SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trying to be good

Créé par: jfrojelin
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 1 mars 2021
Publié: 1 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
not that this team is particularly good, but this is how we build our best possible roster.

Sharks draft too late in 2021 to snag an NHL-ready guy
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 750 000 $
1900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 200 000 $
22 500 000 $
23 500 000 $
23 500 000 $
Transactions
SJS
ANA
  1. Burns, Brent
  2. Dahlén, Jonathan [Liste de réserve]
  3. Gambrell, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
seattle
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $63 923 696 $0 $967 500 $17 576 304 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
776 667 $776 667 $ (Bonis de performance110 000 $$110K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (875 000 $$875K875 000 $$875K)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 mars 2021 à 16 h 12
#1
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,057
Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
Modifié 1 mars 2021 à 16 h 17
The fact you have Karlsson on the third pair is just plain foolish plus Merkley is not NHL ready or top line ready
Klara a aimé ceci.
1 mars 2021 à 17 h 5
#2
Démarrer sujet
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: yikes
The fact you have Karlsson on the third pair is just plain foolish plus Merkley is not NHL ready or top line ready


for next season I see us running d pairings similar to how they were two days ago. Karlsson got to play against worse competition, restricted PK minutes, and outchance opponents. There's no point in trotting out A washed up Karlsson and pretending he will ever be near what he used to be. Thus, he needs a role he can flourish in, 20 min max and used in spots where he can succeed. He won't be the player he used to be ever, and should not get 25-28 min ever like he did to start the season.

Flip Larsson and Merkley if it is that worrisome. I've watched all the Cuda games and Merkley honestly looks good defensively, unless he is out longer than arounf 45 seconds, then he makes some half-assed plays. He will be in the NHL next season, mainly replacing Burns.
1 mars 2021 à 17 h 29
#3
shorks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 65
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Buying out Jones or Vlasic would be a viable option as well. Melinchuk is not NHL ready not even next year.Otherwise it's alright
1 mars 2021 à 18 h 26
#4
Démarrer sujet
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: Laniccal
Buying out Jones or Vlasic would be a viable option as well. Melinchuk is not NHL ready not even next year.Otherwise it's alright


Jones Buyout could be after 2020-21, but it is much more managable the season after imo. Vlasic's is so awful with its structure, buyout will not be soon
Laniccal a aimé ceci.
2 mars 2021 à 2 h 6
#5
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
This team confuses me. What’s it ceiling? Second round exit? After this year. Your most likely gonna lose a contact with Seattle and you might be able to make savvy deal with hertl to infuse your rebuild. 2 years of reloading and your back at it.
2 mars 2021 à 2 h 27
#6
Démarrer sujet
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: Ihaveajoner
This team confuses me. What’s it ceiling? Second round exit? After this year. Your most likely gonna lose a contact with Seattle and you might be able to make savvy deal with hertl to infuse your rebuild. 2 years of reloading and your back at it.


Imo Hertl is the deciding factor. If we keep him, we're trying a 2 year reload. If he's traded, it is long term rebuild mode
2 mars 2021 à 14 h 1
#7
shorks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 65
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Quoting: jfrojelin
Jones Buyout could be after 2020-21, but it is much more managable the season after imo. Vlasic's is so awful with its structure, buyout will not be soon


The Vlasic contract is horrid. Jones can still perform but at that cap hit? Not good.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage