SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

defense sell off coming

Créé par: pharrow
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 27 févr. 2021
Publié: 27 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Penguins are sellers at TDL even if they make the playoffs. With Zucker probably out and the team not really having assets to burn to make a move, they sell some assets and go with what they got. They simply aren't real cup contenders this year and it's better to build than self decive.
They don't have a ton of assets to sell but they have depth on the blue line they can part with,
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
Détails additionnels:
I would have taken a 4th here but WPG doesn't have one. They will need defensive depth going forward. Ceci can PK and can be a physical guy on their blueline in a 3rd pairing role or depth man if needed. The cost of a 3rd isn't much at all.
2.
PIT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
I think this is a solid move for AZ.
1st, it gives them solid depth down the LD side if they make the playoffs.
2nd They only got 2 guys under contract next year on their whole blueline.
3rd there were rumors of an OEL trade last offseason. Lets say AZ really does want to move on, This gives them a solid options for a 2LD. For a team that would only have 1 D man signed for next year if OEL is traded, that's a solid move.
Especially given the age of their blueline.
Goligoski is gonna be 36 and Hjalmarsson 34.
It helps them get younger on their blueline.
3.
PIT
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
With Friedman in Chad is gone.
TOR could use some depth on their RD.
The contract is league min, and 2 years. Neither of which should be a problem for TOR.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de CBJ
Logo de WPG
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $72 520 175 $0 $1 912 500 $8 979 825 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 févr. 2021 à 11 h 24
#1
TuckerKaberleSundin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,252
Mentions "j'aime": 630
There are so many ways Arizona could get younger on the blue line without trading away their much needed 2nd round pick for an average defenseman on an albatross contract. Ryan Murray got traded this offseason for a 5th round pick, he's a UFA and a better option than Matheson. There's Brandon Montour too. Ain't anyone giving up a high pick for Matheson.
27 févr. 2021 à 11 h 44
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Modifié 27 févr. 2021 à 11 h 51
Quoting: ArtturiLehkonen
There are so many ways Arizona could get younger on the blue line without trading away their much needed 2nd round pick for an average defenseman on an albatross contract. Ryan Murray got traded this offseason for a 5th round pick, he's a UFA and a better option than Matheson. There's Brandon Montour too. Ain't anyone giving up a high pick for Matheson.


A. I think you under rate Matheson.
B. he's not a rental, he's coming with term. And as much as you view that as bad, it's not.
C. I think you are over estimating the Defense market next year. The league is already very thin at defense in general. there are many teams in need of it. Next you get 6 more defense positions are opening up, making the league even thinner. And Seattle is gonna grab defense from a few teams. Which means whatever else is out there, everyone else is going to be over bidding on.
AZ is in the same bad position as DET. Who doesn't really have a lot of defensemen going into next year. They need to get younger and faster.
Finding that many defensemen to improve is not going to be easy in the current climate. That's just something you are going to have to realize.
This is why Gudbranson kept getting moved when everyone wanted to hate on him. The league is just thin and that is going to get worse.
Matheson is a much better player than he was. He went for a 5th this summer. Matheson should probably return a 2nd as he can actually play 2LD and that is roughly what a low end 2LD costs. Where a higher one is going to cost a 1st +.
So the value here really isn't off, and AZ won't have nearly as easy of a time picking up defense next year unless they want to go with their very old players.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
27 févr. 2021 à 11 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,581
Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
The leafs absolutely do not need bottom pairing defenders
27 févr. 2021 à 12 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 873
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Coyotes need RD not LD and as mentioned above they’re not giving up a second round pick for Matheson
27 févr. 2021 à 12 h 59
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,706
Mentions "j'aime": 6,973
Ceci isn't worth anywhere close to a 4th and the Jets have no need for bottom pairing or lower defensemen.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage