SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Oilers Need D

Créé par: DarthKane
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 21 févr. 2021
Publié: 21 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Once Murphy is healthy.
Transactions
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $59 189 647 $1 090 244 $2 715 000 $22 310 353 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
562 500 $562 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 févr. 2021 à 21 h 48
#1
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,991
Mentions "j'aime": 2,842
I'd be thrilled if the hawks get anything for De Haan, he's been bad all season.
SadSensFan14 a aimé ceci.
21 févr. 2021 à 22 h 7
#2
The Spawn is back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,277
Mentions "j'aime": 1,068
Only guy out longterm looks to be Koekkoek, who was about the 7th-8th best dman anyway. Bear and Lagesson should be back on the next few games, so trading for a D man who undergoes a 2 week isolation wait from an American team would make little sense. If another dman goes down in the next game or two, a trade would be more likely for a Canadian division dman, like Mete or Kulak I'd think, who could step in right away for the crucial gap before Lagesson and Bear are back.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
21 févr. 2021 à 22 h 41
#3
sen krak fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 4,391
Mentions "j'aime": 1,516
Quoting: NickC1988
I'd be thrilled if the hawks get anything for De Haan, he's been bad all season.


Agreed, althouth they could get SOMETHING for him, just not much at all. Maybe a 5th or a 6th.
21 févr. 2021 à 22 h 43
#4
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,991
Mentions "j'aime": 2,842
Quoting: Brad21
Agreed, althouth they could get SOMETHING for him, just not much at all. Maybe a 5th or a 6th.


At this point, most of the kids on the Hawks are playing pretty well. De Haan might be expendable, but they also might expose him to meet expansion requirements.
SadSensFan14 a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2021 à 13 h 0
#5
Pistol Pete
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,140
Mentions "j'aime": 1,479
edmonton has lots of D.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2021 à 13 h 43
#6
HawksDynasty
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 263
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: NickC1988
I'd be thrilled if the hawks get anything for De Haan, he's been bad all season.


I'm just curious to hear why you think that. I find him to be very serviceable in the right situation. I don't see him as a bad player or a good player. He your average joe

Quoting: NickC1988
At this point, most of the kids on the Hawks are playing pretty well. De Haan might be expendable, but they also might expose him to meet expansion requirements.



your right about the kids too they are playing very well and I do find it critical to play them.
24 févr. 2021 à 14 h 17
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,753
Mentions "j'aime": 7,634
Quoting: oilsince95
Only guy out longterm looks to be Koekkoek, who was about the 7th-8th best dman anyway. Bear and Lagesson should be back on the next few games, so trading for a D man who undergoes a 2 week isolation wait from an American team would make little sense. If another dman goes down in the next game or two, a trade would be more likely for a Canadian division dman, like Mete or Kulak I'd think, who could step in right away for the crucial gap before Lagesson and Bear are back.

AFAIK Lagesson & Bear are going to be ready this week, so that scenario isn't likely to happen. And Lennstrom is currently in quarantine, he'd be the next replacement.
Oilyboy a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2021 à 14 h 34
#8
Pistol Pete
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,140
Mentions "j'aime": 1,479
Quoting: oilsince95
Only guy out longterm looks to be Koekkoek, who was about the 7th-8th best dman anyway. Bear and Lagesson should be back on the next few games, so trading for a D man who undergoes a 2 week isolation wait from an American team would make little sense. If another dman goes down in the next game or two, a trade would be more likely for a Canadian division dman, like Mete or Kulak I'd think, who could step in right away for the crucial gap before Lagesson and Bear are back.


Jones can handle till Lagesson or lennstrom are around at the very least.
Oilyboy a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2021 à 21 h 39
#9
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,991
Mentions "j'aime": 2,842
Quoting: Bsikora780
I'm just curious to hear why you think that. I find him to be very serviceable in the right situation. I don't see him as a bad player or a good player. He your average joe




your right about the kids too they are playing very well and I do find it critical to play them.


He just makes more mistakes than a veteran should be making. At $4M+ a year, I just don't think he's worth the money.
24 févr. 2021 à 21 h 43
#10
HawksDynasty
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 263
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: NickC1988
He just makes more mistakes than a veteran should be making. At $4M+ a year, I just don't think he's worth the money.


Thats fair to say
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage