SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs at the deadline

Créé par: Canuck54
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 2 avr. 2021
Publié: 2 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Hållander, Filip
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Aubé-Kubel, Nicolas
  2. Elliott, Brian
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (PHI)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (PHI)
3.
TOR
  1. Fabbri, Robby
Détails additionnels:
Low round pick goes to PHI making it a three-team deal
DET
4.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de PHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $79 676 255 $0 $0 $1 823 745 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 137 500 $2 137 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 avr. 2021 à 7 h 52
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,310
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
Modifié 2 avr. 2021 à 8 h 0
That PHI trade is diabolical. Barabanov is a contract. Hes a AHL/NHL tweener and every team in the nhl has 5-6 of those guys. NAK is probably the most value player in that deal. Andersen really has NO value higher than Elliot, and Philly adds 3 high picks? Why does PHI do that? Why would Philly want those players? And why would they add good picks?

Other than the Rakell deal, all those deals are Maple Leaf junk. Engvall is similar to Barabanov and Brooks, Rosen have value?

Doubt DET does that Fabbri deal, its a bunch of okay players for one good one. Whenever you have 4 pieces for 1, you have ask yourself if its just quantity for quality.

Theres ideas and then theres offensive proposals thrown out to irritate people
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 avr. 2021 à 8 h 16
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Hammerwise
That PHI trade is diabolical. Barabanov is a contract. Hes a AHL/NHL tweener and every team in the nhl has 5-6 of those guys. NAK is probably the most value player in that deal. Andersen really has NO value higher than Elliot, and Philly adds 3 high picks? Why does PHI do that? Why would Philly want those players? And why would they add good picks?

Other than the Rakell deal, all those deals are Maple Leaf junk. Engvall is similar to Barabanov and Brooks, Rosen have value?

Doubt DET does that Fabbri deal, its a bunch of okay players for one good one. Whenever you have 4 pieces for 1, you have ask yourself if its just quantity for quality.

Theres ideas and then theres offensive proposals thrown out to irritate people


While I think your are overly critical of much of the value here. I will say this is all needless nonsense that doesn't make TO better and changing 4 roster players with 10 games to play would more than likely back fire since who knows how players react to the new system. This is all dumb
2 avr. 2021 à 9 h 5
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,676
Mentions "j'aime": 24,592
Tooo much for Rakell. A first or second (depending upon your evaluation) and Topi Niemela is sufficient.
Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
2 avr. 2021 à 9 h 23
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,975
Mentions "j'aime": 841
So you’re really going all in, tbh I like the team now how it is
Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
2 avr. 2021 à 9 h 29
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,310
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
While I think your are overly critical of much of the value here. I will say this is all needless nonsense that doesn't make TO better and changing 4 roster players with 10 games to play would more than likely back fire since who knows how players react to the new system. This is all dumb


Yes, youre reight, I was overly critical, but the Philly trade is diabolical. And it doesn;t really even think about what PHI wants/needs.

and way too many trades list a bunch of never-weres, newver-will bes as value. In this Leaf example, these guys like Brooks, Rosen have pretty much no value (same with marincin) but mean the other team loses another contract space, and presenting guys like Barbanov and Engvall as value is pretty false as well. Sometimes you get the right guy in the right spot, but engvall, barabanov are AHL/NHL tweeners (like MTL's Weal) who every team has a handful of these guys, but they don;t move the barometer in trades for value.

Its the same names over and over, with this false belief that they are not who they are, or that teams will trade value for players who have less, its Jeremy Bracco-itis....
2 avr. 2021 à 9 h 41
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Hammerwise
Yes, youre reight, I was overly critical, but the Philly trade is diabolical. And it doesn;t really even think about what PHI wants/needs.

and way too many trades list a bunch of never-weres, newver-will bes as value. In this Leaf example, these guys like Brooks, Rosen have pretty much no value (same with marincin) but mean the other team loses another contract space, and presenting guys like Barbanov and Engvall as value is pretty false as well. Sometimes you get the right guy in the right spot, but engvall, barabanov are AHL/NHL tweeners (like MTL's Weal) who every team has a handful of these guys, but they don;t move the barometer in trades for value.

Its the same names over and over, with this false belief that they are not who they are, or that teams will trade value for players who have less, its Jeremy Bracco-itis....


Engvall is a good player. He's very strong defensively but doesn't offer much offense. I am happy with him.
Sign_em_up000000 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 avr. 2021 à 9 h 43
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Detroit doesn’t touch that. Fabbri is our stop gap 2C (he’s paced in the 50s in Detroit) so why would we trade him for a bunch of quantity?
2 avr. 2021 à 11 h 6
#8
Daddy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 789
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Yes let's bring in 6 new roster players at the deadline lolol. Help in net and top 6/middle 6 forward is our priority. Then we could also bring in a depth dman to sure up the 3rd pair like Merrill or Kulikov for 3rd, probably even a 4th will get get one of those deals done. We bring in maximum 3 new guys at the deadline. I think realistically it will be 1-2.
Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
2 avr. 2021 à 22 h 12
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Tooo much for Rakell. A first or second (depending upon your evaluation) and Topi Niemela is sufficient.


What would you want to swap Niemela for Liljegren?
2 avr. 2021 à 22 h 13
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: mitchmarner16
So you’re really going all in, tbh I like the team now how it is


Agree, but it would be wise to make a trade or two to add depth IMO.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
3 avr. 2021 à 10 h 42
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,975
Mentions "j'aime": 841
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
Agree, but it would be wise to make a trade or two to add depth IMO.

Yep, incase someone like muzzin goes down like last year
OldNYIfan et Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
3 avr. 2021 à 11 h 12
#12
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,676
Mentions "j'aime": 24,592
Modifié 3 avr. 2021 à 20 h 17. Raison: corrected mis-spelling
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
What would you want to swap Niemela for Liljegren?


A second and Liljegren would be thrilling. We would retain 50%.

In truth, in the real world it might take as little as Liljegren and a fourth.
Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
3 avr. 2021 à 20 h 14
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: mitchmarner16
Yep, incase someone like muzzin goes down like last year


Exactly, and if we can add a top 6 forward it will push everyone down creating better depth/quality.
3 avr. 2021 à 20 h 18
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: OldNYIfan
A second and Liljegren would be thrilling. We would retain 50%.

I truth, in the real world it might take as little as Liljegren and a fourth.


That sounds very reasonable too me. I would make it a second because I think that's fair or at the very least split the difference. I'm also still high on Lilly, however, I admit his ceiling is lower than previously anticipated. He will IMO be a serviceable NHL player, most likely a a bottom 4 d but still valuable. That being said I don't think our FO is that high on him anymore and if so I'd like to see him go to a team that will give him a chance.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage