SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Faksa Jarnkrok

Créé par: Richard88
Équipe: 2020-21 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 6 mars 2021
Publié: 6 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
DAL
  1. Kaut, Martin
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (COL)
2.
COL
  1. Järnkrok, Calle (1 000 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2023
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $80 321 429 $0 $5 000 000 $1 178 571 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
0 $0 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 mars 2021 à 18 h 9
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,431
Mentions "j'aime": 852
I really like the addition of Jarnkrok and honestly I’d rather give up a third or two instead of Jost just for depth reasons.

Faska however I don’t really like because of his term
6 mars 2021 à 18 h 27
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Is Faksa even an upgrade over Compher at this point? I would steer clear of him personally

Also would rather keep Jost than Jarnkrok, but that contract is nice with the retention

Haula seems like the best C trade target for the Avs in terms of quality for cost imo
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
6 mars 2021 à 18 h 31
#3
Go Preds
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 1,202
Mentions "j'aime": 450
Quoting: moli92
Is Faksa even an upgrade over Compher at this point? I would steer clear of him personally

Also would rather keep Jost than Jarnkrok, but that contract is nice with the retention

Haula seems like the best C trade target for the Avs in terms of quality for cost imo

We will give you Haula for a 3rd
UpsideDownQue a aimé ceci.
6 mars 2021 à 18 h 37
#4
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
Quoting: Pond_Duck
I really like the addition of Jarnkrok and honestly I’d rather give up a third or two instead of Jost just for depth reasons.

Faska however I don’t really like because of his term


Why is term on Faksa a problem? He's only 27 and has a good caphit for a 3C. He'd be a perfect addition.

Regarding Jarnkrok, keep in mind that there's the expansion draft to consider. If Avs add two 3rd liners someone would have to go to make room, and unless someone takes Compher Jost is the obvious trade chip.
villenash et Pond_Duck a aimé ceci.
6 mars 2021 à 18 h 39
#5
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
Quoting: moli92
Is Faksa even an upgrade over Compher at this point? I would steer clear of him personally

Also would rather keep Jost than Jarnkrok, but that contract is nice with the retention

Haula seems like the best C trade target for the Avs in terms of quality for cost imo


Faksa is a big upgrade. Big, physical 3C who wins draws, PK's, and brings an element of meanness.
villenash et EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
6 mars 2021 à 18 h 54
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 7,089
I’m not a big fan of Jost — I’d probably rather pick(s) for Jarnkrok.

Faksa would be a perfect target for this team if he ever becomes available though.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
6 mars 2021 à 19 h 27
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Pass on Faksa and his contract.
6 mars 2021 à 21 h 54
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: Richard88
Faksa is a big upgrade. Big, physical 3C who wins draws, PK's, and brings an element of meanness.


Avs already have the best PK in the league this year (with Compher on it) and Faksa hasn't been nearly as good this year as he has been in the past. Faceoffs are a non issue imo, and physicality/meanness isn't really unique to Faksa. His drop off in play right after signing a 5 year deal is really concerning imo

Id rather have Compher
6 mars 2021 à 21 h 56
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: Jwilliams2k12
We will give you Haula for a 3rd


I'd do that deal
Jwilliams2k12 a aimé ceci.
7 mars 2021 à 4 h 18
#10
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
Quoting: Xqb15a
Pass on Faksa and his contract.


Why? It's a good caphit for a solid 3C.
7 mars 2021 à 4 h 19
#11
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
Quoting: moli92
Avs already have the best PK in the league this year (with Compher on it) and Faksa hasn't been nearly as good this year as he has been in the past. Faceoffs are a non issue imo, and physicality/meanness isn't really unique to Faksa. His drop off in play right after signing a 5 year deal is really concerning imo

Id rather have Compher


To be fair to Faksa Dallas' season has been a mess with shutdowns and power outtages. Hard to look too hood when the entire team is faltering badly.
7 mars 2021 à 4 h 32
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Quoting: Richard88
Why? It's a good caphit for a solid 3C.


It’s 5yrs for a 3rd line player, Bowers and yes Jost who really seems to be finding his stride and role are cheaper and under control. Imo you don’t commit to that kind of term when you know you need financial flexibility in the coming years for guys Makar (if god forbid they sign him to a bridge), MacKinnon, Byram, Newhook, Toews, Burakovsky and another 2nd line winger, along with assumed 2nd contract for either of Barron or Helleson.
7 mars 2021 à 4 h 37
#13
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
Quoting: Xqb15a
It’s 5yrs for a 3rd line player, Bowers and yes Jost who really seems to be finding his stride and role are cheaper and under control. Imo you don’t commit to that kind of term when you know you need financial flexibility in the coming years for guys Makar (if god forbid they sign him to a bridge), MacKinnon, Byram, Newhook, Toews, Burakovsky and another 2nd line winger, along with assumed 2nd contract for either of Barron or Helleson.


If this team is to go anywhere they need to fix the 3C hole one way or another for the next few seasons. Faksa at $3.25m would fill that hole at a reasonable caphit.
7 mars 2021 à 10 h 5
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Quoting: Richard88
If this team is to go anywhere they need to fix the 3C hole one way or another for the next few seasons. Faksa at $3.25m would fill that hole at a reasonable caphit.


Except it isn’t, it’s 5 years. Compher has been abjectly bad this year, but equally as good is Tyson Jost there is who should be the 3C.
8 mars 2021 à 8 h 6
#15
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
Quoting: Xqb15a
Except it isn’t, it’s 5 years. Compher has been abjectly bad this year, but equally as good is Tyson Jost there is who should be the 3C.

What's the problem with it being 5 years? He's a solid player and it gives the team cost certainty at an important part of the lineup.

Jost simply doesn't produce enough offense at 5v5 to be a 3C.
8 mars 2021 à 9 h 14
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Quoting: Richard88
What's the problem with it being 5 years? He's a solid player and it gives the team cost certainty at an important part of the lineup.

Jost simply doesn't produce enough offense at 5v5 to be a 3C.


5 yrs for me is what you give core players. How important is it this off season that PEB and Calvert’s contracts come off the books? It’s the same concept, I’d rather have to fill bottom 6 with young and cheap guys then be struggling with money for top players. A year ago Compher’s contract wasn’t all that bad but all it has taken for most Avs fans to want to pay to get rid of him is 20 bad games. Cap flexibility for this team going forward is imperative and 5yr commitments to bottom 6 players isn’t doing that.

Tell me, in your opinion was Jost’s development messed up by rushing him? Yet the kid has found a way to evolve his game. I’d rather give Jost who you used the 10th overall pick on an opportunity to show he can grow into that role than to waste significant resources buying a fix.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage