SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ok fine rebuilding Nashville for the second time today

Créé par: AndrewLadd
Équipe: 2021-22 Predators de Nashville
Date de création initiale: 19 janv. 2021
Publié: 19 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This time it’s really a rebuild. All trades made after the expansion draft. All firsts r top 5 protected.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
2750 000 $
22 350 000 $
2925 000 $
1925 000 $
33 000 000 $
1925 000 $
21 250 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
NSH
ANA
  1. Grimaldi, Rocco
Détails additionnels:
Expansion draft
2.
NSH
  1. Beecher, John [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Ekholm, Mattias
Détails additionnels:
Comes w an extension.
3.
NSH
  1. Bean, Jake [Droits de RFA]
  2. Gardiner, Jake
  3. Pashin, Alexander [Liste de réserve]
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (CAR)
4.
NSH
  1. Smith, C.J. [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
5.
NSH
  1. Niku, Sami
  2. Roslovic, Jack [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Johansen, Ryan (1 500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Only way RoJo gets traded is w retention IMO.
6.
NSH
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Lind, Kole [Droits de RFA]
  3. Rafferty, Brogan [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
7.
NSH
  1. Dellandrea, Ty
  2. Honka, Julius [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Forsberg, Filip
Détails additionnels:
Deadline trade, comes w an extension.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de COL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
2022
Logo de NSH
Logo de BOS
Logo de WPG
Logo de DAL
Logo de NSH
Logo de WPG
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de NSH
Logo de CAR
Logo de VAN
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de DAL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $62 351 142 $0 $537 500 $19 148 858 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 857 143 $2 857 143 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Predators de Nashville
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Predators de Nashville
9 059 000 $9 059 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 4
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
733 333 $733 333 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Predators de Nashville
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 janv. 2021 à 15 h 50
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,302
Mentions "j'aime": 1,834
Quoting: Caniac2000
Pashin is was ranked as one of the best prospects going into the draft. Scouts love him. He fell because he's tiny. Not because he's a bad kid. He's VERY talented going forward, although he does have some issues defensively. He was projected to be a 2nd rounder. He fell to the 7th. That doesn't mean he's not good enough to have gone in the 2nd round because it's quite wrong, and that is the approach you are taking here.

Gunler and Bokk are very similar, I don't think you truly know the quality of each piece if you think there's a large gap between the two. However, if neither are a starting piece, then I do not see a way in which a deal can be made.


Didn’t notice that pashin was grimaldi small. Yeh teams tend to stray from that small of prospects since the NHL as a whole has been trending towards prototypical power forward types.

Bokk reminds me a lot of Tolvanen and while that’s an interesting piece it’s too much boom or bust for my taste.

Honestly I viewed the main piece being Bean and the pick and I thought that was fine from Nashville’s perspective. I thought Gardiner was a cap casualty to even out the cap hits since he’s being paid a huge amount for a 3rd pairing role. If there’s a different cap dump of sorts that’s similar in cap I’d be game personally.
19 janv. 2021 à 16 h 0
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,511
Mentions "j'aime": 5,026
Quoting: herzausstein
Didn’t notice that pashin was grimaldi small. Yeh teams tend to stray from that small of prospects since the NHL as a whole has been trending towards prototypical power forward types.

Bokk reminds me a lot of Tolvanen and while that’s an interesting piece it’s too much boom or bust for my taste.

Honestly I viewed the main piece being Bean and the pick and I thought that was fine from Nashville’s perspective. I thought Gardiner was a cap casualty to even out the cap hits since he’s being paid a huge amount for a 3rd pairing role. If there’s a different cap dump of sorts that’s similar in cap I’d be game personally.


I'm going to go backwards here because I could gladly talk about Pashin for hours.

Gardiner has been on the ice for 3 of the Canes 5 even strength goals so far. He's not a "cap casualty". He's a very good offensive defenseman. He didn't even have a down year last year and people started trying to murder him because he was a big minus. He's not scored a point in a Canes win since the David Ayres game (in the regular season). While I know that isn't a large sample size, it does show you that he is VERY important to this team in the way that he plays. If you're looking for a cap casualty, someone like Niederreiter may be more desirable. He's having an up year so far, and his value may help contribute to a player package like this.

Bokk is very talented. He's a good player and I don't think that he's as boom or bust as Tolvanen. He's got that great shot, which will make him a desirable piece to anyone.

Pashin dropped because he's shorter than most players sticks. Not because he's a 7th round talent. A lot of scouts had him going in round 2. He fell to pick 199. He wasn't expected to be that low.
19 janv. 2021 à 16 h 43
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,597
Mentions "j'aime": 5,193
Quoting: Caniac2000
Pashin is was ranked as one of the best prospects going into the draft. Scouts love him. He fell because he's tiny. Not because he's a bad kid. He's VERY talented going forward, although he does have some issues defensively. He was projected to be a 2nd rounder. He fell to the 7th. That doesn't mean he's not good enough to have gone in the 2nd round because it's quite wrong, and that is the approach you are taking here.

Gunler and Bokk are very similar, I don't think you truly know the quality of each piece if you think there's a large gap between the two. However, if neither are a starting piece, then I do not see a way in which a deal can be made.


Clearly you're a big fan of Pashin, and that's great! I get the feeling he was on your radar even before the draft, and it's awesome when your fav team selects a prospect you're already a fan of. It's just that if any GM felt he was worth being selected in the 2nd round, someone would have taken him then, or shortly after. 31 NHL teams (including CAR) didn't feel that way. That's not to say he can't/won't make it or that his stock won't rise as he develops, but if you're thinking his trade value right now is close to a 2nd, I'm afraid it's not. He hasn't played nearly enough since the draft (no one has) for opinions to change that drastically on any prospect.

I'm pretty high on Gunler, and he was on my shortlist of prospects I hoped NSH would take in the 2nd round. Bokk seems like much less of a sure thing to me. To each their own. But yeah, to me neither would be an ideal main piece for Arvidsson. Given that NSH still sees themselves as a contender (I have serious doubts about that, and wish they started a rebuild at the last deadline) and made moves in that direction this summer, trading Arvidsson isn't likely at all right now anyway. Maybe in the offseason or at the deadline if they bottom out, but they have to give the current lineup a chance first.
20 janv. 2021 à 12 h 7
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,511
Mentions "j'aime": 5,026
Quoting: gmgb
Clearly you're a big fan of Pashin, and that's great! I get the feeling he was on your radar even before the draft, and it's awesome when your fav team selects a prospect you're already a fan of. It's just that if any GM felt he was worth being selected in the 2nd round, someone would have taken him then, or shortly after. 31 NHL teams (including CAR) didn't feel that way. That's not to say he can't/won't make it or that his stock won't rise as he develops, but if you're thinking his trade value right now is close to a 2nd, I'm afraid it's not. He hasn't played nearly enough since the draft (no one has) for opinions to change that drastically on any prospect.

I'm pretty high on Gunler, and he was on my shortlist of prospects I hoped NSH would take in the 2nd round. Bokk seems like much less of a sure thing to me. To each their own. But yeah, to me neither would be an ideal main piece for Arvidsson. Given that NSH still sees themselves as a contender (I have serious doubts about that, and wish they started a rebuild at the last deadline) and made moves in that direction this summer, trading Arvidsson isn't likely at all right now anyway. Maybe in the offseason or at the deadline if they bottom out, but they have to give the current lineup a chance first.


Every single mock draft I could find had him going no later than 45th. He fell 144 places. That's not because he's bad, it's because he's smaller than Grimaldi. He was on a line with Amirov, and with the New Jersey pick who's name I cannot spell. He wasn't someone I particularly cared about. He would have been a good 2nd round pick. I could have seen him falling to the 4th or 5th. But to the 7th is beyond a steal. EVERYONE knows his talent level. He's got genuine top 6 upside, and should NEVER have fallen like he did. He's already playing with the MHL right now. 31 games played and 38 points, and just playing with people. He's incredible.

Gunler sounds like someone you rated highly, which might be why you see the difference between the two, but the truth is, Bokk may even be better. Bokk (on a significantly worse team) tallied far better at his last WJC's than Gunler did this year, yes I know Bokk was a year older and we'll see what Gunler does next year, but that's not a good start for the swede. Bokk's domestic play has struggled, but he's been so badly misused, it's beyond a joke. He's on the 3rd line and being told to play as a grinder, which harms his talent more than it could ever help his development.
25 janv. 2021 à 16 h 3
#30
LETS GO PREDS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 15
If Poile decided to do this, chances are he would keep forsberg
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage