SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

COVID Protocol

Créé par: DarthKane
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 25 janv. 2021
Publié: 26 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $63 008 814 $1 090 244 $3 482 500 $18 491 186 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
562 500 $562 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 janv. 2021 à 0 h 7
#1
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
It's amazing how there's 6 new faces (Included Shaw since he didn't play last season) in the forward group yet the 4th line is somehow the same as the Edmonton bubble. Mind boggling how considerably worse this team has gotten. Suter and Kurashev are good, but you can't replace Toews and Dach with the others.
26 janv. 2021 à 0 h 11
#2
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
Replace Shaw with Soderberg
Beaudin should be playing over Kalynuk
26 janv. 2021 à 0 h 15
#3
Démarrer sujet
DarthKane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 828
Mentions "j'aime": 130
Quoting: NickC1988
It's amazing how there's 6 new faces (Included Shaw since he didn't play last season) in the forward group yet the 4th line is somehow the same as the Edmonton bubble. Mind boggling how considerably worse this team has gotten. Suter and Kurashev are good, but you can't replace Toews and Dach with the others.


Nobody is trying to replace Toews and Dach, JC is icing the best lineup he can with the players he has.

Without Toews, Dach and Nylander of course the team is worse.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2021 à 0 h 15
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,980
Mentions "j'aime": 9,277
Health not withstanding, Boqvist not being on the ice for a few games I think will actually help him. Debrincat though is a punch in the gut.
26 janv. 2021 à 0 h 16
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,980
Mentions "j'aime": 9,277
Quoting: NickC1988
It's amazing how there's 6 new faces (Included Shaw since he didn't play last season) in the forward group yet the 4th line is somehow the same as the Edmonton bubble. Mind boggling how considerably worse this team has gotten. Suter and Kurashev are good, but you can't replace Toews and Dach with the others.


Except Hagel for Highmore. I think Highmore has been good but so far Hagel is a little bit better. They should be playing Hagel, Kampf and Higmore. Carps is not very valuable at this point and would rather see Hagel and Highmore being a high energy extremely fast forechecking nightmare with Kampf playing extremely good defense.
DarthKane a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2021 à 18 h 24
#6
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
Quoting: DarthKane
Nobody is trying to replace Toews and Dach, JC is icing the best lineup he can with the players he has.

Without Toews, Dach and Nylander of course the team is worse.


I'm not saying they're trying to replace them, as obviously this team was on pace to take a step back by losing Crawford has taken multiple steps back due to injury. Not sure if he's truly icing the best line up at this point, the difference is probably so minuscule anyways.

Quoting: ChiHawk
Except Hagel for Highmore. I think Highmore has been good but so far Hagel is a little bit better. They should be playing Hagel, Kampf and Higmore. Carps is not very valuable at this point and would rather see Hagel and Highmore being a high energy extremely fast forechecking nightmare with Kampf playing extremely good defense.


I agree, no reason not to play the kids at this point. Your boy Carlsson is getting another crack tonight.
26 janv. 2021 à 21 h 45
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,980
Mentions "j'aime": 9,277
Quoting: NickC1988
I'm not saying they're trying to replace them, as obviously this team was on pace to take a step back by losing Crawford has taken multiple steps back due to injury. Not sure if he's truly icing the best line up at this point, the difference is probably so minuscule anyways.



I agree, no reason not to play the kids at this point. Your boy Carlsson is getting another crack tonight.


I haven't liked Carlsson since the day we acquired him. He's strong defensively, but there is no reason we should have acquired a guy like that when we had guys in the system we could of groomed. Wallmark and Janmark are other guys unless we are unloading them for assets at the TDL. Janmark is the best of the 3 but again, we aren't really competing so why?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage