Forums/Armchair-GM

Cup winning leafs

Créé par: DubasJr
Date de création initiale: 16 mars 2021
Publié: 16 mars 2021
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Ekholm, Mattias (1 875 000 $ retained)
  2. Forsberg, Filip (2 500 000 $ retained)
NSH
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Engvall, Pierre
  3. Der-Arguchintsev, Semyon
  4. Liljegren, Timothy
  5. 2021 1e round pick (TOR)
  6. 2022 2e round pick (TOR)
  7. 2022 3e round pick (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
2nd in 2022 becomes 1st in 2022 if Leafs advance to at least the Conference finals and resign one or both of Ekholm/Forsberg
2.
TOR
    NSH
    1. Dermott, Travis
    Détails additionnels:
    Forgot to include Dermot in the deal
    Rachats de contrats
    • Mikhail Grabovski: 0 $
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    • Phil Kessel: 1 200 000 $ (15%)
    ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
    2021
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2022
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2181 500 000 $81 475 616 $0 $0 $24 384 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de TOR
    Hyman, Zach
    2 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Matthews, Auston
    11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 4
    Logo de TOR
    Marner, Mitchell
    10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de NSH
    Forsberg, Filip
    3 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de TOR
    Tavares, John
    11 000 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de TOR
    Nylander, William
    6 962 366 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de TOR
    Mikheyev, Ilya
    1 645 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de TOR
    Thornton, Joe
    700 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Simmonds, Wayne
    1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Vesey, Jimmy
    900 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Spezza, Jason
    700 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Boyd, Travis
    700 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de TOR
    Rielly, Morgan
    5 000 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de TOR
    Brodie, TJ
    5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de TOR
    Andersen, Frederik
    5 000 000 $
    G
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Muzzin, Jake
    5 625 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de TOR
    Holl, Justin
    2 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de TOR
    Campbell, Jack
    1 650 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de NSH
    Ekholm, Mattias
    1 875 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de TOR
    Bogosian, Zach
    1 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Hutchinson, Michael
    725 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de TOR
    Robertson, Nicholas
    821 667 $ (0 $)
    AG
    RFA - 4
    Logo de TOR
    Galchenyuk, Alex
    1 050 000 $ (0 $)
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Agostino, Kenny
    737 500 $ (0 $)
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Marincin, Martin
    700 000 $ (0 $)
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    16 mars 2021 à 21 h 38
    #1
    Smashville13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 108
    Mentions "j'aime": 88
    Nashville declines
    tomato43 a aimé ceci.
    16 mars 2021 à 21 h 48
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 150
    Mentions "j'aime": 24
    Quoting: jl639s
    Nashville declines


    Why would they decline?
    16 mars 2021 à 21 h 49
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 150
    Mentions "j'aime": 24
    Quoting: jl639s
    Nashville declines


    Ekholm for Kerfoot (middle 6 forward), SDA (B level prospect), Conditional 2nd (A to B level Prospect) and 3rd (B to C level prospect)

    Forsberg for Engvall (bottom 6 forward), Liljegren (A level Prospect), 1st rounder (A to B level Prospect)

    Nashville could have a bounce back year next year if they were to keep these guys but I don't think that it is unfair trade value.
    16 mars 2021 à 21 h 52
    #4
    tomato
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2018
    Messages: 473
    Mentions "j'aime": 277
    I dont get the point of going out and trading for ekholm only for him to play 3rd pair minutes. And i dont see the point of playing him more and having either of Reilly or Muzzin playing third pair minutes.
    If we trade for a forward who has years left on his current deal beyond this season we open ourselves to losing Holl to Seattle. I would much rather target a rental player and go 4-4-1 and expose Kerfoot and Dermott while protecting all of our current top 4.

    Trading Dermott, Liljegren and losing Holl in the expansion leaves this team with a deficient on defense once again especially on the right side, like the last handful of years.

    I also think Nashville could get more if they sold these players separately. They are Both top tier trade options for contendors.
    jl639s et DubasJr a aimé ceci.
    16 mars 2021 à 21 h 53
    #5
    Smashville13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 108
    Mentions "j'aime": 88
    Quoting: DubasJr
    Ekholm for Kerfoot (middle 6 forward), SDA (B level prospect), Conditional 2nd (A to B level Prospect) and 3rd (B to C level prospect)

    Forsberg for Engvall (bottom 6 forward), Liljegren (A level Prospect), 1st rounder (A to B level Prospect)

    Nashville could have a bounce back year next year if they were to keep these guys but I don't think that it is unfair trade value.


    Nashville has no interest in Engvall or Kerfoot. They would only be coming back to balance money. Preds have an abundance of middle to lower 6 forwards. They are looking for futures only. Both trades are on the low end for Nashville and that’s assuming no salary is retained. With $4mil in salary retained, the offers are ridiculously low.
    tomato43 a aimé ceci.
    16 mars 2021 à 21 h 58
    #6
    tomato
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2018
    Messages: 473
    Mentions "j'aime": 277
    Quoting: DubasJr
    Ekholm for Kerfoot (middle 6 forward), SDA (B level prospect), Conditional 2nd (A to B level Prospect) and 3rd (B to C level prospect)

    Forsberg for Engvall (bottom 6 forward), Liljegren (A level Prospect), 1st rounder (A to B level Prospect)

    Nashville could have a bounce back year next year if they were to keep these guys but I don't think that it is unfair trade value.


    Kerfoot and Engvall dont hold much value. SDA is a nice shot in the dark but probably wont be an NHL player. Liljegren is nice and the picks are nice, but both Forsberg and Ekholm have another year on the deal and are top tier players. The asking price for them should be huge even before retained salary.
    16 mars 2021 à 22 h 1
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 150
    Mentions "j'aime": 24
    Quoting: tomato43
    I dont get the point of going out and trading for ekholm only for him to play 3rd pair minutes. And i dont see the point of playing him more and having either of Reilly or Muzzin playing third pair minutes.
    If we trade for a forward who has years left on his current deal beyond this season we open ourselves to losing Holl to Seattle. I would much rather target a rental player and go 4-4-1 and expose Kerfoot and Dermott while protecting all of our current top 4.

    Trading Dermott, Liljegren and losing Holl in the expansion leaves this team with a deficient on defense once again especially on the right side, like the last handful of years.

    I also think Nashville could get more if they sold these players separately. They are Both top tier trade options for contendors.


    The reason I would make this trade is to get a top 4 D (Ekholm) on a cheap deal for next season which allows you to resign Hyman for sure and maybe even Anderson. You let Seattle take Muzzin or Brodie in expansion. Top 4 next season is: Rielly, Ekholm, Holl,, Muzzin or Brodie with Sandin and a bogo like Dman on your 3rd pair. This also solidifies the top 6 for next year with Forsberg, matthews, marner, hyman, tavares, nylander. I see why parting ways with liljegren/dermot could hurt the team on the right side but it's also about cap flexibility next season and the season after when Rielly is a UFA. If this were to happen i don't think there would be a better top 6/top 4 in the league for this season and the next.
    16 mars 2021 à 22 h 7
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 150
    Mentions "j'aime": 24
    Quoting: tomato43
    Kerfoot and Engvall dont hold much value. SDA is a nice shot in the dark but probably wont be an NHL player. Liljegren is nice and the picks are nice, but both Forsberg and Ekholm have another year on the deal and are top tier players. The asking price for them should be huge even before retained salary.


    But considering it's known that Nashville wants a similar package to what the leafs gave up for Muzzin wouldn't SDA, a conditional 2nd, a 3rd suffice. probably upgrade SDA to Hallander as he is more of a solidified prospect but I do not think it is to far off. plus you are adding a 2nd line winger or 3rd line centre in kerfoot which was not included in the Muzzin trade.
    16 mars 2021 à 22 h 9
    #9
    tomato
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2018
    Messages: 473
    Mentions "j'aime": 277
    Quoting: DubasJr
    The reason I would make this trade is to get a top 4 D (Ekholm) on a cheap deal for next season which allows you to resign Hyman for sure and maybe even Anderson. You let Seattle take Muzzin or Brodie in expansion. Top 4 next season is: Rielly, Ekholm, Holl,, Muzzin or Brodie with Sandin and a bogo like Dman on your 3rd pair. This also solidifies the top 6 for next year with Forsberg, matthews, marner, hyman, tavares, nylander. I see why parting ways with liljegren/dermot could hurt the team on the right side but it's also about cap flexibility next season and the season after when Rielly is a UFA. If this were to happen i don't think there would be a better top 6/top 4 in the league for this season and the next.


    If either of Muzzin or Brodie was playing poorly i would be all on board galaxy braining going after Ekholm and exposing one of them. They are both playing well though. This is not a way to get UFAs to come to the leafs. Dubas goes out of his way to make right by the players in situations such as Leivo and Lehtonen. Exposing two recently signed UFAs after they play well and then almost immediately backdoor them to another team is a good way to not have UFAs want to sign here.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Supprimer une option
    Soumettre le sondage