SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Idea of the day

Créé par: SomeonesOffended
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 22 mars 2021
Publié: 22 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
TOR
  1. Iafallo, Alex
  2. Quick, Jonathan (2 900 000 $ retained)
LAK
  1. Andersen, Frederik
  2. Sandin, Rasmus
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $77 874 741 $0 $0 $3 625 259 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
874 125 $874 125 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
0 $0 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 mars 2021 à 20 h 34
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,676
Mentions "j'aime": 23,815
I wouldn’t include Sandin tbh
onion, aadoyle et MitchMarner_16 a aimé ceci.
22 mars 2021 à 20 h 37
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
This is a joke right?

Jonathan Quick is probably the worst goalie in the NHL at this point I'm his career.

Edited to correct: he's playing a little better than I thought so we'll change it to one of the worst.

Dudes done though. And that's nothing to be ashamed of. He was a rock for a few years and instrumental on two cups. He's just at the end of his career
onion a aimé ceci.
22 mars 2021 à 20 h 39
#3
torontos finest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,560
Mentions "j'aime": 11,191
Quoting: BCAPP
This is a joke right?

Jonathan Quick is probably the worst goalie in the NHL at this point I'm his career.


He's far from the worst goalie in the league, but I don't think he'd be a huge help to Toronto going forward.
aadoyle et MitchMarner_16 a aimé ceci.
22 mars 2021 à 20 h 42
#4
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,720
Mentions "j'aime": 20,881
Quoting: csick
I wouldn’t include Sandin tbh


A18D69CD6BB963F692B68C2F03EB67765EE075E6

this guy gets it
csick a aimé ceci.
22 mars 2021 à 20 h 48
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: mondo
He's far from the worst goalie in the league, but I don't think he'd be a huge help to Toronto going forward.


I corrected myself but I wouldn't say far from the worst.

I should have said worst starter or near starter.

Over the last three seasons there have been 33 goalies who have over 85 games played. Quick and Jones are tied for last in save percentage with an 0.896. That's awful.

http://www.nhl.com/stats/goalies?reportType=season&seasonFrom=20182019&seasonTo=20202021&gameType=2&filter=gamesPlayed,gte,1&filter=gamesPlayed,gte,85&sort=savePct&page=0&pageSize=50
22 mars 2021 à 20 h 50
#6
Démarrer sujet
FKA Bigtittielarper
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 7,728
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
Quoting: BCAPP
I corrected myself but I wouldn't say far from the worst.

I should have said worst starter or near starter.

Over the last three seasons there have been 33 goalies who have over 85 games played. Quick and Jones are tied for last in save percentage with an 0.896. That's awful.

http://www.nhl.com/stats/goalies?reportType=season&seasonFrom=20182019&seasonTo=20202021&gameType=2&filter=gamesPlayed,gte,1&filter=gamesPlayed,gte,85&sort=savePct&page=0&pageSize=50


Can’t discount being on terrible teams that year
22 mars 2021 à 20 h 57
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: csick
I wouldn’t include Sandin tbh


there is no way LA is giving them Iafallo for a 2nd though.
22 mars 2021 à 20 h 58
#8
torontos finest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,560
Mentions "j'aime": 11,191
Quoting: SomeonesOffended
Can’t discount being on terrible teams that year


Is GSAA between 2017 - 2020 is -16.10.

https://www.naturalstattrick.com/playerteams.php?fromseason=20172018&thruseason=20192020&stype=2&sit=5v5&score=all&stdoi=g&rate=n&team=ALL&pos=S&loc=B&toi=0&gpfilt=none&fd=&td=&tgp=410&lines=single&draftteam=ALL
BCAPP a aimé ceci.
22 mars 2021 à 20 h 59
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,433
Mentions "j'aime": 22,637
Quick is no better than Freddie. And I certainly wouldn't trade Sandin for a UFA, who isn't a big upgrade on what we have now....And then both players are three weeks away from seeing NHL ice once the trade is made.
Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 6
#10
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,676
Mentions "j'aime": 23,815
Quoting: pharrow
there is no way LA is giving them Iafallo for a 2nd though.


They have to add but not Sandin
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 14
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: pharrow
there is no way LA is giving them Iafallo for a 2nd though.


Taking on quick for three years is worth a first alone.

I would not take iaffallo and quick 50% retained without a first coming along. Quick is bad
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 14
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: SomeonesOffended
Can’t discount being on terrible teams that year


Eh, it doesn't excuse him simply being bad. Quick is riding his reputation from early career success. He's awful at this point
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 15
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: palhal
Quick is no better than Freddie. And I certainly wouldn't trade Sandin for a UFA, who isn't a big upgrade on what we have now....And then both players are three weeks away from seeing NHL ice once the trade is made.


Quick is much worse
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 16
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: csick
They have to add but not Sandin


If quick is included being stuck with him for 3 years at nearly 3 million then Iafallo is not enough to take him. He's terrible at this point. People can't see that as he was an excellent goal tender for about a decade prior but he hit a wall three years ago
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 20
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 401
Mentions "j'aime": 74
Quoting: BCAPP
If quick is included being stuck with him for 3 years at nearly 3 million then Iafallo is not enough to take him. He's terrible at this point. People can't see that as he was an excellent goal tender for about a decade prior but he hit a wall three years ago


Don't have to be stuck with him....you send Seatle a 3rd round pick to take Quick next year...if he is retained @ 50% that gives them a vet goalie backup at a reasonable price for 2 years and we can protect Campbell for draft expansion
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 26
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: Loxley_1972
Don't have to be stuck with him....you send Seatle a 3rd round pick to take Quick next year...if he is retained 50% that gives them a vet goalie backup at a reasonable price for 2 years and we can protect Campbell for draft expansion


Why would they or anyone else want him?

He isn't a "vet goalie" that you want to back up. He sucks. He provides no positive value and just makes his team worse.
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 28
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: BCAPP
Taking on quick for three years is worth a first alone.

I would not take iaffallo and quick 50% retained without a first coming along. Quick is bad


they just buy quick out, it's really no that much of an issue, he LTIRs.
TOR has deep pockets so no big deal.
It's a moot point.
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 29
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: pharrow
they just buy quick out, it's really no that much of an issue, he LTIRs.
TOR has deep pockets so no big deal.
It's a moot point.


Buying him out leave him stuck on our cap. Why would we want that cap hit? And why would he agree to go on ltir if he wants to stay?

Would you say the same thing about the Lucic contract or the erricson contract?

The quick contract is awful and has a very large negative value.
palhal a aimé ceci.
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 34
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: BCAPP
Buying him out leave him stuck on our cap. Why would we want that cap hit? And why would he agree to go on ltir if he wants to stay?

Would you say the same thing about the Lucic contract or the erricson contract?

The quick contract is awful and has a very large negative value.


LTIR doesn't give you a cap hit.
It's a lot easier to justify a Bishop LTIR retiring than a Lucic one. Lucic is only 32 this year. Quick is 35.
That's a pretty huge difference.
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 36
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: pharrow
LTIR doesn't give you a cap hit.
It's a lot easier to justify a Bishop LTIR retiring than a Lucic one. Lucic is only 32 this year. Quick is 35.
That's a pretty huge difference.


The player has to agree to it... If quick was willing to do that, la would just do that and not bother to trade him. There is no reason for Toronto to get in the middle of this.
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 39
#21
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: BCAPP
The player has to agree to it... If quick was willing to do that, la would just do that and not bother to trade him. There is no reason for Toronto to get in the middle of this.


TOR has deeper pockets. I wouldn't put it past quick to agree. He has no clauses. You put him on waivers, then down to the AHL. He'll retire ltir.
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 41
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,381
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: pharrow
TOR has deeper pockets. I wouldn't put it past quick to agree. He has no clauses. You put him on waivers, then down to the AHL. He'll retire ltir.


If for whatever reason Toronto agreed to this (and btw ltir is not as clean as you think, it only comes into play whenat the cap ceiling, so it stops the team from being able to build cap room later in the season to acquire free agents) the leafs would expect to be paid to do so.

And again as the cost would be cap space (either in the general sense if he plays or being forced into the ltir window where they can't bank cap space to acquire players at the tdl), the leafs would have no interest.
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 49
#23
DanyHeatley4allstar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 299
Mentions "j'aime": 51
I would't give up Sandin for that. Liljegren and maybe a second to get retention on Iaffalo. Then you could snag Eric Staal and Brandon Montour from BUF and find a way to get rid of Kerfoot's contract. Leafs need to go all in not just half in and I don't see this roster quite capable enough yet. 3C needs improvement.
22 mars 2021 à 21 h 51
#24
DanyHeatley4allstar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 299
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Quoting: BCAPP
Buying him out leave him stuck on our cap. Why would we want that cap hit? And why would he agree to go on ltir if he wants to stay?

Would you say the same thing about the Lucic contract or the erricson contract?

The quick contract is awful and has a very large negative value.


Gibson or Kuemper would be MUCH better even if the Leafs give up more to get them. Freddie is inconsistent but when he is on his game he is a better goalie than Quick
22 mars 2021 à 22 h 58
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 401
Mentions "j'aime": 74
Quoting: BCAPP
Why would they or anyone else want him?

He isn't a "vet goalie" that you want to back up. He sucks. He provides no positive value and just makes his team worse.


Because apparently he and Campbell have a great friendship off the ice.....as for why anyone else would want him they'd do it for a pick or prospect
BCAPP a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage