Good offence from d doesn't necessarily translate to good offence at forward

What do people think Ekholm is going to do at D that Muzzin isn’t? Just curious.

Ekholm would be a luxury. There is one weak link on the left side of the defence, third pairing. Ekholm would be a massive improvement and allow Keefe to time-manage the D core efficiently.

I love the idea in theory but I don't see Dubas going for that. Plus the cap issues.

nothing, which is the point. Why have 1 Muzzin when you can have 2

Preds and Yotes accept

I wouldn’t if I’m the preds.

Maybe not Jarnkrok for Kerfoot.

But certainly Ekholm for Hallander, Hirvonen and the 1st round pick.

David Poile wants a return that the Kings got for Muzzin in any Ekholm trade and this gets it done if you take out the Jarnkrok-Kerfoot swap.