SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If EK65 didnt resign

Créé par: JacobLyons
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 15 févr. 2021
Publié: 15 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
For fun.
Transactions
1.
2.
WSH
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
3.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $74 128 334 $0 $445 000 $7 371 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Stars de Dallas
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
735 000 $735 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
723 333 $723 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 févr. 2021 à 7 h 52
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
That D is still atrocious and Wilson would've taken the biggest L in all of trading history, most likely.

That being said, this team would've probably been a bit better than 3rd worst in the league, meaning OTT wouldn't have gotten Stutzle I reckon. Maybe Drysdale or Quinn.
LGuy54 a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2021 à 9 h 10
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Maybe the Sharks wouldn't been that much better, but long term they would have much more cap spent more wisely than Karlsson. Plus the additional draft picks. Wilson overpaid to get Karlsson for Just one season, but Sharks did go to Cup Final. But like so many other GMs, he tried to justify a trade by signing Karlsson (in this case) to an extension. Yuck.
15 févr. 2021 à 9 h 27
#3
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
Quoting: palhal
Maybe the Sharks wouldn't been that much better, but long term they would have much more cap spent more wisely than Karlsson. Plus the additional draft picks. Wilson overpaid to get Karlsson for Just one season, but Sharks did go to Cup Final. But like so many other GMs, he tried to justify a trade by signing Karlsson (in this case) to an extension. Yuck.


Sharks only got to the conference finals with Karlsson in 2018-19. He got traded in september 2018 so wasn't there in 2016 when SJ made the final.
palhal a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2021 à 9 h 28
#4
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
Quoting: justaBoss
That D is still atrocious and Wilson would've taken the biggest L in all of trading history, most likely.

That being said, this team would've probably been a bit better than 3rd worst in the league, meaning OTT wouldn't have gotten Stutzle I reckon. Maybe Drysdale or Quinn.


For as much criticism that Dorion gets, he pulled off a master-stroke in hindsight by not resigning Karlsson.
palhal a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2021 à 9 h 37
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Quoting: Richard88
For as much criticism that Dorion gets, he pulled off a master-stroke in hindsight by not resigning Karlsson.


You're right. Remember the Sens went to the Conference Finals, I believe 2017. The following year they added Duchene to try to get them "over the top". But for so reason the team got worse.
For the Sens tried to get better and spend $$$$ but it didn't work. When it became obvious EK wasn't resigning the following season....and really has play had fallen off, Sens made a great trade.
Same wih Stone later in year....Sens weren't making the playoffs and Stone wasn't resigning, so they traded him. Same with Duchene...they recovered some their losses with the Columbus trade.
So the next few years we'll see what Ottawa does with those draft picks acquired, and the cap space they have.
15 févr. 2021 à 9 h 38
#6
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: Richard88
For as much criticism that Dorion gets, he pulled off a master-stroke in hindsight by not resigning Karlsson.


Tbf it seemed more like EK didn't want to re-sign with OTT, considering all things.

All Dorion did was getting some kind of return for the guy. And for the record, it was considered first to be an extremely bad trade from the guy.

Naturally no one could've expected Sharks, or EK for that matter, to flop like that afterwards.
15 févr. 2021 à 9 h 43
#7
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
Quoting: palhal
You're right. Remember the Sens went to the Conference Finals, I believe 2017. The following year they added Duchene to try to get them "over the top". But for so reason the team got worse.
For the Sens tried to get better and spend $$$$ but it didn't work. When it became obvious EK wasn't resigning the following season....and really has play had fallen off, Sens made a great trade.
Same wih Stone later in year....Sens weren't making the playoffs and Stone wasn't resigning, so they traded him. Same with Duchene...they recovered some their losses with the Columbus trade.
So the next few years we'll see what Ottawa does with those draft picks acquired, and the cap space they have.

Whilst Dorion was right in hindsight to trade Karlsson, he probably could have gotten a better return. He got a bit lucky that the 1st turned into a top 3 pick, just like Sakic with the Byram pick.

The Stone trade was terrible for Ottawa. Brannstrom and a late 2nd (that they spent on an overager in Sokolov) isn't a great return on one of the best wingers in the game.

Quoting: justaBoss
Tbf it seemed more like EK didn't want to re-sign with OTT, considering all things.

All Dorion did was getting some kind of return for the guy. And for the record, it was considered first to be an extremely bad trade from the guy.

Naturally no one could've expected Sharks, or EK for that matter, to flop like that afterwards.

Yes you're right. It was a meagre return, but Dorion got lucky the 1st turned into Stutzle.
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2021 à 9 h 45
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Quoting: Richard88
Whilst Dorion was right in hindsight to trade Karlsson, he probably could have gotten a better return. He got a bit lucky that the 1st turned into a top 3 pick, just like Sakic with the Byram pick.

The Stone trade was terrible for Ottawa. Brannstrom and a late 2nd (that they spent on an overager in Sokolov) isn't a great return on one of the best wingers in the game.


Yes you're right. It was a meagre return, but Dorion got lucky the 1st turned into Stutzle.


Everybody new UFA Stone wasn't going to resign....so I imagine Dorion took the best offer. How much more could they have got for a rental.?
15 févr. 2021 à 10 h 11
#9
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,580
Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
Quoting: palhal
Everybody new UFA Stone wasn't going to resign....so I imagine Dorion took the best offer. How much more could they have got for a rental.?


Vegas signed him pretty soon after. Dorion could have insisted on a better return from them as it was effectively almost a sign-and-trade.
15 févr. 2021 à 10 h 22
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,351
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: Richard88
Sharks only got to the conference finals with Karlsson in 2018-19. He got traded in september 2018 so wasn't there in 2016 when SJ made the final.


a near carbon copy of 2016-17 Ottawa Senators
- Both team went to CF
- Both team acquried a disgruntled good players and unknowingly giving up top prospects. I bet neither Dorion nor Sakic believed, at the time trade were made, they would get Stutzle and Byram respectively
- Both disgruntled player of both trade ended up giving their blessing despite wanting out of the team they used to love. (Duchene being a diehard Avs fan growing up and Karlsson seemed like he loves Ottawa as much as Alfredsson)
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2021 à 10 h 33
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,351
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: palhal
Everybody new UFA Stone wasn't going to resign....so I imagine Dorion took the best offer. How much more could they have got for a rental.?


But if you think about it, Mark Stone trade is a disaster because Vegas technically gave up way more to acquire Paciorety.
1) Nick Suzuki, guy could be better than Vegas's #1 prospect in Cody Glass
2) 2018 30th pick turned Joe Veleno
3) two 2nd round picks
4) one 3rd round pick
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage