SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blockbuster

Créé par: Propeller09
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 2 mars 2021
Publié: 2 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Hanifin, Noah
  2. Lucic, Milan (1 250 000 $ retained)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Clifton, Connor
  2. DeBrusk, Jake
  3. Moore, John
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
2.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $77 198 981 $964 222 $1 657 500 $4 301 019 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Bruins de Boston
894 167 $894 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $ (1 475 000 $$1M1 475 000 $$1M)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 mars 2021 à 22 h 1
#1
NoWah49
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,865
Mentions "j'aime": 1,432
CGY deal is interesting but Vancouver definitely says no
PeterForsberg21 a aimé ceci.
2 mars 2021 à 22 h 1
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Flames accept that for sure
2 mars 2021 à 22 h 2
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,880
Mentions "j'aime": 6,386
So a bunch of garbage for Miller. No Thanks
PeterForsberg21 a aimé ceci.
2 mars 2021 à 22 h 6
#4
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,063
Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
I like the vancouver deal, but the Canucks surely don’t.

That flames deal makes me want to throw up.
2 mars 2021 à 22 h 7
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Quoting: TheAlien
So a bunch of garbage for Miller


Yeah, pretty much. I do think Kase has some value if he can stay on the ice. Theory being, shut it down for the year, get healthy and you have a young guy under team control who for a short stretch not that long ago was probably a 10 RW in the league. Kuraly was for salary reasons and could be flipped for a 3rd or a desperate 1st like Goodrow - although 3rd is more likely.
2 mars 2021 à 22 h 14
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,880
Mentions "j'aime": 6,386
Quoting: Propeller09
Yeah, pretty much. I do think Kase has some value if he can stay on the ice. Theory being, shut it down for the year, get healthy and you have a young guy under team control who for a short stretch not that long ago was probably a 10 RW in the league. Kuraly was for salary reasons and could be flipped for a 3rd or a desperate 1st like Goodrow - although 3rd is more likely.


or hear me out we just keep Miller because that package is insulting
2 mars 2021 à 22 h 18
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Modifié 2 mars 2021 à 22 h 34
Quoting: Bcarlo25
I like the vancouver deal, but the Canucks surely don’t.

That flames deal makes me want to throw up.


Why? I think Lucic for 1.25m more over moore is worth the 3rd if for no other reason, in a pinch you know he would have chemistry with Krejci. Honestly, I just want someone to punch people in the face or grab them by the chin strap like Matt Martin did the other night to Frederic. I don't want RItchie and Frederic doing that stuff, they appear to be able to play a little. *In reference to Pastrnak and any of the skill Bruins players who are getting hit more than they used to.

It was Moore for Lucic and 3rd
Hanafin for Debrusk & 1st, but Feel like wasn't enough and Clifton seemed like a good sweetener.

I think that deal leaves them in very good position for Seattle too. They will end up probably losing Gryzelcyk, which wouldn't be great, but they would still have Zboril and Lauzon.
2 mars 2021 à 22 h 18
#8
Js31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 431
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Why would we give up a first in a deal bringing back Lucic when we just traded a first to shed backes
2 mars 2021 à 22 h 20
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,573
Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
Quoting: TheAlien
So a bunch of garbage for Miller. No Thanks


Actually the garbage is coming with Miller but whatever
2 mars 2021 à 22 h 26
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Modifié 2 mars 2021 à 22 h 33
Quoting: Js31
Why would we give up a first in a deal bringing back Lucic when we just traded a first to shed backes


JD + 1st for Hanafin
Moore for Lucic + 3rd

Felt like Calgary would want something more.

I only want lucic to protect Pastrnak. He has also always been a different player when motivated. You might be able to get a decent stretch out of him. At least this way they get a pick to shed moore.
2 mars 2021 à 22 h 39
#11
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,063
Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
Quoting: Propeller09
Why? I think Lucic for 1.25m more over moore is worth the 3rd if for no other reason, in a pinch you know he would have chemistry with Krejci. Honestly, I just want someone to punch people in the face or grab them by the chin strap like Matt Martin did the other night to Frederic. I don't want RItchie and Frederic doing that stuff, they appear to be able to play a little. *In reference to Pastrnak and any of the skill Bruins players who are getting hit more than they used to.

It was Moore for Lucic and 3rd
Hanafin for Debrusk & 1st, but Feel like wasn't enough and Clifton seemed like a good sweetener.

I think that deal leaves them in very good position for Seattle too. They will end up probably losing Gryzelcyk, which wouldn't be great, but they would still have Zboril and Lauzon.


Wouldn’t give up a first for hanifin. Wouldn’t do debrusk either.

How do we know of the chemistry of lucic and krejci?
2 mars 2021 à 22 h 44
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 2,771
Mentions "j'aime": 1,386
Easy no for VAN
3 mars 2021 à 12 h 18
#13
Bahston Brewins
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 893
Mentions "j'aime": 259
I think Noah Hanifin gets a tad bit overrated here. He's a struggling top 4 dman who looks like isn't improving like one might hope. I get he's the hometown boy and Boston has been targeting him since his draft year, but I think you overpaid for him in this deal. I'm not convinced he'll be this unreal top 4 dman here in Boston until I see it

I'd say Jake Debrusk for Noah Hanifin straight up would be a deal Calgary might consider
3 mars 2021 à 16 h 52
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 1,048
Mentions "j'aime": 326
Quoting: Propeller09
Yeah, pretty much. I do think Kase has some value if he can stay on the ice. Theory being, shut it down for the year, get healthy and you have a young guy under team control who for a short stretch not that long ago was probably a 10 RW in the league. Kuraly was for salary reasons and could be flipped for a 3rd or a desperate 1st like Goodrow - although 3rd is more likely.


Kase scored 20 G ONCE. Never was a 10 RW and never will be. Had injury history before Boston traded for him and obviously it still applies. You are trying to create value that is not there.
ngikas a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage