SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A Fair Rakell offer

Créé par: Leafsforver67
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 16 mars 2021
Publié: 16 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $79 437 880 $0 $0 $2 062 120 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
874 125 $874 125 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
737 500 $737 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 mars 2021 à 3 h 46
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
I get this is satire, but yeah it's too much.

In terms of considering the needs of ANA, maybe drop Kerfoot and first. Engvall+Robertson for Rakell is a bargain for them, all things considered.
16 mars 2021 à 5 h 30
#2
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,133
Mentions "j'aime": 11,291
Quoting: justaBoss
I get this is satire, but yeah it's too much.

In terms of considering the needs of ANA, maybe drop Kerfoot and first. Engvall+Robertson for Rakell is a bargain for them, all things considered.



Yeah, it's too much. The thing is, without Kerfoot included, the Leafs don;t have the cap to make the deal.
16 mars 2021 à 5 h 31
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: mokumboi
Yeah, it's too much. The thing is, without Kerfoot included, the Leafs don;t have the cap to make the deal.


Half retain the guy and he costs like 500k more than Engvall.
16 mars 2021 à 6 h 38
#4
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: justaBoss
I get this is satire, but yeah it's too much.

In terms of considering the needs of ANA, maybe drop Kerfoot and first. Engvall+Robertson for Rakell is a bargain for them, all things considered.


I don't know...I don't really think the Ducks need Kerfoot. If the Leafs need retention, and Engvall is the filler, I'd do Rakell for Robertson and a 2nd (and Engvall). If there's no retention, sure, Engvall and Robertson.
16 mars 2021 à 6 h 40
#5
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Lenny7
I don't know...I don't really think the Ducks need Kerfoot. If the Leafs need retention, and Engvall is the filler, I'd do Rakell for Robertson and a 2nd (and Engvall). If there's no retention, sure, Engvall and Robertson.


Exactly, hence I said drop Kerfoot.

Imo Rakell half retained for Engvall+Robertson+2nd is bit too much. Robertson is high caliber prospect enough...don't think a pick is necessary. Maybe a 3rd.
16 mars 2021 à 6 h 42
#6
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: justaBoss
Exactly, hence I said drop Kerfoot.

Imo Rakell half retained for Engvall+Robertson+2nd is bit too much. Robertson is high caliber prospect enough...don't think a pick is necessary. Maybe a 3rd.


I'm just not 100% sold on him yet, but I guess that's on me...Lots of little guys have had offensive success in the CHL, and AHL for that matter, and it hasn't translated to the NHL. That's what I worry about.
16 mars 2021 à 6 h 56
#7
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Lenny7
I'm just not 100% sold on him yet, but I guess that's on me...Lots of little guys have had offensive success in the CHL, and AHL for that matter, and it hasn't translated to the NHL. That's what I worry about.


Perhaps, but it's always lottery with prospects. His background is still comparably very promising.

There's a possibility Comtois-Zegras-Robertson line could become the next Marchand-Bergeron-Pastrnak line in the next 5 years or so.
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 7 h 2
#8
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: justaBoss
Perhaps, but it's always lottery with prospects. His background is still comparably very promising.

There's a possibility Comtois-Zegras-Robertson line could become the next Marchand-Bergeron-Pastrnak line in the next 5 years or so.


I know. I just worry about GMBM blowing another move, and turning around to trade Rakell for some bum like Virtanen tears of joy This would also ruin my recurring dream of reuniting everyone's favorite Jr. hockey bromance, Zegras/Caufield (Which will never happen, but I'd burn cities to reunite them).
16 mars 2021 à 7 h 5
#9
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Lenny7
I know. I just worry about GMBM blowing another move, and turning around to trade Rakell for some bum like Virtanen tears of joy This would also ruin my recurring dream of reuniting everyone's favorite Jr. hockey bromance, Zegras/Caufield (Which will never happen, but I'd burn cities to reunite them).


tears of joy unfortunately Habs suck too much right now.

If there's one duo I'd like to unite it's MacKinnon-Drouin. They were insanely good back in QMJHL.
16 mars 2021 à 7 h 26
#10
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: justaBoss
tears of joy unfortunately Habs suck too much right now.

If there's one duo I'd like to unite it's MacKinnon-Drouin. They were insanely good back in QMJHL.


Fair, but you'd be breaking up one of the top 2 or 3 lines in hockey tears of joy

I'm curious as to how badly a Landy-Mac-Rantanen line would have done had they all been in Jr. at the same time.
16 mars 2021 à 8 h 5
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,460
Mentions "j'aime": 22,651
The biggest overpay for Rakell posted. Yea you might not like Kerfoot and his 13 points this season, but geez how much better is Rakell and his 19 points
mokumboi a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 8 h 29
#12
Leafhater
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 27
I don’t think it’s much of an overpayment at all. As usual, just a bunch of Leaf fans thinking they can get good players for their crap.

It’s a late 1st rd pick, a salary dump of a mediocre player who got paid to much, an ok prospect who the odds are against ever sticking in the NHL, and a bottom 6 C. Looks like Toronto is winning this trade because they’re getting the best player.
Ducksfan93 a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2021 à 8 h 31
#13
Leafhater
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: palhal
The biggest overpay for Rakell posted. Yea you might not like Kerfoot and his 13 points this season, but geez how much better is Rakell and his 19 points


50% better...huge difference.
50 pt guy vs 30 pt guy.
16 mars 2021 à 13 h 56
#14
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,460
Mentions "j'aime": 22,651
Quoting: quinnjj
50% better...huge difference.
50 pt guy vs 30 pt guy.


Well 30 games played this season, Rakell sits for about 10 games, as he has to quarantine for 14 days before can even practice. So he plays about 18 games before the playoffs.
16 mars 2021 à 14 h 35
#15
Leafhater
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: palhal
Well 30 games played this season, Rakell sits for about 10 games, as he has to quarantine for 14 days before can even practice. So he plays about 18 games before the playoffs.


To bad...not Anaheim’s problem or 23 other teams.
16 mars 2021 à 15 h 7
#16
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,460
Mentions "j'aime": 22,651
Quoting: quinnjj
To bad...not Anaheim’s problem or 23 other teams.


Well see what you can get for him even if he's traded. No wa it's even close to what this post indicated.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage