SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Make the Cup run this year

Créé par: milehigh11
Équipe: 2020-21 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 21 janv. 2021
Publié: 21 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Would love to get Rakell and Gibson on the Avs. Frankie is already hurt. Grubauer hasnt stayed healthy a whole season and PLAYOFF yet. I dont want the downfall of this team to be goalie once again.

Trade them anyone but Byram and Newhook who are needed for the future.
Transactions
ANA
  1. Annunen, Justus
  2. Compher, J.T.
  3. Donskoi, Joonas
  4. Graves, Ryan
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (COL)
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (COL)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2023
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $78 030 359 $0 $5 425 000 $3 469 641 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
874 125 $874 125 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (1 175 000 $$1M1 175 000 $$1M)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (925 000 $$925K925 000 $$925K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 janv. 2021 à 14 h 22
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 860
Mentions "j'aime": 264
Fancouz gets claimed
21 janv. 2021 à 14 h 23
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,135
Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
Add one of Byram/Newhook if not both. Nothing in this package makes ANA consider moving Gibson let alone him and Rakell

Quality over quantity
MOTDux et villenash a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2021 à 14 h 24
#3
Quack Quack Quack!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 493
Mentions "j'aime": 211
Not even close without Byram
21 janv. 2021 à 14 h 26
#4
I want Gourde back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,524
Mentions "j'aime": 2,350
No way Anaheim even considers this. You'd have to add Byram
21 janv. 2021 à 14 h 39
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,910
Mentions "j'aime": 724
You'd at least need to give them Grubauer haha... why would ANA do this? I don't think they are that far out from contending, and Gibson is their future. They still want to at least compete, given the Shattenkirk signing. Losing Gibson is basically forfeiture
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2021 à 15 h 47
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,586
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Quoting: Salzy
Add one of Byram/Newhook if not both. Nothing in this package makes ANA consider moving Gibson let alone him and Rakell

Quality over quantity


I agree with quantity over quality but you are smoking some premium kush if you think they are adding 2 top 10 in the league prospects at premium positions on ELC’s for a goalie who is coming off a career worse year and arguably has had the 2 worst years of his career. I have much respect for Gibson and he is honestly the only goalie I would consider trading Byram as part of the deal, not for long but I would consider it.
21 janv. 2021 à 15 h 54
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,135
Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
Quoting: Xqb15
I agree with quantity over quality but you are smoking some premium kush if you think they are adding 2 top 10 in the league prospects at premium positions on ELC’s for a goalie who is coming off a career worse year and arguably has had the 2 worst years of his career. I have much respect for Gibson and he is honestly the only goalie I would consider trading Byram as part of the deal, not for long but I would consider it.


I do smoke and grow premium kush but yeah to get ANA to consider moving Gibson they would have to. Not saying I think they would and I wouldn’t add either of them if I’m COL. Asking price doesn’t equal selling price. Gibson also had terrible teams in front of him those years. Stats don’t tell the whole story and I watch every Ducks game. He has not regressed at all and I would argue he’s better in spite of the stats. With his contract he is without a doubt the most valuable goalie in the league. I know goalies don’t hold value as well in trades but two top prospects would be more than fair imo, prospects aren’t guaranteed while Gibson’s ability is. ANA has no reason to move him or even consider it and any team trying to get him would have to blow them away
21 janv. 2021 à 16 h 18
#8
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,446
Mentions "j'aime": 3,630
Grubauer was not injured his first year in Denver and played in all 12 of the Avs playoff games. Last year sucked but injuries happen. The "injury-prone" narrative is oversold.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2021 à 17 h 12
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,586
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Quoting: Salzy
I do smoke and grow premium kush but yeah to get ANA to consider moving Gibson they would have to. Not saying I think they would and I wouldn’t add either of them if I’m COL. Asking price doesn’t equal selling price. Gibson also had terrible teams in front of him those years. Stats don’t tell the whole story and I watch every Ducks game. He has not regressed at all and I would argue he’s better in spite of the stats. With his contract he is without a doubt the most valuable goalie in the league. I know goalies don’t hold value as well in trades but two top prospects would be more than fair imo, prospects aren’t guaranteed while Gibson’s ability is. ANA has no reason to move him or even consider it and any team trying to get him would have to blow them away


You aren’t getting 2 top 10 prospects for a goalie and I think Gibson has the most value in the league. It would be like ANA trading Zegras AND Drysdale they’d expect a lot more than a goalie. I was using save percentage as the measure and he has had his worst and 3rd worst seasons the last 2 years. But that’s me trying to drive the price down.
Salzy a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2021 à 17 h 28
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,135
Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
Quoting: Xqb15
You aren’t getting 2 top 10 prospects for a goalie and I think Gibson has the most value in the league. It would be like ANA trading Zegras AND Drysdale they’d expect a lot more than a goalie. I was using save percentage as the measure and he has had his worst and 3rd worst seasons the last 2 years. But that’s me trying to drive the price down.


I agree COL shouldn’t do it, but the point I’m trying to make is ANA has no reason to move him unless they get completely blown away and I doubt only one of them blows them away, a better ask would be one of them and Timmins but honestly I don’t think there is a realistic package out there for Gibson, much like Price when the Habs were bad I don’t see Gibson being moved
Xqb15 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage