SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Honest Discussion of Young Players

Créé par: Hawks_Are_Dumm
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 15 janv. 2021
Publié: 15 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Adam Boqvist: He's good, but not great. I see lots of Hawks fans hating on Boqvist saying he sucks and shouldn't be in the NHL. He was a regular last year and played decent. I don't think playing in the AHL will be good for him, he'll be too good. I think playing under Colliton will do wonders for him. Duncan Keith was, what, 24 when he made the NHL? If Boqvist sticks in the NHL he'll be really good in 2 years I think. Like really good as in 40+ points, ok defensively. He has to get stronger and get used to playing against the big boys.

Dominik Kubalik: He needs more of an opportunity. Kubs isn't a guy you want on your third line. You want him in your top 6. He's insane. Playing on a line with Wallmark or Suter who can really dish it would be excellent. Strome and DeBrincat will be Strome and DeBrincat. No one ever said your first line is supposed to play defense. Look at Tampa: Kucherov, Point, Stamkos are their big 3. Yes I know they don't always play together but none of them play great defense. Kane, Strome, and Cat are perfectly fine together. You pay them to score, not block shots.

Lastly, what are you guys hearing about Toews? I have seen some saying he just doesn't want to play hockey anymore and that this is an anti-hockey mental health issue. What are we looking at, worst case scenario factually?
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $60 335 481 $1 090 244 $2 550 000 $21 164 519 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
562 500 $562 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 janv. 2021 à 12 h 7
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,157
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
I agree Kubalik is 100% a top 6 player. Boqvist's knock was always that he wasnt good defensively, ppl thought he was something like Karlsson/Barrie. I havent seen much of him but is that the issue right now? He needs to be playing with more skilled forwards imo.
15 janv. 2021 à 12 h 10
#2
... We're a "Team"..
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,426
Mentions "j'aime": 1,137
You'd have to think that whiplashes from management about a rebuild or not is what's effecting/(?)affecting, I cannot be sure which one to use (?) him the most so yeah I'd say a mental issue. Trading Saad AGAIN probably has something to do with it. Worst case scenario is illness, mental or otherwise.

I really like Boqvist but a lot pressure has been put on him now that he's basically you're #1 offensive RHD. Patience will be key with him. Trading Jokiharju didn't really help as I thought him and Boqvist being a 1-2 punch on the right side would've been really cool to see in the future.

Kubalik proved in the playoffs/bubble he should be in the top 6.
Hawks_Are_Dumm a aimé ceci.
15 janv. 2021 à 12 h 54
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,188
Mentions "j'aime": 2,123
One thing to keep in mind with Boqvist is that he was one of the youngest players in his draft, like almost a full year younger than Hughes. So he still has time he needs to put on muscle and mature. But realistically, I think his trade value is higher than the value that he will likely give us in the future and if we can use him in a package to get another premium young forward this summer, then I would do that.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage