SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Granland Ekholm How Far Off

Créé par: KANYE_IS_KING
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 18 mars 2021
Publié: 18 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
TOR
  1. Ekholm, Mattias
  2. Granlund, Mikael (1 875 000 $ retained)
NSH
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
  3. Liljegren, Timothy
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $81 397 283 $0 $0 $102 717 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 mars 2021 à 14 h 20
#26
The 1 True GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,128
Mentions "j'aime": 160
Quoting: justaBoss
Value is there, but the pieces offered here are simply something NSH don't really need.

You can get Ekholm for Liljegren+Hirvonen+1st

You can get Granlund for two 2nds.

NSH have virtually no use for Kerfoot or Dermott.


Salary in salary out... any deal Nashville makes with any buyer is going to involve a contract coming back.
19 mars 2021 à 15 h 4
#27
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: Sean4417
Salary in salary out... any deal Nashville makes with any buyer is going to involve a contract coming back.


Not necessarily. Nothing forces them to add in contracts. If they need cap space they might have to pull a Kekäläinen and move some of their contracts for low picks...like he did with Murray for instance.
19 mars 2021 à 15 h 13
#28
The 1 True GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,128
Mentions "j'aime": 160
Quoting: justaBoss
Not necessarily. Nothing forces them to add in contracts. If they need cap space they might have to pull a Kekäläinen and move some of their contracts for low picks...like he did with Murray for instance.


Only way a contract doesnt go back to Nashville is the buyer has a separate deal in place to move dollars out. If thats the case then the price tag just went down quite a bit. But if its the right deal and the right prospects Nashille (or any seller) is getting then theyll take a contract for various reasons... they need to fill roster spots with NHL capable guys, they need to hit the cap basement, they still want to appear to be competetive. And right now if Nashville is in full sell mode and ready to trade Forsberg, Ekholm, Granlund, etc those guys carry a big cap hits.. so obviously definately theyll be taking back contracts to be over that basement
19 mars 2021 à 15 h 20
#29
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: Sean4417
Only way a contract doesnt go back to Nashville is the buyer has a separate deal in place to move dollars out. If thats the case then the price tag just went down quite a bit. But if its the right deal and the right prospects Nashille (or any seller) is getting then theyll take a contract for various reasons... they need to fill roster spots with NHL capable guys, they need to hit the cap basement, they still want to appear to be competetive. And right now if Nashville is in full sell mode and ready to trade Forsberg, Ekholm, Granlund, etc those guys carry a big cap hits.. so obviously definately theyll be taking back contracts to be over that basement


Well Forsberg isn't going. In the current situation I can't see them getting the return they'd be after.

As for Ekholm or Granlund, no one forces them to deal these players to teams who can't afford. For instance, WPG or BOS could afford taking Ekholm's full contract right away without moving a contract back. Granny half-retained is also quite cheap...can think of 15 teams who could take this contract in.

Main point - preds don't need to worry about taking contracts in if they don't want to. Then again, if the contract is useful, then sure why not take one in...
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage