SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NJD wants Prospects over Picks

Créé par: NHLfan10506
Équipe: 2020-21 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 31 mars 2021
Publié: 1 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Devils GM has said he wants prospects over picks for his rentals and Leafs GM has said he is willing to move prospects in acquisitions (anyone except Sandin, I believe). Gotta think there may be fit here.
Transactions
NJD
  1. Abruzzese, Nick [Liste de réserve]
  2. Amirov, Rodion [Liste de réserve]
  3. Hirvonen, Roni [Liste de réserve]
  4. Koster, Mike [Liste de réserve]
  5. Liljegren, Timothy
  6. Niemelä, Topi [Liste de réserve]
  7. Robertson, Nicholas
  8. Villeneuve, William [Liste de réserve]
Détails additionnels:
Some combination of these guys for...
(who would Leafs send?)
TOR
  1. Dell, Aaron
  2. Gusev, Nikita (2 250 000 $ retained)
  3. Kulikov, Dmitry
  4. Murray, Ryan (2 300 000 $ retained)
  5. Palmieri, Kyle (2 325 000 $ retained)
  6. Vatanen, Sami
  7. Wood, Miles
  8. Zajac, Travis
Détails additionnels:
Some combination of these guys
(Who do Leafs need?)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de NJD
Logo de NYI
Logo de NJD
Logo de ARI
Logo de NJD
Logo de BUF
Logo de NJD
Logo de ARI
2022
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de CBJ
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2023
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1781 500 000 $54 793 553 $0 $4 447 500 $26 706 447 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
874 125 $874 125 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
811 666 $811 666 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 822 764 $2 822 764 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
714 166 $714 166 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
912 500 $912 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance25 000 $$25K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
809 167 $809 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
775 833 $775 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 avr. 2021 à 8 h 12
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,015
Mentions "j'aime": 434
To me the only ones that shouldn't be considered in a move are Robertson niemela and hirvonen as for what they might want out of those devil players it's really only palms
1 avr. 2021 à 8 h 42
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: TheOtherAuston
To me the only ones that shouldn't be considered in a move are Robertson niemela and hirvonen as for what they might want out of those devil players it's really only palms


And Liljegren, he's better than Niemela. I wouldn't trade Robertson or Liljegren and the rest are options in the right trade.
1 avr. 2021 à 8 h 50
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,015
Mentions "j'aime": 434
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
And Liljegren, he's better than Niemela. I wouldn't trade Robertson or Liljegren and the rest are options in the right trade.


Difference of opinion but I understand it. But the only absolute untouchables would be Robertson and Sandin. The rest could be had if it was a deal that couldn't be refused
1 avr. 2021 à 9 h 6
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,691
Mentions "j'aime": 1,932
Just checking, Lilj Sandin and Robertson are off limits for Palms?
1 avr. 2021 à 9 h 12
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: TheOtherAuston
Difference of opinion but I understand it. But the only absolute untouchables would be Robertson and Sandin. The rest could be had if it was a deal that couldn't be refused


I just don't think trading an NHL ready RHD is wise
1 avr. 2021 à 10 h 21
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,015
Mentions "j'aime": 434
Quoting: Smitty426
Just checking, Lilj Sandin and Robertson are off limits for Palms?


I'm not opposed to lilj, but the other two are 100% not worth moving for a rental. Lilj and a third for retention would be what I would look at.. or something alone those lines engvall would have to be included for cap purposes
1 avr. 2021 à 11 h 17
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,691
Mentions "j'aime": 1,932
Quoting: TheOtherAuston
I'm not opposed to lilj, but the other two are 100% not worth moving for a rental. Lilj and a third for retention would be what I would look at.. or something alone those lines engvall would have to be included for cap purposes


I would think Leafs woudl make almost any leap that would put them any closer to the promised land. I am not downplaying your prospects but isn't this "the year"? Its not like the ask is Palms for Marner/Matthews/Nylander. Just a thought. Its kinda tough to ask for what could be the final piece to be retained, take back a contract, offer a player drafter 4 yrs ago and is just starting to play and a third which has little to no chance of ever playing at the pro level. I think Palms goes to Bos or hopefully Long Island, and it wont make a difference.
1 avr. 2021 à 21 h 24
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,015
Mentions "j'aime": 434
Quoting: Smitty426
I would think Leafs woudl make almost any leap that would put them any closer to the promised land. I am not downplaying your prospects but isn't this "the year"? Its not like the ask is Palms for Marner/Matthews/Nylander. Just a thought. Its kinda tough to ask for what could be the final piece to be retained, take back a contract, offer a player drafter 4 yrs ago and is just starting to play and a third which has little to no chance of ever playing at the pro level. I think Palms goes to Bos or hopefully Long Island, and it wont make a difference.


It is "the year" but that doesn't mean we lose sense of worth. Liljegren is a good prospect who is NHL and will likely be a really good number 4 d man and possibly a number three with more ice time. I never said palms was "the piece" I don't mind him but he's further down my list. We can't compromise our future just to say the hell with it on maybe
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage