SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Which makes most sense at TDL

Créé par: Shane_Kelly
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 27 févr. 2021
Publié: 27 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let me know what you think. About these deals. I doubt Hertl will be available but if he is, I am very on board with acquiring him.
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Hertl, Tomas
Détails additionnels:
Bruins Bring in a legit top 6 forward with term left (2 years). This gives them a 2 line RW and someone who can play center, giving them flexibility in the offseason depending on Krejci.
SJS
    Debrusk
    2nd Round Pick
    3rd Round Pick

    OR
    Kase
    1st Rounder
    2.
    VAN
      conditional 3rd rounder maybe?
      I would say his value is pretty low as of right now but there will be those people in here saying "he was a high 1st rounder he has value"
      3.
      NSH
        Vaak
        1st round pick
        this should get it done IMO, it may even take less than that
        4.
        DET
          Late round pick. Sweeney loves these type of guys (I honestly wouldn't mind getting him this year if this isn't the only move)
          5.
          BOS
          1. Staal, Marc (2 850 000 $ retained)
          DET
            Late Round Pick depth vet defenseman (bruins need that right now)
            6.
            CGY
              2nd round pick
              Depth forward, who has a decent showing in the playoffs last season so I am not opposed to getting him, but a 2nd might be too high for me.
              7.
              BOS
              1. Palmieri, Kyle
              Détails additionnels:
              This is one that I love just like the Hertl trade. An established top 6 guy, proven scorer, plays with grit and fits the Bruins system well.. They have been tied to him for sometime, but as of right now I don't think he is available as the Devils are in the race for a playoff spot so time will tell.
              NJD
                Bjork
                1st rounder
                4th rounder for retention
                Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
                Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
                2021
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de TOR
                2022
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                2023
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                Logo de BOS
                TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
                2781 500 000 $93 061 481 $964 222 $2 407 500 $-11 561 481 $
                Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
                AG
                NMC
                UFA - 5
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
                C
                M-NTC, NMC
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
                AD
                UFA - 3
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
                C
                M-NTC
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
                AD
                UFA - 3
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
                C, AD
                M-NTC, NMC
                UFA - 6
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
                AD, C
                UFA - 3
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
                AG
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
                C, AG
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
                AD, C
                RFA - 2
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
                AG, AD
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
                2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
                AD, AG
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Sharks de San Jose
                5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
                C
                M-NTC
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
                AD, AG
                M-NTC
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
                1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
                C, AD, AG
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Flames de Calgary
                2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
                C
                UFA - 1
                Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
                DG
                UFA - 3
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
                DD
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
                G
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
                DD
                UFA - 3
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
                DD
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
                G
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
                DD
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                725 000 $725 000 $
                DG/DD
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                800 000 $800 000 $
                DD
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Predators de Nashville
                3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
                DG/DD
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
                2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
                DG
                NMC
                UFA - 1
                Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
                DG
                UFA - 4
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
                AD, AG
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                850 000 $850 000 $
                DG/DD
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
                AD
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
                AG, AD
                UFA - 3
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
                DG/DD
                RFA - 2
                Équipe de réserve
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
                AD
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
                G
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Bruins de Boston
                700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
                C, AG
                UFA - 1

                Code d'intégration

                • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
                • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

                Texte intégré

                Cliquer pour surligner
                27 févr. 2021 à 9 h 47
                #1
                Buffbry
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: août 2017
                Messages: 8,844
                Mentions "j'aime": 5,309
                Lgd and staal each will cost around a 3rd, especially retained.
                Shane_Kelly a aimé ceci.
                27 févr. 2021 à 9 h 50
                #2
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juin 2016
                Messages: 12,565
                Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
                Not sure how much RW Hertl has played but I think he has mostly played C in the past years. Anyways, it's not enough for Hertl.
                "This gives them a 2 line RW" Bruins have Kase. Same for the Palmieri deal.

                Ekholm will depend on what the Bruins can give. Staal sucks, I would play Moore over him. Agreed with Glendening. I'm not of fan of Bennett or Virtanen but one of them could end up being a Bruin so we'll see.
                FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
                27 févr. 2021 à 9 h 55
                #3
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2018
                Messages: 3,921
                Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
                What would the conditions be for the Van trade?
                27 févr. 2021 à 9 h 56
                #4
                Démarrer sujet
                Shane Kelly
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2019
                Messages: 854
                Mentions "j'aime": 296
                Quoting: bhavikp27
                Not sure how much RW Hertl has played but I think he has mostly played C in the past years. Anyways, it's not enough for Hertl.
                "This gives them a 2 line RW" Bruins have Kase. Same for the Palmieri deal.

                Ekholm will depend on what the Bruins can give. Staal sucks, I would play Moore over him. Agreed with Glendening. I'm not of fan of Bennett or Virtanen but one of them could end up being a Bruin so we'll see.


                Lets face it, Kase deal was a mistake. Bruins took a chance on him and it has not paid off, so it's time to move on. When Kase is in the lineup, he has proven he is not a top 6 forward. But I think moving Debrusk in the Herlt deal will be enough.
                27 févr. 2021 à 9 h 56
                #5
                Démarrer sujet
                Shane Kelly
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2019
                Messages: 854
                Mentions "j'aime": 296
                Quoting: sedin33
                What would the conditions be for the Van trade?


                Somethin depending on his performance, like if he plays X amount of games or gets X amount of points
                27 févr. 2021 à 9 h 57
                #6
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2018
                Messages: 3,921
                Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
                Quoting: Shane_Kelly
                Somethin depending on his performance, like if he plays X amount of games or gets X amount of points


                Van passes. The 3rd round pick would need to be in this year's draft.
                27 févr. 2021 à 9 h 58
                #7
                Démarrer sujet
                Shane Kelly
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2019
                Messages: 854
                Mentions "j'aime": 296
                Quoting: buffbry
                Lgd and staal each will cost around a 3rd, especially retained.


                I think Glendening is worth a 4th at most, but because of how valuable he will be to so many teams this year he may just get a second. I.E Barclay Goodrow getting a 1st (cause of term)
                buffbry a aimé ceci.
                27 févr. 2021 à 9 h 58
                #8
                Démarrer sujet
                Shane Kelly
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2019
                Messages: 854
                Mentions "j'aime": 296
                Quoting: sedin33
                Van passes. The 3rd round pick would need to be in this year's draft.


                At this point though, something is better than him being a scarth.
                27 févr. 2021 à 10 h 4
                #9
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2018
                Messages: 3,921
                Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
                Quoting: Shane_Kelly
                At this point though, something is better than him being a scarth.


                I think Virtanen nets a 3rd at the very least.
                27 févr. 2021 à 10 h 11
                #10
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: janv. 2021
                Messages: 1,047
                Mentions "j'aime": 325
                Quoting: bhavikp27
                Not sure how much RW Hertl has played but I think he has mostly played C in the past years. Anyways, it's not enough for Hertl.
                "This gives them a 2 line RW" Bruins have Kase. Same for the Palmieri deal.

                Ekholm will depend on what the Bruins can give. Staal sucks, I would play Moore over him. Agreed with Glendening. I'm not of fan of Bennett or Virtanen but one of them could end up being a Bruin so we'll see.


                WHEN are the Bruins going to HAVE Kase and WHEN is he going to produce?
                Shane_Kelly a aimé ceci.
                27 févr. 2021 à 10 h 18
                #11
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juin 2016
                Messages: 2,851
                Mentions "j'aime": 639
                Quoting: Shane_Kelly
                Lets face it, Kase deal was a mistake. Bruins took a chance on him and it has not paid off, so it's time to move on. When Kase is in the lineup, he has proven he is not a top 6 forward. But I think moving Debrusk in the Herlt deal will be enough.


                I am not sure how you can say that and then say that you think Debrusk is enough to get Hertl.
                Health is certainly a concern for Kase - No doubt, but you said when healthy he isn't a top 6. Interesting because statistically they are almost identical. Kase is cheaper and under team control. They are pretty much the same age as well.

                Debrusk played in 13 playoff games and had 4 goals.
                Kase played in 11 playoff games and had 4 Assists.

                Debrusk has 4pts (1 goal) in his last 16 regular season games.
                Kase has 1 pt in 7.5 games with the Bruins.

                Kase is also ELITE defensively. JD, not so much.

                I get the health thing, and he needs to finish more, but it's there. Thing about stats is they tend to balance out. Yes he is 0 for 26 on SOG since joining the Bruins, but that won't last. He'll go 6/9 over some stretch. He is creating chances. New team, Covid, and injury. I am not willing to call it a mistake. He isn't getting benched. He isn't a empty shirt. He just isn't finishing. Which - JD has 1 goal. One.

                If they can get Kase back healthy. It's huge.
                bhavikp27 et KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
                27 févr. 2021 à 10 h 21
                #12
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juin 2016
                Messages: 12,565
                Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
                Quoting: Shane_Kelly
                Lets face it, Kase deal was a mistake. Bruins took a chance on him and it has not paid off, so it's time to move on. When Kase is in the lineup, he has proven he is not a top 6 forward. But I think moving Debrusk in the Herlt deal will be enough.


                100% disagree. It's one of the few great trades done by Sweeney and IMO, he is a top6 F.

                Quoting: BruinsCharlies
                WHEN are the Bruins going to HAVE Kase and WHEN is he going to produce?


                He is skating. Kase doesn't have control on his injury.
                KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
                27 févr. 2021 à 10 h 32
                #13
                Démarrer sujet
                Shane Kelly
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2019
                Messages: 854
                Mentions "j'aime": 296
                Modifié 27 févr. 2021 à 10 h 38
                Quoting: Propeller09
                I am not sure how you can say that and then say that you think Debrusk is enough to get Hertl.
                Health is certainly a concern for Kase - No doubt, but you said when healthy he isn't a top 6. Interesting because statistically they are almost identical. Kase is cheaper and under team control. They are pretty much the same age as well.

                Debrusk played in 13 playoff games and had 4 goals.
                Kase played in 11 playoff games and had 4 Assists.

                Debrusk has 4pts (1 goal) in his last 16 regular season games.
                Kase has 1 pt in 7.5 games with the Bruins.

                Kase is also ELITE defensively. JD, not so much.

                I get the health thing, and he needs to finish more, but it's there. Thing about stats is they tend to balance out. Yes he is 0 for 26 on SOG since joining the Bruins, but that won't last. He'll go 6/9 over some stretch. He is creating chances. New team, Covid, and injury. I am not willing to call it a mistake. He isn't getting benched. He isn't a empty shirt. He just isn't finishing. Which - JD has 1 goal. One.

                If they can get Kase back healthy. It's huge.


                First, I think Debrusk is a picee in the Hertl deal, hence the 2nd to go with it. And Having someone who is elite defensively but doesn't produce is not what the Bruins need. They need someone not names Marchand Bergeron and Pastrnak to score. They don't have that. With this aging core, they can't wait around for these guys like Debrusk Kase and Bjork to find their scoring touch. They just don't have that time. If they want to win the cup one more time, then they have to sacrifice a piece like Debrusk or Kase or Bjork or Vaak or a 1st to do so. And I think teams see much more potential in Derbsuk than in Kase. Considering the injury risk.
                BruinsCharlies a aimé ceci.
                27 févr. 2021 à 10 h 32
                #14
                Démarrer sujet
                Shane Kelly
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2019
                Messages: 854
                Mentions "j'aime": 296
                Quoting: bhavikp27
                100% disagree. It's one of the few great trades done by Sweeney and IMO, he is a top6 F.



                He is skating. Kase doesn't have control on his injury.


                Look. being an "analytical Darling" is nice and all but this team NEEDS DEPTH SCORING.
                BruinsCharlies a aimé ceci.
                27 févr. 2021 à 10 h 50
                #15
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juin 2016
                Messages: 2,851
                Mentions "j'aime": 639
                Quoting: Shane_Kelly
                First, I think Debrusk is a picee in the Hertl deal, hence the two 2nds to go with it. And Having someone who is elite defensively but doesn't produce is not what the Bruins need. They need someone not names Marchand Bergeron and Pastrnak to score. They don't have that. With this aging core, they can't wait around for these guys like Debrusk Kase and Bjork to find their scoring touch. They just don't have that time. If they want to win the cup one more time, then they have to sacrifice a piece like Debrusk or Kase or Bjork or Vaak or a 1st to do so.


                I don't disagree with moving on, per say. I think the Bruins would be selling very low on Kase. As you would Debrusk. I think they are both better than they have played, but I honestly think Kase ceiling is much higher. I think if you can get Kase healthy, he will be that secondary scoring. I don't want to give up the assets for as similar player. Hertl has also had troubles staying healthy and has only really had one season where he scored. He has one season with more than 22 goals. I believe both Kase and Debrusk could do that. I understand the center aspect, but... Krejci for one more at 5m is a good thing. He is still a 50-60pt center and has always been a playoff beast. Hertl will be UFA and seeking $. Again, I like him, but 1 season with more than 22 goals amd 1 50pts season.

                Why Trade Bjork now? I mean obviously if you can get a team to pay on potential, then by all means, but not as an add on. He is cheap and finally playing well.

                He is also a potential Seattle pick or lure away from Zboril/Lauzon. Doubtful, but maybe.

                I need to see where they are closer to deadline. I am feeling more comfortable with Studnicka. This call up has been noticeably different.
                bhavikp27 et KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
                27 févr. 2021 à 10 h 50
                #16
                Go Preds
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juin 2016
                Messages: 1,202
                Mentions "j'aime": 450
                Nashville passes
                27 févr. 2021 à 11 h 11
                #17
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: mai 2016
                Messages: 11,496
                Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
                Quoting: Jwilliams2k12
                Nashville passes


                What do you think your getting for Ekholm? That's a 1st + prospect w/ top 4 upside (currently playing 1st pairing w/ McAvoy) whose exempt from the expansion draft.
                27 févr. 2021 à 11 h 33
                #18
                Bcarlo25
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: mai 2018
                Messages: 20,833
                Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
                None of these. Find a LD rental. That’s it.
                27 févr. 2021 à 11 h 57
                #19
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: janv. 2021
                Messages: 1,047
                Mentions "j'aime": 325
                Quoting: Jwilliams2k12
                Nashville passes


                So tell me what Nashville wants for Ekholm from the Bruins or anyone else for that matter.
                27 févr. 2021 à 11 h 57
                #20
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juin 2016
                Messages: 12,565
                Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
                Quoting: Shane_Kelly
                Look. being an "analytical Darling" is nice and all but this team NEEDS DEPTH SCORING.


                Yes and you can't control injuries as I said. Personally, the problem isn't only the players; at least, not this year. They needed a RW2 for the past years but they now have enough top9 options (when healthy). Part of the issue is the system and Cassidy is the one that needs to work on that. 4th full season and hasn't been able get it done (so far).

                They also need a top4 LD.
                27 févr. 2021 à 12 h 11
                #21
                Go Preds
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juin 2016
                Messages: 1,202
                Mentions "j'aime": 450
                Quoting: ON3M4N
                What do you think your getting for Ekholm? That's a 1st + prospect w/ top 4 upside (currently playing 1st pairing w/ McAvoy) whose exempt from the expansion draft.



                Only thing for me is that the first is gonna be late. Throw in a later pick and I’ll be good with it.
                27 févr. 2021 à 12 h 12
                #22
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: janv. 2021
                Messages: 1,047
                Mentions "j'aime": 325
                Quoting: bhavikp27
                Yes and you can't control injuries as I said. Personally, the problem isn't only the players; at least, not this year. They needed a RW2 for the past years but they now have enough top9 options (when healthy). Part of the issue is the system and Cassidy is the one that needs to work on that. 4th full season and hasn't been able get it done (so far).

                They also need a top4 LD.

                "
                Don't put this on Cassidy. His system is fine. His results are the envy of almost every team. Just came up one game short 2 years ago. Funny, wasn't "the system" one of the main reasons they got rid of Claude.
                27 févr. 2021 à 12 h 16
                #23
                Bad Take Bot v1.02
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: août 2019
                Messages: 2,683
                Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
                Sharks easily decline, poor value going to SJ.
                27 févr. 2021 à 12 h 16
                #24
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juin 2016
                Messages: 12,565
                Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
                Quoting: BruinsCharlies
                "
                Don't put this on Cassidy. His system is fine. His results are the envy of almost every team. Just came up one game short 2 years ago. Funny, wasn't "the system" one of the main reasons they got rid of Claude.


                "His results are the envy of almost every team"
                Overall, yes. His 5v5 results, no.

                "Just came up one game short 2 years ago"
                And the Bruins lost because of what? Couldn't score a 5v5 goal in the finals.

                I believe Cassidy is one of the best coaches in this league but 5v5 is the only thing the Bruins are lacking and the problem isn't the personal only.
                You're free to disagree.
                27 févr. 2021 à 12 h 20
                #25
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juin 2016
                Messages: 2,851
                Mentions "j'aime": 639
                Quoting: Klara
                Sharks easily decline, poor value going to SJ.


                One season over 22g. One season over 46pts. It's not that far off. That is assuming either of these guys starts producing. If they don't, you are right.
                 
                Répondre
                To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
                Question:
                Options:
                Ajouter une option
                Soumettre le sondage