SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

trying to find some powerplay lines that can maybe score a goal or 2

Créé par: Borocop
Équipe: 2020-21 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 22 févr. 2021
Publié: 22 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
PP1 has dadonov in the slot with tim on the left wall, brannstrom up top, dzingel on the right wall and brady down low and in front of the net. Let brannstrom and tim distribute to some shooters off that left side. Can switch out dzingel for norris if you want.
PP2 gives chabot, norris and batherson their one timer strong sides. Threw nick paul out there because i like his puck retrevial ability and hes a big guy I think could play infront of the net, white can sit down low and make a couple passes.

Theyre like 0/23-24 over their last bunch of powerplays, somethings gotta give
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2022
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de SJS
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $68 824 249 $0 $7 170 000 $12 675 751 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
749 250 $749 250 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $ (3 475 000 $$3M3 475 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 févr. 2021 à 10 h 49
#1
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
The PP looked really good last night... Just a matter of time before it's starts going in again.

Don't think Dzingle brings much to the PP.... I might have him on PP2

Also, you got to keep Batherson on PP1.. Wayy tooo much skill and vision to have play the last 30 seconds of a Powerplay
Borocop et SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2021 à 11 h 7
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,971
Mentions "j'aime": 11,965
I like Brannstrom on PP1, but I'm going to keep banging the two D on the top unit drum until DJ tries it. Brannstrom's skillset is better suited to being the top point man, but Chabot would be more effective on the halfwall in the one timer spot. He's got one of the nastiest shots in the entire NHL, and I feel like it isn't used to its full potential as a scoring option from up on the point (I believe he only has something like 2 powerplay goals in his career). Chabot has the ability to be one of those freak Dmen who can score 20 goals in a season, and putting him there can help him get there.

I would load up the top unit. Tkachuk as the netfront guy, Chabot right wall, Stützle left wall, Dadonov bumper spot and Brannstrom the point guy. Gives you the most dangerous possible 1st unit, and still leaves plenty of forward talent available for the 2nd unit. Only potential concern is no regular C on that unit, but Brady is usually the faceoff guy anyway on the PP.

PP2 would be Batherson and Norris on the left and right walls, White as the bumper guy, Paul as netfront guy (or Dzingel once he gets here) and whichever one of Reilly or Wolanin is in the lineup as the Point guy.
Borocop a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2021 à 11 h 11
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,971
Mentions "j'aime": 11,965
Quoting: ThatGuy
The PP looked really good last night... Just a matter of time before it's starts going in again.

Don't think Dzingle brings much to the PP.... I might have him on PP2

Also, you got to keep Batherson on PP1.. Wayy tooo much skill and vision to have play the last 30 seconds of a Powerplay


Agree with Dzingel. Solid player, but he doesn't have the high level talent to play top unit ahead of other forwards. Great complimentary talent and would fit well as a PP2 guy, but lacks the shot, vision and passing abilities of guys ahead of him like Stützle, Dadonov Norris etc. His speed would definitely be an asset on zone entries though.
ThatGuy a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2021 à 11 h 11
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 467
Mentions "j'aime": 149
Biggest thing is keeping players from playing the full 2min. Switch it first time puck leaves offensive zone after 45sec, then back to pp1 after 45 sec of pp2.

No one on this team should be playing the full 2min - that's Ovechkin-level shooters only to me.

Biggest thing they need is more & faster movement. Rotation, crossing through the slot, all kinds of other single and multi-player movement patterns out there. A player and puck showing up same time is better than player waiting for puck.
Borocop a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2021 à 11 h 32
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
If want pp help oilers got chiasson and Neal could get one of them for next to nothing and either one is capable of having a significant impact on pp.
22 févr. 2021 à 11 h 48
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 467
Mentions "j'aime": 149
Quoting: Timmah007
If want pp help oilers got chiasson and Neal could get one of them for next to nothing and either one is capable of having a significant impact on pp.


Already tried Chiasson - but I don't think they'll be looking at additional bad salary, they have enough.
22 févr. 2021 à 12 h 1
#7
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Agree with Dzingel. Solid player, but he doesn't have the high level talent to play top unit ahead of other forwards. Great complimentary talent and would fit well as a PP2 guy, but lacks the shot, vision and passing abilities of guys ahead of him like Stützle, Dadonov Norris etc. His speed would definitely be an asset on zone entries though.


Yeah I agree!

I am happy they were able to pick him up, especially for that speed.
22 févr. 2021 à 14 h 9
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Quoting: BsInOttawa
Already tried Chiasson - but I don't think they'll be looking at additional bad salary, they have enough.


He’s not bad salary tho... excellent net front presence on pp and smart 5-5 depth player. Does a lot of little things right makes very very few mistakes. Excellent depth veteran presence. Neal I can understand salary concerns but not chiasson he provides enough to justify salary.
23 févr. 2021 à 6 h 33
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 467
Mentions "j'aime": 149
Quoting: Timmah007
He’s not bad salary tho... excellent net front presence on pp and smart 5-5 depth player. Does a lot of little things right makes very very few mistakes. Excellent depth veteran presence. Neal I can understand salary concerns but not chiasson he provides enough to justify salary.


If it was good salary no one in Edmonton would want to trade him. He didn't show much more than replacement level when he played for Ottawa before, I think it looks like his production in Edm a product of who he's played with. In any case, no reason for Ottawa to trade for pending UFA unless it's part of moving similar out.
23 févr. 2021 à 10 h 53
#10
Démarrer sujet
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,500
Mentions "j'aime": 2,970
Quoting: Timmah007
He’s not bad salary tho... excellent net front presence on pp and smart 5-5 depth player. Does a lot of little things right makes very very few mistakes. Excellent depth veteran presence. Neal I can understand salary concerns but not chiasson he provides enough to justify salary.


net front presence isint really the problem imo, just dont have the right attacking mentality or the shooters from the perimeter to be super dangerous
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage