Roster Architect
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
This entire deal makes no sense.
You say moving Sutter at 50% retained is equal to a 4th round pick (basically a cap dump), but then the price to move Turris who's deal is less at $1.65M but just has an extra year of control costs a good prospect? Both contracts have roughly the same amount of real money left on them so there's no economically value to either side either. You could make a good argument that Sutter retained at 50% straight up for Turris is equal value as it is. Sutter being the slightly better player, but Turris having more team control. But the difference is far from a prospect like McLeod.