’s the highest you’d go if you’re the Bs?

As for Murray, are you saying Zach plus the 3rd or just the 3rd and if it’s Zach and a 4th or just a 3rd, which would you rather do as a Bs fan?

Appreciate the feedback👍


Per Ellliotte Friedman from Sportsnet, the Coyotes don't want late picks otherwise they want prospects included. The Bruins are probably picking late and they only have couple B prospects so I don't see a Garland to BOS trade that would make sense for both sides. I think it's better for the Bruins to trade for a rental like Palmieri.

I don't know if NJ would prefer to free up the roster spot and give a chance to someone they already have in their organization or if they would take Senyshyn. 3rd+Senyshyn, if they want to do it, fine.
3 avr. 2021 à 17 h 1
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 295
Mentions "j'aime": 42
Quoting: bhavikp27
Per Ellliotte Friedman from Sportsnet, the Coyotes don't want late picks otherwise they want prospects included. The Bruins are probably picking late and they only have couple B prospects so I don't see a Garland to BOS trade that would make sense for both sides. I think it's better for the Bruins to trade for a rental like Palmieri.

I don't know if NJ would prefer to free up the roster spot and give a chance to someone they already have in their organization or if they would take Senyshyn. 3rd+Senyshyn, if they want to do it, fine.


I guess that my issue is if Palmieri is going to cost a 1st anyways, I’d rather go one step further and include Studs and maybe another prospect to get Garland who helps them for this year and the future. I get that AZ wants a high pick and if a team with a top pick want to trade it for CG then I’d tip my cap to them, but if I’m Sweeney I’m calling everyday till I get an answer
3 avr. 2021 à 17 h 2
#5
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,810
Mentions "j'aime": 4,449
Arizona declines.

New Jersey accepts.
3 avr. 2021 à 17 h 2
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,089
Mentions "j'aime": 18,337
Value-wise, Murray deal is ok. He is probably worth 3rd or 4th.
Assuming Arizona declines Garland offer...
So maybe NJD offers Palmieri and Murray for Studnicka, Senyshen and picks (and whatever retention is needed).
Or similar type deal.
Devils want young players over picks.
3 avr. 2021 à 17 h 4
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Quoting: dpdan
I guess that my issue is if Palmieri is going to cost a 1st anyways, I’d rather go one step further and include Studs and maybe another prospect to get Garland who helps them for this year and the future. I get that AZ wants a high pick and if a team with a top pick want to trade it for CG then I’d tip my cap to them, but if I’m Sweeney I’m calling everyday till I get an answer


The management doesn't want to trade Studnicka because they see him as top6 C after Krejci/Bergeron are gone and he's the only forward/center with top6 upside, that's why they're reticent to include him in a deal (teams probably tried to acquire him in the past). I understand their decision but I get your point too.
dpdan a aimé ceci.
3 avr. 2021 à 17 h 5
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,724
Mentions "j'aime": 535
I honestly don't see a trade that works between ARZ & BOS for garland
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage