SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playoffs

Créé par: quinnjj
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 6 févr. 2021
Publié: 9 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
OTT
  1. Matheson, Michael
  2. Rodrigues, Evan
  3. Sceviour, Colton
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $81 020 175 $0 $1 062 500 $479 825 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
733 333 $733 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 févr. 2021 à 17 h 26
#1
Bet On It
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 610
Mentions "j'aime": 230
This is a really really rough trade, and I just think it might come from either not knowing who White and/or Tierney are, or maybe not realizing who Matheson is. I see there are 7 players on the taxi squad and the limit is 6, so I'm just not sure if there's an unfamiliarity aspect here.

There have been a lot of White for Pettersson trades around here. It doesn't make a lot of sense for Ottawa and really only had legs because Ottawa fans were unfairly unhappy with White because every fanbase needs a whipping boy and they had chosen him after his struggles last year. But this one is completely different because instead you're using Matheson, who's got one of the worst deals in the league, and two replacement level players, and trying to get back Ottawa's best center right now in White and a solid bottom 6 option in Tierney? With only two 2nds going back? Not likely. The Matheson deal in itself would carry a significant sweetener just to take, let alone getting back two valuable assets in return. Ottawa would say no here and it's not even close.
TCMonkey et sensibleguy a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2021 à 17 h 29
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,883
Mentions "j'aime": 11,894
Mike Matheson is a huge cap dump. This isn't close to good for Ottawa.
sensibleguy a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2021 à 19 h 42
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: Claebom
This is a really really rough trade, and I just think it might come from either not knowing who White and/or Tierney are, or maybe not realizing who Matheson is. I see there are 7 players on the taxi squad and the limit is 6, so I'm just not sure if there's an unfamiliarity aspect here.

There have been a lot of White for Pettersson trades around here. It doesn't make a lot of sense for Ottawa and really only had legs because Ottawa fans were unfairly unhappy with White because every fanbase needs a whipping boy and they had chosen him after his struggles last year. But this one is completely different because instead you're using Matheson, who's got one of the worst deals in the league, and two replacement level players, and trying to get back Ottawa's best center right now in White and a solid bottom 6 option in Tierney? With only two 2nds going back? Not likely. The Matheson deal in itself would carry a significant sweetener just to take, let alone getting back two valuable assets in return. Ottawa would say no here and it's not even close.


white for MP is an OTT fan phantasy that is never going to happen.
That White contract is every bit as bad as the Matheson contract. Matter of fact, I'd say it's worse so far given the 3 games Matheson has had as a penguin.
So lets just step back into reality here on this trade.
And reality is those two are basically a swap of what are considered bad contracts. Which is really a true understanding of "who White is."
Which leads us to the question of is Tierney worth 2 2nd round picks. And the answer to that is no, he's not.
9 févr. 2021 à 21 h 11
#4
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
Quoting: pharrow
white for MP is an OTT fan phantasy that is never going to happen.
That White contract is every bit as bad as the Matheson contract. Matter of fact, I'd say it's worse so far given the 3 games Matheson has had as a penguin.
So lets just step back into reality here on this trade.
And reality is those two are basically a swap of what are considered bad contracts. Which is really a true understanding of "who White is."
Which leads us to the question of is Tierney worth 2 2nd round picks. And the answer to that is no, he's not.


Ottawa doesn’t want Matheson or Pettersson. They are fine with the White contract, and the offers here were only because of how bad Reilly, Coburn, and Josh Brown were. That’s past now with Zub and Brannstrom or Wolanin playing. There’s also no need to trade Tierney right now either.

Ottawa wasn’t expected to win, they just didn’t want to lose so bad. Now the games are closer, and as far as I know, only Reilly, Coburn, or Josh Brown are likely to be traded, maybe Stepan.
9 févr. 2021 à 21 h 13
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: sensibleguy
Ottawa doesn’t want Matheson or Pettersson. They are fine with the White contract, and the offers here were only because of how bad Reilly, Coburn, and Josh Brown were. That’s past now with Zub and Brannstrom or Wolanin playing. There’s also no need to trade Tierney right now either.

Ottawa wasn’t expected to win, they just didn’t want to lose so bad. Now the games are closer, and as far as I know, only Reilly, Coburn, or Josh Brown are likely to be traded, maybe Stepan.


that really isn't the point. It's more the value of the trade. aka the massive over valuation of white.
9 févr. 2021 à 23 h 30
#6
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
Quoting: pharrow
that really isn't the point. It's more the value of the trade. aka the massive over valuation of white.


Whites fine, he just can’t win faceoffs at a high enough %. He’s played more with a left shot centre to take his weak side draws, and suddenly the criticisms stop, in Ottawa, but it takes longer for the rest of the leagues fans to catch up to that.
10 févr. 2021 à 12 h 14
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: sensibleguy
Whites fine, he just can’t win faceoffs at a high enough %. He’s played more with a left shot centre to take his weak side draws, and suddenly the criticisms stop, in Ottawa, but it takes longer for the rest of the leagues fans to catch up to that.


production vs contract sucks. That's all it balances out to. You over value a guy compared to another because he's from OTT. That contract has been dead weight for OTT.
10 févr. 2021 à 13 h 7
#8
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
Quoting: pharrow
production vs contract sucks. That's all it balances out to. You over value a guy compared to another because he's from OTT. That contract has been dead weight for OTT.


This isn't fantasy hockey
10 févr. 2021 à 14 h 21
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: sensibleguy
This isn't fantasy hockey


no its not, you don't get to trade dead weight for value
10 févr. 2021 à 14 h 30
#10
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
Quoting: pharrow
no its not, you don't get to trade dead weight for value


Tell that to the Pens fans who keep offering Matheson for White.
10 févr. 2021 à 14 h 40
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: sensibleguy
Tell that to the Pens fans who keep offering Matheson for White.


why both lack value and are bad contracts.
10 févr. 2021 à 14 h 43
#12
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
Quoting: pharrow
why both lack value and are bad contracts.


White's contract is for a little too much, Matheson's contract is for a lot too much, and a lot too long, there's a difference here.
10 févr. 2021 à 14 h 49
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: sensibleguy
White's contract is for a little too much, Matheson's contract is for a lot too much, and a lot too long, there's a difference here.


White's contract is just as long, and his value is honestly less than Matheson's. Hell defense is always a need, look at Jack Johnson over there in a rangers sweater now.
But forwards.....good luck moving that. They are a dime a dozen.

You can keep telling yourself the white contract is somehow better because he plays for OTT, here is some objective facts. It's not. It's a bad contract, just as bad.
Hell people moved Gudbranson for 3 years like it was freaking nothing. Didn't even have to take bad contracts back.
Believe me, Matheson is a better player than Guddy was.
So of those two bad contracts, he's the best of the two.
10 févr. 2021 à 15 h 30
#14
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
Quoting: pharrow
White's contract is just as long, and his value is honestly less than Matheson's. Hell defense is always a need, look at Jack Johnson over there in a rangers sweater now.
But forwards.....good luck moving that. They are a dime a dozen.

You can keep telling yourself the white contract is somehow better because he plays for OTT, here is some objective facts. It's not. It's a bad contract, just as bad.
Hell people moved Gudbranson for 3 years like it was freaking nothing. Didn't even have to take bad contracts back.
Believe me, Matheson is a better player than Guddy was.
So of those two bad contracts, he's the best of the two.


Wrong!

Your rhetoric is pathetic.

White's contract might run one season less, but Matheson will be 32 at the end of his contract, and White will be 28, that's a huge difference in term. White will come much closer to his salary of $4.75MM starting next season, than Matheson will come to his $5, $4, and then three seasons of $6.75MM, at age 29-32, that's ridiculous. Ottawa can't afford that much salary for the way Matheson plays. Also, White is likely to be traded in 23/24, to a team with deeper pockets, and the team will deal with the value at that point.

Comparing Matheson's $32MM owed to Gudbranson's $4MM owed, is another ridiculous comparison.
10 févr. 2021 à 16 h 6
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: sensibleguy
Wrong!

Your rhetoric is pathetic.

White's contract might run one season less, but Matheson will be 32 at the end of his contract, and White will be 28, that's a huge difference in term. White will come much closer to his salary of $4.75MM starting next season, than Matheson will come to his $5, $4, and then three seasons of $6.75MM, at age 29-32, that's ridiculous. Ottawa can't afford that much salary for the way Matheson plays. Also, White is likely to be traded in 23/24, to a team with deeper pockets, and the team will deal with the value at that point.

Comparing Matheson's $32MM owed to Gudbranson's $4MM owed, is another ridiculous comparison.


1st of all A. 32 isn't old for a defenseman. So to think Matheson's age is the issue here is ludacris.
B. saying White will be traded is no different than saying Matheson will be traded, which at this point in time is much more likely given the play of both, because,
C. we aren't talking about Guddy's 4 million. Guddy went with 3 years on that contract. From VAN > PIT>ANA>OTT.
which if anything goes to show the movability of a defense man, even one people view as a "bad" contract. Which is the point I was making. That not only was he moved, but without bad cap coming back.
3x4 ain't really much worse than 5x4.
So it's not like defensemen are unmovable. Now you won't see Bad winger contracts move like that.
Meanwhile, good luck finding comparable wingrers who are like 10 goal 20 point guys on 4.75 million contracts that are moved that easily.
10 févr. 2021 à 16 h 22
#16
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
Quoting: pharrow
1st of all A. 32 isn't old for a defenseman. So to think Matheson's age is the issue here is ludacris.
B. saying White will be traded is no different than saying Matheson will be traded, which at this point in time is much more likely given the play of both, because,
C. we aren't talking about Guddy's 4 million. Guddy went with 3 years on that contract. From VAN > PIT>ANA>OTT.
which if anything goes to show the movability of a defense man, even one people view as a "bad" contract. Which is the point I was making. That not only was he moved, but without bad cap coming back.
3x4 ain't really much worse than 5x4.
So it's not like defensemen are unmovable. Now you won't see Bad winger contracts move like that.
Meanwhile, good luck finding comparable wingrers who are like 10 goal 20 point guys on 4.75 million contracts that are moved that easily.


Is 32 the same as 28? What rhetoric will you use to say they are?

This is a waste of time, goodbye
10 févr. 2021 à 16 h 32
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: sensibleguy
Is 32 the same as 28? What rhetoric will you use to say they are?

This is a waste of time, goodbye


does it matter his last year is at 32?
No it doesn't.
You are right this is a waste of time. You can't name me one winger with a bad contract like that moved like bad defense man are. Because there are none.
So yearh,
goodbye.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage