I think out of all the notable exposures, MacEwan is most likely to be claimed to due to age and contract. Assuming that’s the case, Canucks would then do the Myers/Henrique trade and the Moore trade AFTER the expansion draft
I would imagine that the Canucks do what they can to keep MacEwen in the fold. Myers probly only gets taken in expansion draft if Canucks pay Seattle to take him. Like the idea of having Henrique as the 3C it would help the centre depth for sure. Bridge deals likely with Petey and Hughes.
I would imagine that the Canucks do what they can to keep MacEwen in the fold. Myers probly only gets taken in expansion draft if Canucks pay Seattle to take him. Like the idea of having Henrique as the 3C it would help the centre depth for sure. Bridge deals likely with Petey and Hughes.
Thanks for the feedback! I updated the description to address some of these points. I agree we may see petey and hughes sign smaller contracts for 3 year deals
As a canucks fan the Henrique for Myers swap is interesting. I think it could improve our centre depth and PP2 a ton. Don't know what the Ducks would think tho
You dont like Motte? He's been one of the better forwards in the bottom 6
No, I like him I'd just rather let him go considering he's a UFA in a year and I think MacEwen provides something that no one else on the team can or will.
That dcore is really bad, I don't think they would survive a full season.
The Canucks haven’t had a good D-core in years. All in all, I’d say this one is pretty good. Hughes and Schmidt are great. Rathbone has some potential to be top 4 but it’s yet to be seen. I’d say mayfield is a step up from Myers as far as reliability. I thinks it’s a fine d-core without any big commitments they can’t afford
PeteyForDaWin a aimé ceci.
Répondre
Podkolzin,
CapFriendly
CapFriendly