SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Relax

Créé par: Shibbal18
Équipe: 2020-21 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 11 févr. 2021
Publié: 11 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
BUF
  1. Holden, Nick
  2. Reaves, Ryan
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de VAN
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $72 523 334 $1 487 500 $4 337 500 $8 976 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 050 000 $3 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 625 000 $1 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
874 125 $874 125 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
864 166 $864 166 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 févr. 2021 à 16 h 43
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
Quoting: LindyRuffRider
We're not losing because we are getting physically beaten. We're losing because a lack of scoring from our top 6 / good goaltending.

There's nothing showing that Reaves will be beneficial to this team. There's plenty of tougher players who forecheck with some skill. Go after Sam Bennett if you want. Hell try to maybe get Virtanen back on track.


I said that SOMETIMES we lose games because we are physically beaten, this is not only about this season, but also the past, and under Housley it was also. Virtanen might be a good addition too, but he's already in this thread. We do not trade Montour for Reaves one for one, we add some parts that may be useful for our roster and in particular physical strength and give the best conditions for the development of Jokiharju, Dahlin and possibly Borgen.
11 févr. 2021 à 16 h 51
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 447
Mentions "j'aime": 140
Quoting: SalamiCheese
Right now, because Montour is useless to us, he is not good for playing with Dahlin, he cannot play well on LD, he is not good on PP and not too good on PK. At the same time, Jokiharju has to play LD due to too many RDs. Also Reaves is the jackhammer we are missing. Moreover, we are unlikely to get much for Montour in TDL, or he will simply leave for free in the summer.


This description is all the reason for Vegas to say no.
11 févr. 2021 à 16 h 57
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
Quoting: Redguard191
This description is all the reason for Vegas to say no.


Fair smile
11 févr. 2021 à 17 h 19
#29
Démarrer sujet
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,192
Mentions "j'aime": 9,012
Quoting: LindyRuffRider
People literally said the same thing about Simmonds that you're saying about Reaves. Simmonds at the very least had some ability on the PP though.

Tough teams are analytically good teams. Maroon, Goodrow, and Coleman aren't useless grinders lmao. Those 3 were good analytically. You're kinda proving my point.

What's even considered a tough player to you? Was Bogosian not a tough guy? Was Jordan Nolan not a tough guy? What about John Scott? Or Deslauriers? Our team must've been so good with all these tough guys over the years.

This really just comes off as upset boomer yelling at the clouds. You seem to just go off how you feel compared to reality.


Deslauriers has been a great 4th liner, John Scott played on a team where Steve Ott was one of their top scoring forwards. Nolan was not a tough guy, youre right, and Bogosian was an absolute band aid. Reaves doesnt even have bad analytics he has better analytics than Okposo and Sheahan, so you dont even have a point to prove. Nothing I said is based in feeling, its provable across the board, only keyboard warriors are invested that much into analytics that they ignore every aspect of the game. All you have are a select group of numbers that still show he would be an improvement anyway

Quoting: LindyRuffRider
You clearly said take out the worst game of the season. That's just stupid.

It's a not clear outlier. It's how he's played the last 2 years. You want to cherry pick to fit your narrative.

Adding a tough skilled player helps. Not a useless 4th line grinder.

" But no we should stick 5'9 Ruotsalainen on the 4th line, thats a perfect use of his talents, thats how teams win in "ThE nEw NhL"

Yea who even needs talented players now a days. Johnny Gaudreau or Brayden Point? They're not tough enough. Let's get John Scott back, call up Kaleta, maybe get Rob Ray out of the booth. We'll be unstoppable. Such a tough team. Nobody's gonna mess with us now!


Take out statistical outliers, that happens often. Im sorry I guess I missed the seasons where Gaudreau and Point were stapled to the bench on the 4th line because CGY wanted more scoring forwards for the "New NHL"
11 févr. 2021 à 17 h 53
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 1,115
Mentions "j'aime": 623
Quoting: Shibbal18
Deslauriers has been a great 4th liner, John Scott played on a team where Steve Ott was one of their top scoring forwards. Nolan was not a tough guy, youre right, and Bogosian was an absolute band aid. Reaves doesnt even have bad analytics he has better analytics than Okposo and Sheahan, so you dont even have a point to prove. Nothing I said is based in feeling, its provable across the board, only keyboard warriors are invested that much into analytics that they ignore every aspect of the game. All you have are a select group of numbers that still show he would be an improvement anyway

Take out statistical outliers, that happens often. Im sorry I guess I missed the seasons where Gaudreau and Point were stapled to the bench on the 4th line because CGY wanted more scoring forwards for the "New NHL"



Reaves is bad analytically. He is in the bottom percentile of pretty much everything. His team plays exceptionally better when he's off the ice. There's really no reason to give a guy like him ice time. He's a below replacement level player at this point. That doesn't help our team at all. But he's tough I guess.

"Nothing I said is based in feeling, its provable across the board, only keyboard warriors are invested that much into analytics that they ignore every aspect of the game. All you have are a select group of numbers that still show he would be an improvement anyway"

The only keyboard warrior is you. You seem to get really upset when someone brings up metrics that have more specificity and predictability than your basic stats. Nothing shows that Ryan Reaves has a positive impact on the ice for a team. It's just you feel that his "toughness" is a boost, when nothing shows that.

The facts are that we are a below average team goaltender wise. The facts are Hutton has been a bottom of the league goalie for the past 2 years. You don't get to take bad games out because they don't fit your narrative. All you seemingly do is cherry pick really small sample sizes.

I guess I missed that the 5'9 Gaudreau and 5'9 Point aren't tough enough to play in "your NHL". Guys like them won't last like apparently Arttu wouldn't be able to make it in the bottom 6. Need more big oafs with little skill
11 févr. 2021 à 18 h 2
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 1,115
Mentions "j'aime": 623
Quoting: SalamiCheese
I said that SOMETIMES we lose games because we are physically beaten, this is not only about this season, but also the past, and under Housley it was also. Virtanen might be a good addition too, but he's already in this thread. We do not trade Montour for Reaves one for one, we add some parts that may be useful for our roster and in particular physical strength and give the best conditions for the development of Jokiharju, Dahlin and possibly Borgen.


I'm fine trading Montour, but as a result of this trade, we are adding Reaves to the roster and giving him ice time. A player that drags down his teammates. The whole team plays exceptionally better when he's off the ice. He's exactly what the team doesn't need.
11 févr. 2021 à 18 h 7
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
Quoting: LindyRuffRider
I'm fine trading Montour, but as a result of this trade, we are adding Reaves to the roster and giving him ice time. A player that drags down his teammates. The whole team plays exceptionally better when he's off the ice. He's exactly what the team doesn't need.


Ok try to replace Reaves with Bennett, I don't care.
11 févr. 2021 à 18 h 15
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 1,115
Mentions "j'aime": 623
Quoting: SalamiCheese
Ok try to replace Reaves with Bennett, I don't care.


Then why'd you respond?
11 févr. 2021 à 18 h 37
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
Quoting: LindyRuffRider
Then why'd you respond?


Because this was a full trade Montour (RD) for Holden (LD) + Reaves + 3rd what I think would help our team at this stage.
Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
12 févr. 2021 à 1 h 26
#35
Démarrer sujet
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,192
Mentions "j'aime": 9,012
Quoting: LindyRuffRider
Reaves is bad analytically. He is in the bottom percentile of pretty much everything. His team plays exceptionally better when he's off the ice. There's really no reason to give a guy like him ice time. He's a below replacement level player at this point. That doesn't help our team at all. But he's tough I guess.

"Nothing I said is based in feeling, its provable across the board, only keyboard warriors are invested that much into analytics that they ignore every aspect of the game. All you have are a select group of numbers that still show he would be an improvement anyway"

The only keyboard warrior is you. You seem to get really upset when someone brings up metrics that have more specificity and predictability than your basic stats. Nothing shows that Ryan Reaves has a positive impact on the ice for a team. It's just you feel that his "toughness" is a boost, when nothing shows that.

The facts are that we are a below average team goaltender wise. The facts are Hutton has been a bottom of the league goalie for the past 2 years. You don't get to take bad games out because they don't fit your narrative. All you seemingly do is cherry pick really small sample sizes.

I guess I missed that the 5'9 Gaudreau and 5'9 Point aren't tough enough to play in "your NHL". Guys like them won't last like apparently Arttu wouldn't be able to make it in the bottom 6. Need more big oafs with little skill


I mean im the one who backed my comments up with stats and facts, youre just making claims and hoping no one looks it up.
https://public.tableau.com/shared/R8TTH6QRJ?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link
https://public.tableau.com/shared/3B79KZCR3?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link
And for some reason you think Im defending Hutton, because I said their over all goaltending hasnt been that bad. So yeah lets put Ruotsalainen in a 10 minute a game defensive role, I'm sure he wont be on the first flight back to Finland. You are specifically who I am talking about with this title
12 févr. 2021 à 13 h 52
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 1,115
Mentions "j'aime": 623
Quoting: Shibbal18
I mean im the one who backed my comments up with stats and facts, youre just making claims and hoping no one looks it up.
https://public.tableau.com/shared/R8TTH6QRJ?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link
https://public.tableau.com/shared/3B79KZCR3?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link
And for some reason you think Im defending Hutton, because I said their over all goaltending hasnt been that bad. So yeah lets put Ruotsalainen in a 10 minute a game defensive role, I'm sure he wont be on the first flight back to Finland. You are specifically who I am talking about with this title


https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/516808271659794440/809856481491026021/Screenshot_2021-02-11_Micah_Blake_McCurdy_on_Twitter.png

https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1272659405054541825/photo/1

https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1272663485135179781/photo/1

He's a negative to his team, a below replacement level player, and his play is trending downwards. We already have some bad players on the team. We don't need more.

You're the one who brought up Hutton with your cherry picking. Facts are that we're below average goaltending.

I would much rather have Arttu over some bum like Ryan Reaves who we'd be paying for another year.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage