SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline Theory 20 - Roast Me

Créé par: doublem24
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 29 mars 2021
Publié: 29 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Updated post from last week:

I increased the return on Pettersson and increased the package and return from Detriot.

Thoughts?
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
2.
DET
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2681 500 000 $78 881 667 $0 $850 000 $2 618 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 mars 2021 à 15 h 10
#1
Pens are the best
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 5,390
Mentions "j'aime": 1,691
Pettersson gets more
29 mars 2021 à 15 h 10
#2
NoWah49
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,863
Mentions "j'aime": 1,432
these aren't big enough moves to roast
doublem24 a aimé ceci.
29 mars 2021 à 15 h 12
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 380
Mentions "j'aime": 192
II think it's pretty rational, pitt might have to add in a 4th to wings side, but otherwise it's not roastable
doublem24 a aimé ceci.
29 mars 2021 à 15 h 14
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,449
Mentions "j'aime": 6,101
LA isn't a good fit for Pettersson. LA is looking for someone with a higher ceiling. They already have guys that can play in their 2nd and 3rd pairings. They need a bonafide #2 guy to play on the top pair.
OldNYIfan et doublem24 a aimé ceci.
29 mars 2021 à 15 h 28
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 2,145
Mentions "j'aime": 367
This is essentially the Pens plan. Move MP for assets and use some of those assets to improve forwards. I just hope it isn`t Glendening. I would much rather prefer someone like Getzlaf. I also would hope they can swing a deal for another LD.

My last ACGM I had MP to Van for a third and Jordie Benn.

2020 2nd and Riikola for Getzlaf half retained and Nic Deslauriers

Also, McCann should stay with Malkin and Zucker should have his own line. Zucker and Malkin had absolutely zero chemistry.
29 mars 2021 à 15 h 29
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 2,145
Mentions "j'aime": 367
Quoting: Imagine875948
Pettersson gets more


Not so sure about that at this point
doublem24 a aimé ceci.
29 mars 2021 à 15 h 40
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 1,739
Mentions "j'aime": 971
Wings pass, they'll get a better asset than two late 3rd's for a Ryan and Glendening package
doublem24 a aimé ceci.
29 mars 2021 à 16 h 13
#8
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,664
Mentions "j'aime": 24,580
We said No to Pettersson last time when the price was lower, purely on the basis of fit plus the fact that we'd have to expose him or Kale Clague (or both, now that we've acquired Brendan Lemieux) in the expansion draft. Why would we say Yes when the price is raised?
doublem24 a aimé ceci.
29 mars 2021 à 16 h 18
#9
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: OldNYIfan
We said No to Pettersson last time when the price was lower, purely on the basis of fit plus the fact that we'd have to expose him or Kale Clague (or both, now that we've acquired Brendan Lemieux) in the expansion draft. Why would we say Yes when the price is raised?


Brendan Lemieux is not worth protecting in the expansion draft.
29 mars 2021 à 17 h 3
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: ChampEddy
Not so sure about that at this point


Then there is no point in trading him.
29 mars 2021 à 17 h 5
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
These are terrible and you should be ashamed of yourself lol.
But honestly, could get more for MP. Don’t think they move him until after the expansion draft. Defensive depth (especially a top 4 one) is more important than 4th liners.
doublem24 a aimé ceci.
30 mars 2021 à 10 h 14
#12
Démarrer sujet
DoubleM24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 138
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Quoting: OldNYIfan
We said No to Pettersson last time when the price was lower, purely on the basis of fit plus the fact that we'd have to expose him or Kale Clague (or both, now that we've acquired Brendan Lemieux) in the expansion draft. Why would we say Yes when the price is raised?


I agree that the fit isn't there; I'm just using LA as example of what Pitt may get in return if they move him. The original price of a 3rd and a 4th seems more realistic to me, but at that point keeping him might be the better option. Ultimately, the goal is to get his salary off the books for next year, potentially add a piece for this year or hold a medium/low value future asset (Mid Round pick).

It seems like a pretty tall task to move him given his performance over the last 2 season. His AAV and term are right in the middle of being overpaid or perfectly paid.

All that to say, it doesn't seem like he really moves the needle, which may make this whole thing invalid.

Burke and Hextall have both made comments that they are looking to add but I wonder if Pitts recent performance is lowering the need. They may be finding solutions for the bottom 6 by giving a few of their AHL guys a chance due to the injuries they've sustained.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
30 mars 2021 à 10 h 16
#13
Démarrer sujet
DoubleM24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 138
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Quoting: NoWah49
these aren't big enough moves to roast


Quoting: fedorov91
II think it's pretty rational, pitt might have to add in a 4th to wings side, but otherwise it's not roastable


Just trying to get peeps to look at the post tears of joy
fedorov91, OldNYIfan et NoWah49 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage