SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

realistic rebuild 3

Créé par: matttgmoore9512
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 14 févr. 2021
Publié: 14 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
21 400 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 000 000 $
55 000 000 $
44 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Beniers, Matthew
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
    Expansion draft
    2.
    3.
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de MIN
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2081 500 000 $74 201 667 $0 $212 500 $7 298 333 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Beniers, Matthew
    925 000 $925 000 $
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 6
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    796 667 $796 667 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    778 333 $778 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    UFA - 1

    Unités spéciales

    Avantage numérique 1
    Avantage numérique 2
    Beniers, M.
    Infériorité numérique 1
    Infériorité numérique 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    14 févr. 2021 à 3 h 2
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2016
    Messages: 454
    Mentions "j'aime": 84
    Regarding Compher for Labanc:

    1) Sharks don't do that. Labanc is a better, more valuable player than Compher.
    2) Avalanche don't do that either. Compher is cheaper; Labanc is a better player but still a complementary piece. They'd likely target someone like Meier or Hertl from the Sharks.

    Also, Seattle doesn't take Jones. No way, Jose!
    FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
    14 févr. 2021 à 3 h 12
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 2
    Mentions "j'aime": 0
    What about everything else?
    14 févr. 2021 à 3 h 57
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,216
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
    Quoting: matttgmoore9512
    What about everything else?


    Well if we're rebuilding the objective would be to

    a) Take on bad contracts for assets like picks and prospects
    b) Tank for better draft lottery possibilities.
    c) Shed any potentially bad contracts.

    So apart from the fact that the Avs trade is bad for the Sharks and that Seattle will never take Jones, I just don't think most of the free agent signings make a ton of sense. I think the Kane trade is okay honestly but we'd rather take on bad contracts and keep Jones than spend 10 million on goalies and another 8+ million to get Pearson, Coleman and Goodrow. So in a rebuilding scenario as the Sharks I would personally not make any big FA signings and take on guys like Okposo, Eriksson etc. who are all on short term deals with really bad cap hits. I also might ship out one or two of Meier, Hertl, Couture, Kane or Labanc just for picks or prospects.
    14 févr. 2021 à 6 h 8
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 9,545
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,567
    The Sharks won't trade Labanc for Compher but if they did I think the Avs would accept.
    14 févr. 2021 à 10 h 25
    #5
    John 3 16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 9,581
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
    Quoting: TJTwolf
    The Sharks won't trade Labanc for Compher but if they did I think the Avs would accept.


    Hmm I'm not so sure Avs would accept. Labanc is undoubtedly an upgrade in talent, but he's a complementary forward which Avs don't really need and he also has a $4.75m which would be hard to fit into the cap structure going forwards. Moreover, I'd be wary of acquiring a forward with just one season above 0.5ppg pace signed to almost $5m for another 3 years after this season.
    14 févr. 2021 à 11 h 20
    #6
    John Leonard Viewer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 1,325
    Mentions "j'aime": 444
    Jones would require a first at this point, at minimum sadly.
    14 févr. 2021 à 12 h 54
    #7
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 19,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
    penguins decline. Why would they give up a younger player on a better contract who is frankly better, for an over paid problem child player.
    14 févr. 2021 à 17 h 17
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 9,545
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,567
    Quoting: Richard88
    Hmm I'm not so sure Avs would accept. Labanc is undoubtedly an upgrade in talent, but he's a complementary forward which Avs don't really need and he also has a $4.75m which would be hard to fit into the cap structure going forwards. Moreover, I'd be wary of acquiring a forward with just one season above 0.5ppg pace signed to almost $5m for another 3 years after this season.


    I was thinking more if we're not re-signing Saad as well.
    14 févr. 2021 à 17 h 52
    #9
    John 3 16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 9,581
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
    Quoting: TJTwolf
    I was thinking more if we're not re-signing Saad as well.


    I'd rather spend that money on resigning a two-way 45-50 point forward than a maybe-50 point PP specialist.
    TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage