Um... the avs

I doubt avs do that on NHL games

I'd say Colorado. Rantanen is better than Nylander and Andersen is better than Grubauer, but I dont think the difference between Andersen and Grubauer makes up the difference between Rantanen and Nylander

Honestly Rantanen and Nylander are equally as good... just different type of players

not even close. raantanen can put up 90. nylander isn't capable of that

Grubauer is better, cheaper, and younger than Andersen; both are rentals. Rantanen is better, but more expensive, than Nylander.

It's an easy no from COL.

Even if TOR started adding firsts, Avalanche with a resounding no.

Hahahaha < Joe's response just before he hangs up!

U think that bc you’re a Leafs fan
But let’s just say they are equally good....
why would the AVs trade a guy they KNOW fits in perfectly,
for an UNKNOWN like Nylander would be?
Just doesn’t make sense for them
*unless they think that Andersen is a MAJOR upgrade over Grubauer, which he’s not

The avs obviously.

Nylander isn’t as good as Rantanen, Rantanen ppg is almost .2ppg better has scored more goals and more assists in fewer games, and Grubauer is better than Andersen especially in the playoffs. Hard fast easy no from COL.

lopsided trade. switch rantanen for burakovsky.

Yes, and Rantanen will be better than Nylander for four years plus, while Andersen will be better than Grubauer for only the remainder of this season.

The avs and that’s not even an difficult one for them

THIS IS BAD. Avs decline immeadietly.

dont look at points its so misleading especially because they play with different players... look at the advanced stats on evolving hockey. they are isolated stats.