SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Buyout sharks

Créé par: vols94
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 1 mars 2021
Publié: 2 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Time to bite the bullet and just Buyout Vlasic and Jones. Maybe we can move another large contract to Seattle and then use the Cap space to take on some cap distressed assets with sweeteners.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
23 000 000 $
21 200 000 $
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
32 600 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $60 777 029 $0 $857 500 $20 722 971 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 mars 2021 à 0 h 16
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Unless we find another way to dump one of them, probable yes to Vlasic, but pass on Jones for now. We can live with Joner even if he doesn’t turn it around. Can just buy him out when the buyout penalty isn’t as harsh.
SJS2212 a aimé ceci.
2 mars 2021 à 0 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Yes please on Dreidger. I know the guy and hes awesome.
2 mars 2021 à 1 h 45
#3
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Vlasics buyout is absolutely terrible. Sucks but only way you can get rid of him at the moment is through trade. Maybe MTL could work some out with price. Idk

Jones I’m all for. Although tonight he looked great. Stopping 33 of 35 shots to the best offense in our division. Hope he can build off it.
2 mars 2021 à 7 h 34
#4
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: papishark
Yes please on Dreidger. I know the guy and hes awesome.


You mean you know him personally??
2 mars 2021 à 10 h 33
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
You mean you know him personally??


Yeah he played out his junior career in my city and my family knows his.
2 mars 2021 à 10 h 58
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,966
Mentions "j'aime": 4,538
Quoting: papishark
Yeah he played out his junior career in my city and my family knows his.


He looks like the real deal and is outplaying Bobby and it’s not close! I’d love to bring him over!
2 mars 2021 à 11 h 11
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
He looks like the real deal and is outplaying Bobby and it’s not close! I’d love to bring him over!


That would be pretty cool honestly.
2 mars 2021 à 11 h 22
#8
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
I wouldn't buy out Vlasic that early the penalty is just so brutal given the structure of the deal.
2 mars 2021 à 12 h 25
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,966
Mentions "j'aime": 4,538
Quoting: jfrojelin
I wouldn't buy out Vlasic that early the penalty is just so brutal given the structure of the deal.


Hope is he retires rather than continue to play like ****.
2 mars 2021 à 12 h 47
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 418
Mentions "j'aime": 225
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Unless we find another way to dump one of them, probable yes to Vlasic, but pass on Jones for now. We can live with Joner even if he doesn’t turn it around. Can just buy him out when the buyout penalty isn’t as harsh.


Agree entirely with this. If you're going to bring in a legitimate goalie like either of the two here to compete with him and take the #1 spot (rather than an equal like Dubnyk) then you can live with Jones as a backup or AHL demotion (if Melnichuk is perceived to be ready to play in the NHL) and buy him out later or just ride it out. The issue with Jones is that he's not a #1 but neither is Dubnyk so both are playing more than they ordinarily should be on a better team.

Vlasic on the other hand just flat out needs to be jettisoned anywhere. He is not NHL caliber even on the 3rd pair right now so getting rid of him from the roster is imperative to get new blood in there (Pasichnuk, Merkley, Meloche, etc.) just as much as it is to get the contract off the books.
2 mars 2021 à 12 h 50
#11
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Hope is he retires rather than continue to play like ****.


pull a boychuk
2 mars 2021 à 13 h 11
#12
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: papishark
Yeah he played out his junior career in my city and my family knows his.


Awesome!!
3 mars 2021 à 1 h 23
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,029
Mentions "j'aime": 973
Quoting: SJS2212
Agree entirely with this. If you're going to bring in a legitimate goalie like either of the two here to compete with him and take the #1 spot (rather than an equal like Dubnyk) then you can live with Jones as a backup or AHL demotion (if Melnichuk is perceived to be ready to play in the NHL) and buy him out later or just ride it out. The issue with Jones is that he's not a #1 but neither is Dubnyk so both are playing more than they ordinarily should be on a better team.

Vlasic on the other hand just flat out needs to be jettisoned anywhere. He is not NHL caliber even on the 3rd pair right now so getting rid of him from the roster is imperative to get new blood in there (Pasichnuk, Merkley, Meloche, etc.) just as much as it is to get the contract off the books.


The worst the Sharks can do is half measures. Vlasic just looks cooked and finished. If he cant defend then he is useless to San Jose. He might have one of the 5 worst contracts in the league because he has a NMC and is certainly not a top 4 D man anymore. I'm not even sure a Price or Skinner trade would even work and 50% retention for 5 yrs just makes no sense.

Jones this under 900 save % has gone on for 2 years now. i just dont see him turning it around to a 915%. The other players on this team deserve NHL quality goaltending which Jones cannot provide. i dont think attaching assets to move contracts is the right way for SJ. If we could get even league avg save % this team would be in the playoff conversation now.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage