SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline moves

Créé par: HKY101
Équipe: 2020-21 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 11 mars 2021
Publié: 11 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
NJD
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (COL)
2.
COL
  1. Grant, Derek
  2. Rakell, Rickard
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Compher, J.T.
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (COL)
3.
COL
  1. Borowiecki, Mark
  2. Granlund, Mikael
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (NSH)
NSH
  1. Graves, Ryan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (COL)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de NSH
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2023
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $77 442 026 $0 $5 000 000 $4 057 974 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
874 125 $874 125 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
725 000 $725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (1 175 000 $$1M1 175 000 $$1M)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 mars 2021 à 9 h 24
#1
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
With the report that Anaheim's asking price for Rakell is "Very high", this ain't it.
11 mars 2021 à 10 h 0
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 473
Mentions "j'aime": 257
As a Preds fan, I say YES for Graves!
11 mars 2021 à 10 h 1
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Lenny7
With the report that Anaheim's asking price for Rakell is "Very high", this ain't it.


i dont think that gets it done either but just bc the Ask is high doesnt mean the market will be high returns, teams can ask for all they want, it will be how motivated the ducks are selling and what teams are willing to give up now that its all but confirmed a flat cap for up to 4 years.

End of the day he should still get a 1st, a good prospect, and a young nhl player with some upside.
Lenny7 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
11 mars 2021 à 10 h 3
#4
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: coga16
i dont think that gets it done either but just bc the Ask is high doesnt mean the market will be high returns, teams can ask for all they want, it will be how motivated the ducks are selling and what teams are willing to give up now that its all but confirmed a flat cap for up to 4 years.

End of the day he should still get a 1st, a good prospect, and a young nhl player with some upside.


Yeah, that's about what I was thinking. I also don't think there's any reason to rush to trade him. I'd personally prefer to move Silfverberg if possible.
11 mars 2021 à 10 h 7
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Lenny7
Yeah, that's about what I was thinking. I also don't think there's any reason to rush to trade him. I'd personally prefer to move Silfverberg if possible.


I think moving Silfverberg would be tough, him and Henrique have the same contracts and just looking looks like they have the same offensive numbers now this season.
Maybe in the offseason when teams can start moving money around a bit more in hockey trades.

Rackell is really your prized trade asset with that contact, teams will probably will pony up a nice return once everything is settled. Avs would probably be a 1st, Helleson, and Jost
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
11 mars 2021 à 10 h 17
#6
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: coga16
I think moving Silfverberg would be tough, him and Henrique have the same contracts and just looking looks like they have the same offensive numbers now this season.
Maybe in the offseason when teams can start moving money around a bit more in hockey trades.

Rackell is really your prized trade asset with that contact, teams will probably will pony up a nice return once everything is settled. Avs would probably be a 1st, Helleson, and Jost


Yeah, I don't think it would be easy to move Silf.

With Rico, I actually think there's a decent chance Seattle would take him without us having to give up a ton. There's not likely to be many options at C in the expansion draft, and he's still productive, even after a slow start (The whole team had a slow start though). Maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part, though I'd have no problem keeping him, as his contract only runs until he's 35. He's a decent mentor to some of the younger C's who are finally starting to show some solid signs of development on the team.

I'd probably do a 1st, Helleson and Jost for Rakell though. Does that mess up your guys expansion protection plan though?
11 mars 2021 à 10 h 24
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Lenny7
Yeah, I don't think it would be easy to move Silf.

With Rico, I actually think there's a decent chance Seattle would take him without us having to give up a ton. There's not likely to be many options at C in the expansion draft, and he's still productive, even after a slow start (The whole team had a slow start though). Maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part, though I'd have no problem keeping him, as his contract only runs until he's 35. He's a decent mentor to some of the younger C's who are finally starting to show some solid signs of development on the team.

I'd probably do a 1st, Helleson and Jost for Rakell though. Does that mess up your guys expansion protection plan though?


doesnt really mess up avs expansion plans bc Jost was probably protected due to his cheap cap hit. ITs all on the assumption that EJ waives his NMC, and at this point hes been hurt all season so at this rate he might even quality fo the pro rated long term injury clause of missing 60+ games. Even if hes not, why would they select a 33 year old Dman at 6m who has injury issues.

Protection would be:
Mackinnon Rantanen Landeskog Kadri Burakovsky Rackell Nichushkin
Makar Girard Toews

That leaves Compher Donskoi Graves for the to pick from
Lenny7 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage