SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Best Centres

Créé par: Canucks33
Équipe: 2020-21 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 21 févr. 2021
Publié: 22 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Center - Top 10 centers in the league in order

Scratch - Honorable mentions for top 10

IR - Players who get consideration after a big year or who were under consideration recently.
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1599 999 999 $173 897 166 $0 $6 125 000 $-73 897 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 460 250 $8 460 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 févr. 2021 à 13 h 30
#1
I want Gourde back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,524
Mentions "j'aime": 2,350
I'd personally put Aho over Scheifele, but it's pretty close
22 févr. 2021 à 13 h 30
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
mathews probably playing the best hockey of anyone on that list right now.
22 févr. 2021 à 13 h 34
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,179
Mentions "j'aime": 1,068
Quoting: pharrow
mathews probably playing the best hockey of anyone on that list right now.


He's proven himself as a top-5 player in the league without question in my mind this year.
22 févr. 2021 à 13 h 40
#4
Josh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 456
Mentions "j'aime": 276
I like this, few ones at the bottom I’d switch around myself, however this is good.
22 févr. 2021 à 13 h 40
#5
Josh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 456
Mentions "j'aime": 276
Quoting: RKLW
I like this, few ones at the bottom I’d switch around myself, however this is good.


Also might want to add Stammer somewhere ahaha
22 févr. 2021 à 13 h 42
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 4,090
Mentions "j'aime": 2,848
Matthews has to be number 2.
Cirelli needs to be better before he's in this conversation same goes for Jack Hughes.
For me there isn't that big a gap between Bergeron and O'Rielly. Whatever tier they're in I feel like they're both in. Splitting hairs at this point tho.
22 févr. 2021 à 13 h 49
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 7,864
Mentions "j'aime": 4,120
I don’t agree at all! I don’t get how some of these guys are on here.
22 févr. 2021 à 13 h 52
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,915
Mentions "j'aime": 1,082
Matthews probably 3rd and scheif is not a top 10 C in the league Eichel still top 5 C as well
22 févr. 2021 à 13 h 56
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,179
Mentions "j'aime": 1,068
Quoting: RKLW
Also might want to add Stammer somewhere ahaha


I consider Stamkos a full time winger now. He doesn't displace Point or Cirelli at center unless there's injuries.

Quoting: Rangsey
Matthews has to be number 2.
Cirelli needs to be better before he's in this conversation same goes for Jack Hughes.
For me there isn't that big a gap between Bergeron and O'Rielly. Whatever tier they're in I feel like they're both in. Splitting hairs at this point tho.


J. Hughes and Cirelli both impact the game so much for their teams but they don't get the numbers that the guys ahead of them do yet. Hughes will probably get there after a year or two of great production whereas Cirelli is a bit more of a longshot to hit those numbers, but still a great player.
22 févr. 2021 à 14 h 0
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 4,090
Mentions "j'aime": 2,848
Quoting: Canucks33
I consider Stamkos a full time winger now. He doesn't displace Point or Cirelli at center unless there's injuries.



J. Hughes and Cirelli both impact the game so much for their teams but they don't get the numbers that the guys ahead of them do yet. Hughes will probably get there after a year or two of great production whereas Cirelli is a bit more of a longshot to hit those numbers, but still a great player.


Both are great. Cirelli finished 4th in selke voting last year. Hughes (after the worst rookie season from a first overall pick ever) looks to be coming good. But to say they're among the top centres in the game is casting far to broad of a net.
22 févr. 2021 à 14 h 2
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,179
Mentions "j'aime": 1,068
Quoting: Rangsey
Both are great. Cirelli finished 4th in selke voting last year. Hughes (after the worst rookie season from a first overall pick ever) looks to be coming good. But to say they're among the top centres in the game is casting far to broad of a net.


To clarify, they're not there yet, but they're on an upward trajectory and are already pretty good players right now. Hughes might get to that level with 1-2 years of superstar production whereas Cirelli probably won't.
22 févr. 2021 à 14 h 21
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,389
Mentions "j'aime": 3,118
Barkov over Barzal....

Don't be silly.
22 févr. 2021 à 14 h 23
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 4,090
Mentions "j'aime": 2,848
Quoting: Canucks33
To clarify, they're not there yet, but they're on an upward trajectory and are already pretty good players right now. Hughes might get to that level with 1-2 years of superstar production whereas Cirelli probably won't.


I don't think Cirelli will ever have "superstar" production. But Bergeron has never really had superstar production either and he'll be in the HOF.
Canucks33 a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2021 à 18 h 58
#14
Josh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 456
Mentions "j'aime": 276
Quoting: Canucks33
I consider Stamkos a full time winger now. He doesn't displace Point or Cirelli at center unless there's injuries.

Ah I see, haven’t watch a lightning game in a few months so I was unaware he was sticking to wing right now.
22 févr. 2021 à 22 h 50
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: Rangsey
Matthews has to be number 2.
Cirelli needs to be better before he's in this conversation same goes for Jack Hughes.
For me there isn't that big a gap between Bergeron and O'Rielly. Whatever tier they're in I feel like they're both in. Splitting hairs at this point tho.


I think the convo on Bergeron really needs to be about more than production.
I know he's been a great player, but he's slowed down a lot. They basically pull him out whenever they are in the Ozone, and the limit his ever having to play a 200 foot game because he's 35 and he's not gonna keep up with some of the guys at the top of the list anymore. Now I know a lot of these guys get relatively the same same starting in 5v5 ice, There is only a 6% difference between say Matthews and Bergy, but if they had to play whole games running the ice one gets the feeling that Bergeron would be dead.
It's just a real eye soar to me that the first 9 years of his career he made his bones shutting guys down, getting 44% of his 5v5 starts in the Ozone, but now they won't ever let him play that game because he started to struggle with it. I mean he went from 44% to 54% to 60% in 3 seasons and hasn't looked back. It's smart coaching and good use of an older player and all. But I have a hard time comparing him to a lot of these guys who are at the peak of their game anymore because if you take out the zone starts and let them play a 200 foot game, I think he struggles. So a guy like O'Rielly, who's never had more than a 50% Ozone start is just hard to compare him to. O'Rielly. hasn't had to change his game. I give props to Bergy for changing his game, but guys who are at their peak and best in the league aren't changing their game.
Like no one is looking at the top 3 there and saying...oh yeah they have changed their game from x to y like Bergeron has. So he may have the production, points, wins, etc.... but he's really system dependent at this point and I don't think a lot of those top guys are. That's a huge gap.
Rangsey a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage