SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mantha

Créé par: Bias4bruins
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 1 mars 2021
Publié: 1 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Do we have anything Det wants? I just like Mantha and spit balling here but don’t really know his value. Tough to get grit and scoring these days though.
Transactions
DET
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Lauko, Jakub
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
Maybe instead
Beecher
Urho
1st?
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 955 648 $964 222 $2 532 500 $1 544 352 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 mars 2021 à 11 h 54
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
They'd probably want Stud instead of DeBrusk, that's just my guess.
buffbry a aimé ceci.
1 mars 2021 à 11 h 55
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,532
Mentions "j'aime": 9,572
I'd be careful offering too much for Mantha. It just looks like he really doesn't want to put out effort right now. and I don't mean literal effort diving for pucks. I mean he doesn't even desire to try to be in the correct defensive positions. To me that's scarier than anything. It doesn't even look like he wants to play hockey right now.
Bias4bruins a aimé ceci.
1 mars 2021 à 11 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,785
Mentions "j'aime": 847
Studnicka and a 2021 1st please.
buffbry a aimé ceci.
1 mars 2021 à 11 h 58
#4
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,842
Mentions "j'aime": 5,306
Beacher, debrusk and a first.

Also like swayman if can work that in somehow
1 mars 2021 à 11 h 59
#5
Démarrer sujet
In Don we trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 200
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: buffbry
Beacher, debrusk and a first.

Also like swayman if can work that in somehow


Too much upside in swayman can’t let him go lol
1 mars 2021 à 12 h 9
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,493
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Never understood the Martha hype. Good player, but struggles to stay healthy and isn't great defensively.
1 mars 2021 à 12 h 21
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Bruins reject. Come on man. Mathna isnt that big an upgrade from debrusk if he is at all
1 mars 2021 à 12 h 22
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: buffbry
Beacher, debrusk and a first.

Also like swayman if can work that in somehow


Quoting: ZiggyPalffy
They'd probably want Stud instead of DeBrusk, that's just my guess.


Boys. Mantha is an upgrade from debrusk, but clearly not this big an upgrade. Bruins reject all of these offers.
Maybe debrusk and a 2nd for Mantha. but bruins still probably decline as they want a sniper

Come on be realistic here
1 mars 2021 à 12 h 28
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Boys. Mantha is an upgrade from debrusk, but clearly not this big an upgrade. Bruins reject all of these offers.
Maybe debrusk and a 2nd for Mantha. but bruins still probably decline as they want a sniper

Come on be realistic here

Have you seen Mantha's shot?
1 mars 2021 à 12 h 37
#10
Démarrer sujet
In Don we trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 200
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Boys. Mantha is an upgrade from debrusk, but clearly not this big an upgrade. Bruins reject all of these offers.
Maybe debrusk and a 2nd for Mantha. but bruins still probably decline as they want a sniper

Come on be realistic here



I get what your saying, but it seems you have to pay extra for things you want now a days, especially on here. He brings a big body with some skill and that’s tough to find and what we need for any playoff run. Like I said before, don’t really know his true value cause I’m not a Det fan, but the bruins lack a few things with an aging core and he checks a few boxes.
1 mars 2021 à 13 h 11
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,441
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Id pay Debrusk+1st max
1 mars 2021 à 13 h 23
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Boys. Mantha is an upgrade from debrusk, but clearly not this big an upgrade. Bruins reject all of these offers.
Maybe debrusk and a 2nd for Mantha. but bruins still probably decline as they want a sniper

Come on be realistic here


Mantha has been a 40- 50 point player on the worst team in the league. DeBrusk has been a 30-40 point player on one of the best teams in the league...

Mantha doesn't make sense for Boston, but acting like Stud and a 1st wouldn't be a starter for Detroit is ridiculous.

DeBrusk and a 2nd is an easy decline for Detroit.
1 mars 2021 à 13 h 25
#13
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,842
Mentions "j'aime": 5,306
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Boys. Mantha is an upgrade from debrusk, but clearly not this big an upgrade. Bruins reject all of these offers.
Maybe debrusk and a 2nd for Mantha. but bruins still probably decline as they want a sniper

Come on be realistic here


Then wings decline as well. We will get a good package for him if and when we decide to trade him. Debrusk + 2nd doenst move the needle and doesn't make sense. So we hold onto him
1 mars 2021 à 14 h 4
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: BStinson
Have you seen Mantha's shot?


Quoting: Bias4bruins
I get what your saying, but it seems you have to pay extra for things you want now a days, especially on here. He brings a big body with some skill and that’s tough to find and what we need for any playoff run. Like I said before, don’t really know his true value cause I’m not a Det fan, but the bruins lack a few things with an aging core and he checks a few boxes.


Quoting: ZiggyPalffy
Mantha has been a 40- 50 point player on the worst team in the league. DeBrusk has been a 30-40 point player on one of the best teams in the league...

Mantha doesn't make sense for Boston, but acting like Stud and a 1st wouldn't be a starter for Detroit is ridiculous.

DeBrusk and a 2nd is an easy decline for Detroit.


Quoting: buffbry
Then wings decline as well. We will get a good package for him if and when we decide to trade him. Debrusk + 2nd doenst move the needle and doesn't make sense. So we hold onto him


Im just being realistic and pointing out what the bruins would logically be willing to give up. If the wings dont like it, there might be another team in the market for him. Bruins arent it.
But yeah to say Debrusk and a 2nd "doesnt move the needle" is exactly my point, everyone just wants to rob the bruins on these trades lmaooooo
1 mars 2021 à 16 h 16
#15
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,842
Mentions "j'aime": 5,306
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Im just being realistic and pointing out what the bruins would logically be willing to give up. If the wings dont like it, there might be another team in the market for him. Bruins arent it.
But yeah to say Debrusk and a 2nd "doesnt move the needle" is exactly my point, everyone just wants to rob the bruins on these trades lmaooooo


Wasn't robbing you, was stating his value from our side. I agree not a match
1 mars 2021 à 16 h 19
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: buffbry
Wasn't robbing you, was stating his value from our side. I agree not a match


That being the case, my reccomendation for you would be to choose your words better.
"It doesnt move the needle" is what i would say to someone offering a 4th for Pasta, cuz that literally doesnt even add any value to a trade for pasta lol, that 4th is basically worthless.
In this case, not only does it move the needle, but its actually close to a good trade. so word choice is key lol
1 mars 2021 à 17 h 33
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Im just being realistic and pointing out what the bruins would logically be willing to give up. If the wings dont like it, there might be another team in the market for him. Bruins arent it.
But yeah to say Debrusk and a 2nd "doesnt move the needle" is exactly my point, everyone just wants to rob the bruins on these trades lmaooooo


I'm pretty sure Debrusk and a 2nd is robbing Detroit...

I don't know why you always have to be a pain in the ass over the smallest things. It's a trade and not an extremely unrealistic one since Mantha is a RW.

You overrating your prospects is your problem, but if you honestly think the starting point for Detroit won't be a 1st and Stud then you shouldn't be on here. That's more than a fair and reasonable asking price value-wise.

This site is all about throwing out ideas and trying out new concepts and you're literally the only one that complains about these things. Delete your ****ing account.
Bias4bruins a aimé ceci.
1 mars 2021 à 18 h 4
#18
Démarrer sujet
In Don we trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 200
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: ZiggyPalffy
I'm pretty sure Debrusk and a 2nd is robbing Detroit...

I don't know why you always have to be a pain in the ass over the smallest things. It's a trade and not an extremely unrealistic one since Mantha is a RW.

You overrating your prospects is your problem, but if you honestly think the starting point for Detroit won't be a 1st and Stud then you shouldn't be on here. That's more than a fair and reasonable asking price value-wise.

This site is all about throwing out ideas and trying out new concepts and you're literally the only one that complains about these things. Delete your ****ing account.


Absolutely 0 constructive criticism on this site, all about letting the hate out lol
1 mars 2021 à 21 h 10
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: ZiggyPalffy
I'm pretty sure Debrusk and a 2nd is robbing Detroit...

I don't know why you always have to be a pain in the ass over the smallest things. It's a trade and not an extremely unrealistic one since Mantha is a RW.

You overrating your prospects is your problem, but if you honestly think the starting point for Detroit won't be a 1st and Stud then you shouldn't be on here. That's more than a fair and reasonable asking price value-wise.

This site is all about throwing out ideas and trying out new concepts and you're literally the only one that complains about these things. Delete your ****ing account.


Quoting: Bias4bruins
Absolutely 0 constructive criticism on this site, all about letting the hate out lol


Thats the problem. I usually am the only one giving people constructive criticism. "Boys. Mantha is an upgrade from debrusk, but clearly not this big an upgrade. Bruins reject all of these offers.
Maybe debrusk and a 2nd for Mantha. but bruins still probably decline as they want a sniper"
Literally constructive criticism lol, if you disagree, thats up to you, but dont tell me im "overrating prosepcts" (there are no prospects here LMAO), or that "Absolutely 0 constructive criticism" (when i gave constructive criticism, or "you're literally the only one that complains about these things" (just false LMAO)

Come on boys. Just be logical!! Thats all I ever ask!
1 mars 2021 à 21 h 26
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Thats the problem. I usually am the only one giving people constructive criticism. "Boys. Mantha is an upgrade from debrusk, but clearly not this big an upgrade. Bruins reject all of these offers.
Maybe debrusk and a 2nd for Mantha. but bruins still probably decline as they want a sniper"
Literally constructive criticism lol, if you disagree, thats up to you, but dont tell me im "overrating prosepcts" (there are no prospects here LMAO), or that "Absolutely 0 constructive criticism" (when i gave constructive criticism, or "you're literally the only one that complains about these things" (just false LMAO)

Come on boys. Just be logical!! Thats all I ever ask!


You need a RW, DeBrusk plays LW. Mantha is an upgrade over Kase. Yeah definitely no logic here....
2 mars 2021 à 11 h 57
#21
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: ZiggyPalffy
You need a RW, DeBrusk plays LW. Mantha is an upgrade over Kase. Yeah definitely no logic here....


What happens when we trade away debrusk. Oh yeah now we need a LW lol.
Creating holes to fill other holes doesnt solve problems

Me = All Logic, You = forgetting important info lol
Dont try man, its a losing battle
2 mars 2021 à 12 h 2
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Thats the problem. I usually am the only one giving people constructive criticism. "Boys. Mantha is an upgrade from debrusk, but clearly not this big an upgrade. Bruins reject all of these offers.
Maybe debrusk and a 2nd for Mantha. but bruins still probably decline as they want a sniper"
Literally constructive criticism lol, if you disagree, thats up to you, but dont tell me im "overrating prosepcts" (there are no prospects here LMAO), or that "Absolutely 0 constructive criticism" (when i gave constructive criticism, or "you're literally the only one that complains about these things" (just false LMAO)

Come on boys. Just be logical!! Thats all I ever ask!

I gave you feedback. Mantha is a sniper. I even asked if you’ve seen his shot but you quoted me and didn’t even answer my question but went onto some irrelevant tangent about how you’d turn down Debrusk + 2nd and everyone tries to rob the Bruins. If you need a big bodied RW sniper that is extremely mobile for his size then Mantha is your man.
2 mars 2021 à 12 h 41
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: BStinson
I gave you feedback. Mantha is a sniper. I even asked if you’ve seen his shot but you quoted me and didn’t even answer my question but went onto some irrelevant tangent about how you’d turn down Debrusk + 2nd and everyone tries to rob the Bruins. If you need a big bodied RW sniper that is extremely mobile for his size then Mantha is your man.


I offered debrusk and a 2nd lol. Come on man
2 mars 2021 à 13 h 11
#24
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
What happens when we trade away debrusk. Oh yeah now we need a LW lol.
Creating holes to fill other holes doesnt solve problems

Me = All Logic, You = forgetting important info lol
Dont try man, its a losing battle


Ok big headed little guy... I literally said Detroit wouldn't want DeBrusk they'd want Stud and a 1st or something like that. You're the one that said "DeBrusk and a 2nd"

I guess that's what happens when you get lazy, can't read, and reply to 2 people at the same time...

Quit being a moron.
2 mars 2021 à 13 h 48
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
I offered debrusk and a 2nd lol. Come on man


I responded to you for saying “Maybe debrusk and a 2nd for Mantha. but bruins still probably decline as they want a sniper

Come on be realistic here”

Mantha = sniper, so I’d wager you’ve never seen him play or only a couple games. No point in Detroit downgrading in wingers for a late second round pick. We also aren’t great trading partners either.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage