SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Could this be something Tkachuk

Créé par: PeterK
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 25 févr. 2021
Publié: 25 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just imagine the battle of Ontario, Toronto vs Ottawa with the Tkachuk brothers on both teams! Damn that'd be good. I hear he has caused a stir with his teammates in Calgary so why not get Nylander for him. Add a Timothy Liljegren if you need to or a 2nd round pick.
Transactions
CGY
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. Nylander, William
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
I think the 2nd rounder OR Liljegren would be fair but those intangibles man. Never know what they are going to cost you.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $68 539 865 $0 $857 500 $12 960 135 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
875 000 $875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Flames de Calgary
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 févr. 2021 à 6 h 27
#1
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
I too would like the "sweetener" to be future top-4 stud.. stop it.. I would love Tkachuk on Leafs, but I would not be adding that much value to Nylander if Im getting him..
25 févr. 2021 à 6 h 29
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 712
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: SammyT_51
I too would like the "sweetener" to be future top-4 stud.. stop it.


That is what we thought a few years ago. Liljegren won't be a stud. Or rather it is looking less likely. He was passed easily by Rasmus Sandin. He will be an NHLer but Tkachuk is a serious commodity.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
25 févr. 2021 à 6 h 30
#3
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Quoting: PeterK
That is what we thought a few years ago. Liljegren won't be a stud. Or rather it is looking less likely. He will be an NHLer but Tkachuk is a serious commodity.


He is 21 years old LMFAO, He is on SAME path as Rasmus Andersson LOL
25 févr. 2021 à 6 h 33
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,293
Flames aren't moving Tkachuk so no
csick a aimé ceci.
25 févr. 2021 à 6 h 39
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 712
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: SammyT_51
He is 21 years old LMFAO, He is on SAME path as Rasmus Andersson LOL


Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Flames aren't moving Tkachuk so no


Getting different opinions. This is exactly why Liljegren might be added. Tkachuk >> Nylander in terms of value. I love Nylander but he wouldn't be enough to get Tkachuk so you add Liljegren. Toronto has a wave of Dmen prospects coming plus their D core is quite young so they have some time. Liljegren MIGHT be a stud but far from a sure thing. You want the Leafs to win in the playoffs? Then you need to pay up for a guy like Tkachuk. It is easy to see the team lacking since Wayne Simmonds has gone down with injury. They need that kind of presence.

Imagine that top line: Matthews - Marner - Tkachuk. Who could match that line?
25 févr. 2021 à 6 h 42
#6
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Quoting: PeterK
Getting different opinions. This is exactly why Liljegren might be added. Tkachuk >> Nylander in terms of value. I love Nylander but he wouldn't be enough to get Tkachuk so you add Liljegren. Toronto has a wave of Dmen prospects coming plus their D core is quite young so they have some time. Liljegren MIGHT be a stud but far from a sure thing. You want the Leafs to win in the playoffs? Then you need to pay up for a guy like Tkachuk. It is easy to see the team lacking since Wayne Simmonds has gone down with injury. They need that kind of presence.

Imagine that top line: Matthews - Marner - Tkachuk. Who could match that line?


Tkachuk wont go from CGY and Leafs are not trading Liljegren.. you wanna be contender? You develop your defense and play players who you develop within your system. CGY aint selling Tkachuk and Leafs shouldnt move Liljegren because he is gonna be a stud. If you dont believe in Liljegren, tell me exactly why he wont be a stud. Im waiting.
25 févr. 2021 à 6 h 45
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 712
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: SammyT_51
Tkachuk wont go from CGY and Leafs are not trading Liljegren.. you wanna be contender? You develop your defense and play players who you develop within your system. CGY aint selling Tkachuk and Leafs shouldnt move Liljegren because he is gonna be a stud.


Did you have a bad sleep? You are awfully grumpy this morning. You really like Liljegren huh.
25 févr. 2021 à 6 h 48
#8
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Quoting: PeterK
Did you have a bad sleep? You are awfully grumpy this morning. You really like Liljegren huh.


Had a great sleep. It just pisses me off that each trade begins and ends with Liljegren being moved which is the most ridiculous bull**** ever since he is on same career path as Rasmus Andersson who is now probably the second best Flames D behind Gio and would be first once Gio finishes his career. Same career path.. yes I do really like Liljegren, because I know what he brings and what he develops into and that something is a top-4 stud and it makes ZERO sense to throw him into a deal as a "throw-in".. thats literally exact opposite of what contenders do. They develop their own talent and use them properly..
25 févr. 2021 à 7 h 8
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 712
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: SammyT_51
Had a great sleep. It just pisses me off that each trade begins and ends with Liljegren being moved which is the most ridiculous bull**** ever since he is on same career path as Rasmus Andersson who is now probably the second best Flames D behind Gio and would be first once Gio finishes his career. Same career path.. yes I do really like Liljegren, because I know what he brings and what he develops into and that something is a top-4 stud and it makes ZERO sense to throw him into a deal as a "throw-in".. thats literally exact opposite of what contenders do. They develop their own talent and use them properly..


Hahaha, ok Mr. angry. How about instead of getting yourself all worked up about lily, actually think about what you might trade for Tkachuk? We have different opinions on Liljegren clearly but luckily I don't get worked up over hypothetical trades.
25 févr. 2021 à 7 h 9
#10
Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 3,548
Mentions "j'aime": 1,582
That is BAD trade for Calgary. Tkachuk and Nylander are almost equals in terms of goals/points but Tkachuk is worth SO MUCH MORE. When Nylander is cold he's just a pretty skater. In 21 games, avg 16:30 TOI/g, he has 7 hits. So he's not forechecking or defending... He's also 3 seasons away from being a UFA. Tkachuk lives in the crease and plays a role in for far more of Calgary's goals than the score sheet reflects. In his 20 games this season he has 66 hits. So he's never NOT noticeable. He'll also be an RFA when his contract ends.
Toronto was never better (in my lifetime) than when they had Gary Roberts. Josh Anderson would've been a great pick up, instead they went after Wayne Simmonds ....6 years too late.
25 févr. 2021 à 7 h 11
#11
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Quoting: PeterK
Hahaha, ok Mr. angry. How about instead of getting yourself all worked up about lily, actually think about what you might trade for Tkachuk? We have different opinions on Liljegren clearly but luckily I don't get worked up over hypothetical trades.


I dont either, its just observation I made.. as for Tkachuk value.. Id definitely do Nylander+, but that plus is not gonna be that huge.. the difference between Tkachuk and Willy is not that huge that you need to include future top-4 D in the trade lol
25 févr. 2021 à 7 h 12
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 712
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: TCMonkey
That is BAD trade for Calgary. Tkachuk and Nylander are almost equals in terms of goals/points but Tkachuk is worth SO MUCH MORE. When Nylander is cold he's just a pretty skater. In 21 games, avg 16:30 TOI/g, he has 7 hits. So he's not forechecking or defending... He's also 3 seasons away from being a UFA. Tkachuk lives in the crease and plays a role in for far more of Calgary's goals than the score sheet reflects. In his 20 games this season he has 66 hits. So he's never NOT noticeable. He'll also be an RFA when his contract ends.
Toronto was never better (in my lifetime) than when they had Gary Roberts. Josh Anderson would've been a great pick up, instead they went after Wayne Simmonds ....6 years too late.


Exactly why I added "future stud" (according to SammyT_51).

I hope the comments remain conflicted. Means the proposal is close to making both sides unhappy. I think that means fair.
25 févr. 2021 à 7 h 20
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,293
Quoting: PeterK
Getting different opinions. This is exactly why Liljegren might be added. Tkachuk >> Nylander in terms of value. I love Nylander but he wouldn't be enough to get Tkachuk so you add Liljegren. Toronto has a wave of Dmen prospects coming plus their D core is quite young so they have some time. Liljegren MIGHT be a stud but far from a sure thing. You want the Leafs to win in the playoffs? Then you need to pay up for a guy like Tkachuk. It is easy to see the team lacking since Wayne Simmonds has gone down with injury. They need that kind of presence.

Imagine that top line: Matthews - Marner - Tkachuk. Who could match that line?


It's not different opinions, I like Liljegren and wouldn't be against trading for him. However Nylander does not start the conversation for Tkachuk so it stops there.

As for that line, it is matched by a lot of lines; Marchand - Bergeron - Pasta, Stamkos - Point - Kucherov, Landeskog - Mackinnon - Rantanen, Svechnikov - Aho - Teravainen.
25 févr. 2021 à 7 h 25
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 712
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
It's not different opinions, I like Liljegren and wouldn't be against trading for him. However Nylander does not start the conversation for Tkachuk so it stops there.

As for that line, it is matched by a lot of lines; Marchand - Bergeron - Pasta, Stamkos - Point - Kucherov, Landeskog - Mackinnon - Rantanen, Svechnikov - Aho - Teravainen.


Respectfully disagree. Also, lol at Carolina's line being comparable. Maybe in the future with Aho and Svech and someone else but not with Teravainen. He's great but not elite like the other lines you listed.
25 févr. 2021 à 7 h 32
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,293
Quoting: PeterK
Respectfully disagree. Also, lol at Carolina's line being comparable. Maybe in the future with Aho and Svech and someone else but not with Teravainen. He's great but not elite like the other lines you listed.


What part do you disagree with? Only way Leafs can get Tkachuk is if Matthews is on the table (which obviously isn't going to happen). Marner is nice too but that's just a wash. You can build teams around players like Tkachuk, you can't build teams around players like Nylander
25 févr. 2021 à 7 h 35
#16
Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 3,548
Mentions "j'aime": 1,582
Quoting: PeterK
Exactly why I added "future stud" (according to SammyT_51).

I hope the comments remain conflicted. Means the proposal is close to making both sides unhappy. I think that means fair.


HA. No. The comments are conflicted among Leaf fans. If you had Calgary fans conflicted THEN you could say the trade must be close to fair. But you won't entice any Calgary fans with this offer. They're well aware of how soft their team would be without Tkachuk.
25 févr. 2021 à 7 h 38
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
I think that’s a reasonable good trade in a hypothetical conversation but realistically Calgary just wouldn’t move him.
PeterK a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage