SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

I want Nick Paul

Créé par: Trickster
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 22 févr. 2021
Publié: 22 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Really like his game and think it could fit well role wise.
Transactions
OTT
    What does it take
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2022
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2181 500 000 $79 348 991 $0 $0 $2 151 009 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    700 000 $700 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    749 250 $749 250 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    700 000 $700 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    700 000 $700 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    725 000 $725 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    874 125 $874 125 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    900 000 $900 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    22 févr. 2021 à 15 h 52
    #1
    Buljujarvi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 4,209
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,552
    matthews
    ConnorMcJesus a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2021 à 15 h 59
    #2
    I heff to be mad...
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,494
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,196
    Loui Eriksson
    ConnorMcJesus a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2021 à 16 h 13
    #3
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 42,690
    Mentions "j'aime": 23,823
    Barclay Goodrow
    Isles777 et Claesson4Norris a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2021 à 16 h 15
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    hey look a squirrel
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 6,047
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,752
    My line of thinking was 4th rounder and low end prospect at most.
    oneX a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2021 à 16 h 17
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 2,770
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,619
    Quoting: Trickster
    My line of thinking was 4th rounder and low end prospect at most.


    I think a 3rd and prospect gets it done because he is playing well and yeah I'm with you on trying to get him.
    Trickster a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2021 à 16 h 30
    #6
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 6,784
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
    Quoting: Trickster
    My line of thinking was 4th rounder and low end prospect at most.


    Quoting: oneX
    I think a 3rd and prospect gets it done because he is playing well and yeah I'm with you on trying to get him.


    It'll cost an overpay that's not worth it. If a 3rd and prospect got it done I'm sure many teams would jump on it. Realistically he's a 4th line player having a good year on a terrible team, which doesn't scream "upgrade" to any contending team. I'd think Ottawa would start with a 2nd, Stepan got that and he's overpaid and does less. Ottawa coaches and management loves him and he's cheap plus signed through next season on a cost controlled deal. So for most teams, a 2nd and a prospect would probably be the target. For Toronto, being a divisional rival, I'd bet Ottawa asks for something similar to the Blake Coleman deal last year with a 1st and a top prospect. & with him only being anything relevant in the NHL just this season, it's not worth it. Leafs walk away in a heartbeat
    22 févr. 2021 à 16 h 41
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 16,984
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,985
    Quoting: Trickster
    My line of thinking was 4th rounder and low end prospect at most.


    Why would Ottawa trade him for that? He's way more valuable on the team. Ottawa really has no incentive to trade him unless they're getting really good value. He's shown this year he can play all situations in more than just a depth role, there's no reason he can't be a part of this team longer term.
    csick et Pinto a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2021 à 16 h 52
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 16,984
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,985
    Quoting: csick
    Barclay Goodrow


    Exactly. He's a versatile player, and a great role model for younger players. If Ottawa isn't getting really good value for moving him, they won't move him. Sens will look to improve going forward, and Paul helps them do that more than a mid round pick. No reason he can't be the new Zack Smith type depth piece for Ottawa.
    csick a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2021 à 16 h 58
    #9
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 42,690
    Mentions "j'aime": 23,823
    Quoting: Claesson4Norris
    Exactly. He's a versatile player, and a great role model for younger players. If Ottawa isn't getting really good value for moving him, they won't move him. Sens will look to improve going forward, and Paul helps them do that more than a mid round pick. No reason he can't be the new Zack Smith type depth piece for Ottawa.


    He’s big, fast and strong. Has a good shot and can create plays, not frustrating to watch at all. Why would anyone trade him for a 3rd and a random prospect
    TCMonkey a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2021 à 17 h 9
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 16,984
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,985
    Quoting: csick
    He’s big, fast and strong. Has a good shot and can create plays, not frustrating to watch at all. Why would anyone trade him for a 3rd and a random prospect


    What does Ottawa need with another mid round pick at this stage? Best case scenario for most mid round picks is they can maybe be a Nick Paul level player five years down the road.
    csick et TCMonkey a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2021 à 17 h 14
    #11
    Bet On It
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 610
    Mentions "j'aime": 230
    Quoting: Claesson4Norris
    Why would Ottawa trade him for that? He's way more valuable on the team. Ottawa really has no incentive to trade him unless they're getting really good value. He's shown this year he can play all situations in more than just a depth role, there's no reason he can't be a part of this team longer term.


    This right here is exactly it. He's 25 and playing very well; why would the Sens move him for an awful offer of a 4th and a low end prospect? They can just hang on to him and happily keep him around, or trade him to another team who will pay twice as much. A guy like Barclay Goodrow is a great example of what these kinds of guys go for; Barclay had 24 in 62 and was having a career year and went along with a 3rd for a 1st and Anthony Greco. Paul had 20 in 56 last year and has 8 in 20 this year so he's already more impressive than Goodrow has ever been. You can bet Ottawa is going to get more than a 4th and a low end prospect.

    Or, again, they'll hang on to him and keep him around as a leader. It's a win win and there's no incentive to move him for anything other than an overpay.
    Claesson4Norris, TCMonkey et csick a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage