SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Price sucked tn ngl

Créé par: habsfan01
Équipe: 2020-21 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 21 janv. 2021
Publié: 21 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Not impressed with carey tn. Habs bailed him out too many times. also i was thinking, it might have nothing to do with anything but what if Price is off because maybe they put his dogs down or they are getting worse?? i'm a little worried
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de WSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
Logo de VGK
Logo de MTL
Logo de OTT
Logo de PHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $73 366 309 $0 $3 137 500 $8 133 691 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
735 000 $735 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
771 666 $771 666 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 janv. 2021 à 0 h 51
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Price played like Koskinen
habsfan01 a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2021 à 0 h 57
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,241
The refs didn't do their job fairly either though. You can't say the reffing was unbiased in a game that ends with 6 PP for the Canucks and 1 for the Habs.
habsfan01 a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2021 à 1 h 1
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Modifié 21 janv. 2021 à 1 h 7
Quoting: Campabee
The refs didn't do their job fairly either though. You can't say the reffing was unbiased in a game that ends with 6 PP for the Canucks and 1 for the Habs.


Oh come on... where I agree this game was horribly reffed, it was NOT slanted. Roussel got a penalty for merely existing. Kulak got a penalty for nothing as well... those cancel. Multiple missed calls on both sides.

KK decided to backchat and Anderson put the puck over the glass. Chiarot also went rogue on that one play and took a blatant penalty. You guys didn't have to take those.

Poorly reffed, but the refs did not hand us the game.


-


Price did have a bad game, but thats bound to happen [Holtby also had a down game]. He's looked solid in his other appearances this year.
habsfan01 a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2021 à 1 h 7
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: Wqrrior
Oh come on... where I agree this game was horribly reffed, it was NOT slanted. Roussel got a penalty for merely existing. Kulak got a penalty for nothing as well... those cancel. Multiple missed calls on both sides.

KK decided to backchat and Anderson put the puck over the glass. You guys didn't have to take those.

Poorly reffed, but the refs did not hand us the game.


-


Price did have a bad game, but thats bound to happen [Holtby also had a down game]. He's looked solid in his other appearances this year.


MTL penalties ( outside Kulak ) were fine, but the refs missed so many particularly on the Habs side. Roussel shouldn't have got a penalty
habsfan01 a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2021 à 1 h 11
#5
Molson beer is meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 3,736
Mentions "j'aime": 1,675
Quoting: Wqrrior
Oh come on... where I agree this game was horribly reffed, it was NOT slanted. Roussel got a penalty for merely existing. Kulak got a penalty for nothing as well... those cancel. Multiple missed calls on both sides.

KK decided to backchat and Anderson put the puck over the glass. You guys didn't have to take those.

Poorly reffed, but the refs did not hand us the game.


-


Price did have a bad game, but thats bound to happen [Holtby also had a down game]. He's looked solid in his other appearances this year.




Kind of hard to say it wasn't slanted when *looks at boxscore* VAN had 6 PP and Habs 1 PP.... sure I'd say 3 of them were completely warranted by MTL (puck over glass penalties are getting annoying), but one or two bad calls on VAN doesn't equate to the 3 bs given to MTL and the many non-calls *looks at replay of KK literally getting dragged down by his face*. That Anderson "Roughing" penalty is what happens when someone who's close to 60lbs heavier pushes Hughes...
habsfan01 et GMs a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2021 à 2 h 54
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: Blazingbat11
Kind of hard to say it wasn't slanted when *looks at boxscore* VAN had 6 PP and Habs 1 PP.... sure I'd say 3 of them were completely warranted by MTL (puck over glass penalties are getting annoying), but one or two bad calls on VAN doesn't equate to the 3 bs given to MTL and the many non-calls *looks at replay of KK literally getting dragged down by his face*. That Anderson "Roughing" penalty is what happens when someone who's close to 60lbs heavier pushes Hughes...


The amount of penalties was product of how disciplined each team was. VAN only had one or two others that could have potentially been called, likewise for the habs. Both teams had a weak call on them. Anderson's penalty was warranted and was more than a penalty. Just because the # of penalties is 6 to 1 doesn't mean its out of favor... you guys had the less disciplined team.

Besides, VAN hasn't had one PP goal coming into this game, so perhaps the issue is your guys ability to be disciplined and kill the penalties. This game wasn't gifted by the refs. No need to look for excuses. Other fans from neutral fanbases agreed that the bad reffing was not favoring one side.
habsfan01 a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2021 à 3 h 47
#7
Molson beer is meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 3,736
Mentions "j'aime": 1,675
Quoting: Wqrrior
The amount of penalties was product of how disciplined each team was. VAN only had one or two others that could have potentially been called, likewise for the habs. Both teams had a weak call on them. Anderson's penalty was warranted and was more than a penalty. Just because the # of penalties is 6 to 1 doesn't mean its out of favor... you guys had the less disciplined team.

Besides, VAN hasn't had one PP goal coming into this game, so perhaps the issue is your guys ability to be disciplined and kill the penalties. This game wasn't gifted by the refs. No need to look for excuses. Other fans from neutral fanbases agreed that the bad reffing was not favoring one side.


More than a penalty.....seriously lol...... and I haven't seen any other "fanbase" here agree with you.

Habs we clearly an undisciplined team during the game, and VAN's PP unblocking was due, no one is debating you there. The whole issue is that VAN were equally as undisciplined and the refs either turned a blind eye or genuinely missed the calls.
But honestly, for me it's was really just the one non-call on pulling KK down by his face that bothered me, then a few minutes later KK gets called for chirping the ref.... ridiculous
21 janv. 2021 à 3 h 57
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: Blazingbat11
More than a penalty.....seriously lol...... and I haven't seen any other "fanbase" here agree with you.

Habs we clearly an undisciplined team during the game, and VAN's PP unblocking was due, no one is debating you there. The whole issue is that VAN were equally as undisciplined and the refs either turned a blind eye or genuinely missed the calls.
But honestly, for me it's was really just the one non-call on pulling KK down by his face that bothered me, then a few minutes later KK gets called for chirping the ref.... ridiculous


Yeah, this one KK penalty is the one miscall that stands out. I know there were missed calls, but not nearly enough to cause the scope of this game to be altered. I'd give you that one. I can't locate any other miscall that was as blatant and obvious. Still, aside the Kulak penalty, I don't think any of the MTL ones were horribly misguided.

https://twitter.com/HeresYourReplay/status/1352099594423963648?s=20

Anderson's penalty was more than deserved. This is not necessary in hockey. No need to shove someone aggressively into the net on a play that doesn't involve them. Where you might argue it more of a gray area type penalty (not a given), it was right in front of the ref and after the whistle. This is a cheap shot. If any of our players did that to Suzuki, nobody would be complaining.
Or, if nothing else, I don't think it's fair to argue that this play was just handing VAN the game.
21 janv. 2021 à 4 h 23
#9
Molson beer is meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 3,736
Mentions "j'aime": 1,675
Quoting: Wqrrior
Yeah, this one KK penalty is the one miscall that stands out. I know there were missed calls, but not nearly enough to cause the scope of this game to be altered. I'd give you that one. I can't locate any other miscall that was as blatant and obvious. Still, aside the Kulak penalty, I don't think any of the MTL ones were horribly misguided.

https://twitter.com/HeresYourReplay/status/1352099594423963648?s=20

Anderson's penalty was more than deserved. This is not necessary in hockey. No need to shove someone aggressively into the net on a play that doesn't involve them. Where you might argue it more of a gray area type penalty (not a given), it was right in front of the ref and after the whistle. This is a cheap shot. If any of our players did that to Suzuki, nobody would be complaining.
Or, if nothing else, I don't think it's fair to argue that this play was just handing VAN the game.






We'll have to agree to disagree on the Anderson call

but you're preaching to the quire, Habs fans have seen these kinds of things for years with their "small forwards" being around the crease getting shoved, cross-checked, speared, etc.
seriously though, look at that replay, they both literally go straight to the net from a shot...this kind of play happens multiple times, EVERY game, between players going to the net, and 99% of the time the Dman shoves the guy away from the goalie, and every now and then it's start a bit of a scrum. This really is just a 170lbs kid (and you see him looking back at Anderson knowing its coming) getting shoved by a 230lbs guy... it reminded me of times when Chara would do that to Gallagher, same result, no call. It was a bs sympathy call from the ref for seeing Hughes getting embarrassed (who had an awful game by the way)
21 janv. 2021 à 5 h 3
#10
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,976
Mentions "j'aime": 4,044
Quoting: Blazingbat11




We'll have to agree to disagree on the Anderson call

but you're preaching to the quire, Habs fans have seen these kinds of things for years with their "small forwards" being around the crease getting shoved, cross-checked, speared, etc.
seriously though, look at that replay, they both literally go straight to the net from a shot...this kind of play happens multiple times, EVERY game, between players going to the net, and 99% of the time the Dman shoves the guy away from the goalie, and every now and then it's start a bit of a scrum. This really is just a 170lbs kid (and you see him looking back at Anderson knowing its coming) getting shoved by a 230lbs guy... it reminded me of times when Chara would do that to Gallagher, same result, no call. It was a bs sympathy call from the ref for seeing Hughes getting embarrassed (who had an awful game by the way)


If you want to talk about preaching to the quire you are literally arguing with a Canucks fan about a bigger player getting a penalty for hitting a smaller player lmao Myers gets the same call 24/7, and in all honestly that is a penalty and it's a dumb one to take Anderson didn't need to do it hence the roughing call, he was trying to get under a star players skin and and it backfired and bit him in the ass
Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2021 à 8 h 28
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,132
Mentions "j'aime": 14,142
The Carey Price contract will go down as one of the top 5 worst contracts in NHL history. It was a hilariously bad contract before he finished signing his name.
21 janv. 2021 à 22 h 25
#12
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,976
Mentions "j'aime": 4,044
Quoting: Blazingbat11




We'll have to agree to disagree on the Anderson call

but you're preaching to the quire, Habs fans have seen these kinds of things for years with their "small forwards" being around the crease getting shoved, cross-checked, speared, etc.
seriously though, look at that replay, they both literally go straight to the net from a shot...this kind of play happens multiple times, EVERY game, between players going to the net, and 99% of the time the Dman shoves the guy away from the goalie, and every now and then it's start a bit of a scrum. This really is just a 170lbs kid (and you see him looking back at Anderson knowing its coming) getting shoved by a 230lbs guy... it reminded me of times when Chara would do that to Gallagher, same result, no call. It was a bs sympathy call from the ref for seeing Hughes getting embarrassed (who had an awful game by the way)


Same play just happened with myers got called, still a bs call now?
21 janv. 2021 à 22 h 30
#13
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 860
Mentions "j'aime": 264
Quoting: theleano1
Same play just happened with myers got called, still a bs call now?


yes. just the the edmundson penalty
21 janv. 2021 à 23 h 47
#14
Molson beer is meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 3,736
Mentions "j'aime": 1,675
Quoting: theleano1
Same play just happened with myers got called, still a bs call now?


yes, it is. I don't know if it just the new NHL, or Refs are really looking out for the younger star players, but since I've actively started watching the Habs twenty odd years ago, it's always been the same message. There's a price to pay to be in front of the net. doesn't matter if its in the offensive or defensive zone.
theleano1 a aimé ceci.
22 janv. 2021 à 1 h 29
#15
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,976
Mentions "j'aime": 4,044
Quoting: Blazingbat11
yes, it is. I don't know if it just the new NHL, or Refs are really looking out for the younger star players, but since I've actively started watching the Habs twenty odd years ago, it's always been the same message. There's a price to pay to be in front of the net. doesn't matter if its in the offensive or defensive zone.


Respect for you seeing it both ways, league has gotten softer tho i do understand why it is a penalty now a days
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage