SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Money Moves

Créé par: Millertime24
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 3 mars 2021
Publié: 3 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Tanev, McCann, Kapanen looked like a very effective 3rd line. Not sure if this is enough for Forsberg? It seems like it's a lot to give up so I think its at least close.
Transactions
1.
2.
DET
  1. Riikola, Juuso
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $76 095 000 $0 $1 062 500 $5 405 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 23
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 7,088
NSH has no interest in that deal. It gives them too many defenseman to protect for expansion and the prospects aren't good enough to get Forsberg. PIT just doesn't have the futures to trade for high-end players right now.
gmgb a aimé ceci.
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 23
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 1,739
Mentions "j'aime": 971
I'd accept that from Wings pov
buffbry, Millertime24 et aedoran a aimé ceci.
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 24
#3
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,842
Mentions "j'aime": 5,306
Wings accept
Drw4209, Millertime24 et aedoran a aimé ceci.
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 38
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: villenash
NSH has no interest in that deal. It gives them too many defenseman to protect for expansion and the prospects aren't good enough to get Forsberg. PIT just doesn't have the futures to trade for high-end players right now.


It also leaves the pens with too many forwards to protect. They’d have to basically leave one of Zucker, Forsberg, Kapanen, Rust, or Guentzel exposed. I think for the pens, they would have to look at a rental. Someone like Gusev, Zajac, Hall, etc if they want top 9 forward help. Which I think they have pieces to get those types of topish end players
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 42
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 7,088
Quoting: Pensfan89
It also leaves the pens with too many forwards to protect. They’d have to basically leave one of Zucker, Forsberg, Kapanen, Rust, or Guentzel exposed. I think for the pens, they would have to look at a rental. Someone like Gusev, Zajac, Hall, etc if they want top 9 forward help. Which I think they have pieces to get those types of topish end players


Who would you be protecting over those forwards other than Crosby/Malkin? That is 7 forwards right there, and PIT would be poised to go 7-3-1. I don't see the issue. Marino and POJ are exempt, so only Letang, Dumoulin, and another D would need protection.
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 45
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: villenash
Who would you be protecting over those forwards other than Crosby/Malkin? That is 7 forwards right there, and PIT would be poised to go 7-3-1. I don't see the issue. Marino and POJ are exempt, so only Letang, Dumoulin, and another D would need protection.

Crosby, Malkin, Guentzel, Zucker, Forsberg, Kapanen, Rust, Blueger, McCann, ZAR, Tanev are all protectable. Although, as the pens are now, I think it’s gonna be Crosby, Malkin, Zucker, Guentzel, Kapanen, Rust, and Blueger. I think they leave McCann exposed as bait to stay away from ZAR and Tanev (although I think his contract my do that itself). I know they would not want to expose Blueger because of lack of center depth and the year he has had. That buzzsaw line is insanely good and underrated.
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 45
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
over pay on Ryan
Forsberg is a 1 1/2 year rental here. I don't think he resigns because he know the plane is running out of runway. He's never won
So I don't see them giving up all those future assets. They need quantity of good young players at this point. Not just 1 super star.
villenash a aimé ceci.
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 47
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 7,088
Quoting: Pensfan89
Crosby, Malkin, Guentzel, Zucker, Forsberg, Kapanen, Rust, Blueger, McCann, ZAR, Tanev are all protectable. Although, as the pens are now, I think it’s gonna be Crosby, Malkin, Zucker, Guentzel, Kapanen, Rust, and Blueger. I think they leave McCann exposed as bait to stay away from ZAR and Tanev (although I think his contract my do that itself).


But you would never leave one of the forwards you mentioned in your other post over McCann or Blueger in the first place. So I don't see how the expansion draft would even be a consideration for you if you're adding a player like Forsberg and then losing a McCann or Bleuger to the draft. Sure they're useful forwards to have in your bottom 6, but they are replaceable if you can get a player like Forsberg.
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 51
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: villenash
NSH has no interest in that deal. It gives them too many defenseman to protect for expansion and the prospects aren't good enough to get Forsberg. PIT just doesn't have the futures to trade for high-end players right now.


I would think if NSH trades Forsberg, they will probably trade Ekholm too? I think a Top 6 prospect, another prospect, a younger Top 4 D-Man and a 1st round pick is pretty close to what it would take to get Forsberg.
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 51
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: villenash
But you would never leave one of the forwards you mentioned in your other post over McCann or Blueger in the first place. So I don't see how the expansion draft would even be a consideration for you if you're adding a player like Forsberg and then losing a McCann or Bleuger to the draft. Sure they're useful forwards to have in your bottom 6, but they are replaceable if you can get a player like Forsberg.


the problem with losing Blueger is they only have 2 centers in the whole organization period. Everyone else is a 4th line guy at best. Most are really wingers.
This team has no depth. There is nothing in WBS to even call up really. They got some depth on the blueline and no where else other than what is in the CHL currently.

So you move Blueger and you are scrambling to over pay on the FA market for a C that you can't afford.
They can't really afford to lose him.
Pensfan89 a aimé ceci.
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 53
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: villenash
Who would you be protecting over those forwards other than Crosby/Malkin? That is 7 forwards right there, and PIT would be poised to go 7-3-1. I don't see the issue. Marino and POJ are exempt, so only Letang, Dumoulin, and another D would need protection.


I would be fine with exposing Zucker if it meant landing Forsberg.
villenash a aimé ceci.
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 53
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: villenash
But you would never leave one of the forwards you mentioned in your other post over McCann or Blueger in the first place. So I don't see how the expansion draft would even be a consideration for you if you're adding a player like Forsberg and then losing a McCann or Bleuger to the draft. Sure they're useful forwards to have in your bottom 6, but they are replaceable if you can get a player like Forsberg.


The pens don’t have time to wait to build a new 3C. They would almost guarantee protect Blueger over Rust, Kapanen, or Zucker in that situation. And that’s just an absolute waste and terrible asset management to let one of Blueger, Rust, Kapanen, or Zucker go for free. The only reason McCann is expendable is because Poulin should be ready next year and the ZAR-Blueger-Tanev line is too good to get rid of. And I’d hardly call McCann a bottom 6. He is a middle 6 winger lol.
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 54
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Millertime24
I would be fine with exposing Zucker if it meant landing Forsberg.


NVM i guess he has a NTC
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 55
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 7,088
Quoting: Millertime24
I would think if NSH trades Forsberg, they will probably trade Ekholm too? I think a Top 6 prospect, another prospect, a younger Top 4 D-Man and a 1st round pick is pretty close to what it would take to get Forsberg.


And if they trade Ekholm, they would still have to protect 4 D, which I doubt they'd want to do if they're trading Ekholm (Josi, Ellis, Fabbro, and in this case Pettersson).

When you write it like that, sure it sounds like a good mix for Forsberg, but the mix that PIT actually has to offer just isn't quality enough.
gmgb a aimé ceci.
3 mars 2021 à 9 h 57
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 7,088
Quoting: Pensfan89
The pens don’t have time to wait to build a new 3C. They would almost guarantee protect Blueger over Rust, Kapanen, or Zucker in that situation. And that’s just an absolute waste and terrible asset management to let one of Blueger, Rust, Kapanen, or Zucker go for free. The only reason McCann is expendable is because Poulin should be ready next year and the ZAR-Blueger-Tanev line is too good to get rid of. And I’d hardly call McCann a bottom 6. He is a middle 6 winger lol.


Bottom 6 was just easier to say when talking about both players (McCann + Bleuger) since he plays on the 3rd line, which is the bottom 6 of the forward group. I agree he's a middle 6 winger, but I wasn't taking a shot at McCann. I wouldn't get hung up on semantics -- the point was that he is replaceable if you trade for Forsberg.
3 mars 2021 à 10 h 0
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 7,088
Quoting: pharrow
the problem with losing Blueger is they only have 2 centers in the whole organization period. Everyone else is a 4th line guy at best. Most are really wingers.
This team has no depth. There is nothing in WBS to even call up really. They got some depth on the blueline and no where else other than what is in the CHL currently.

So you move Blueger and you are scrambling to over pay on the FA market for a C that you can't afford.
They can't really afford to lose him.


What do you think he'll resign for?
3 mars 2021 à 10 h 1
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: villenash
And if they trade Ekholm, they would still have to protect 4 D, which I doubt they'd want to do if they're trading Ekholm (Josi, Ellis, Fabbro, and in this case Pettersson).

When you write it like that, sure it sounds like a good mix for Forsberg, but the mix that PIT actually has to offer just isn't quality enough.


I guess it would come down to what management in NSH thinks of Poulin. I wrote it like that because that's what PIT is giving up in the trade. Like Pharrow said, Forsberg is a 1.5 year rental. I think it's a lot for PIT to give up, but if they win a Stanley Cup because of it then it's all worth it.
villenash a aimé ceci.
3 mars 2021 à 10 h 33
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 7,088
Quoting: Millertime24
I guess it would come down to what management in NSH thinks of Poulin. I wrote it like that because that's what PIT is giving up in the trade. Like Pharrow said, Forsberg is a 1.5 year rental. I think it's a lot for PIT to give up, but if they win a Stanley Cup because of it then it's all worth it.


That’s fair. But at the same time, NSH needs to maximize their return for their (probably) most valuable trade asset. Ultimately, I hope NSH just keeps him.
Millertime24 a aimé ceci.
3 mars 2021 à 11 h 10
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: villenash
Bottom 6 was just easier to say when talking about both players (McCann + Bleuger) since he plays on the 3rd line, which is the bottom 6 of the forward group. I agree he's a middle 6 winger, but I wasn't taking a shot at McCann. I wouldn't get hung up on semantics -- the point was that he is replaceable if you trade for Forsberg.


He is, However Blueger isn’t. And I would be willing to bet that if anyone of those forwards are exposed, including blueger, they would take them leaving the pens McCann. Which would be an issue for the pens and terrible asset management. Just like you guys trading Ekholm and getting MP in return. It makes no sense. If the trade included maybe Zucker instead of MP. Then you get a top 6 forward that’s less than Forsberg but get a good top 9 prospect, a 1st in a deeper draft, and another prospect that could be a decent 4th liner. Since you’d hope they just keep Forsberg and protect him anyway. You’d just protect Zucker to replace Forsberg and get a decent haul added to it. Then I think the pens would think about pulling the trigger and it might make a little more sense for Nashville too. Or they could just flip Zucker too and get more picks/prospects.
Millertime24 a aimé ceci.
3 mars 2021 à 11 h 25
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Pensfan89
He is, However Blueger isn’t. And I would be willing to bet that if anyone of those forwards are exposed, including blueger, they would take them leaving the pens McCann. Which would be an issue for the pens and terrible asset management. Just like you guys trading Ekholm and getting MP in return. It makes no sense. If the trade included maybe Zucker instead of MP. Then you get a top 6 forward that’s less than Forsberg but get a good top 9 prospect, a 1st in a deeper draft, and another prospect that could be a decent 4th liner. Since you’d hope they just keep Forsberg and protect him anyway. You’d just protect Zucker to replace Forsberg and get a decent haul added to it. Then I think the pens would think about pulling the trigger and it might make a little more sense for Nashville too. Or they could just flip Zucker too and get more picks/prospects.


That seems fair. If they actually did get someone like Forsberg, Zucker would be the odd man out anyways. I still think Pettersson is being undervalued a bit by other teams. He's a young cost controlled Top 4 D-Man. The emergence of Joseph makes him expandable for the Pens if they want.
Pensfan89 a aimé ceci.
3 mars 2021 à 11 h 33
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: Millertime24
That seems fair. If they actually did get someone like Forsberg, Zucker would be the odd man out anyways. I still think Pettersson is being undervalued a bit by other teams. He's a young cost controlled Top 4 D-Man. The emergence of Joseph makes him expandable for the Pens if they want.


They don’t really have to though. They would be trading MP at a loss tbh. Because even though Matheson is having a good year, he isn’t having a good enough one to quantify Seattle taking him over McCann, Tanev, ZAR, etc. so if they were to trade MP this year, they would basically be forced to protect Matheson or Riikola who Seattle won’t take regardless. Pens could get better value for MP or even Dumo if they want to go the younger and cheaper route in the offseason after the expansion draft when teams wouldn’t have to worry about protecting them.
Millertime24 a aimé ceci.
3 mars 2021 à 11 h 42
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Pensfan89
They don’t really have to though. They would be trading MP at a loss tbh. Because even though Matheson is having a good year, he isn’t having a good enough one to quantify Seattle taking him over McCann, Tanev, ZAR, etc. so if they were to trade MP this year, they would basically be forced to protect Matheson or Riikola who Seattle won’t take regardless. Pens could get better value for MP or even Dumo if they want to go the younger and cheaper route in the offseason after the expansion draft when teams wouldn’t have to worry about protecting them.


I would be completely fine with not moving Pettersson. I just think if the Pens are going to go all in this year, they need top 6 help. If Zucker is gonna be back I wouldn't make a big trade. I'd go after Bobby Ryan to play on Sids wing. I really liked the Tanev, McCann, Kapanen line too, they need to keep that in tact. I would keep Guentzel and Rust with Malkin and play Zucker and Ryan with Sid if they can swing a trade for Ryan. Either way, I think they are at least 1 top 6 forward away from having 4 solid lines. Ideally they should want to find a better 4th liner than Jank or Lafferty too.
3 mars 2021 à 14 h 42
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: villenash
What do you think he'll resign for?


I don't think it's per say the amount. It's the team. Why does he stay here in 2 years when the team is basically gray and done.
3 mars 2021 à 14 h 44
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 7,088
Quoting: pharrow
I don't think it's per say the amount. It's the team. Why does he stay here in 2 years when the team is basically gray and done.


Sorry, I meant Blueger.
3 mars 2021 à 14 h 45
#25
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: villenash
Sorry, I meant Blueger.


2 range.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage